JB/003/466/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/466/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/466/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/466/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->5 Aug. 1801</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Quantity of Stock Annuities bought in, or<lb/>
 
payd off, with this £60,000,000<lb/>
 
of money at <unclear>85</unclear> as above – } 70,588,235.</p>
 
<p>Besides profit by reduction of 5 per Cents and<lb/>
4 per Cent <del>to 3 per</del> Stock Annuities to<lb/>
3 per Cent Note Annuities <del>the</del> (profit <del><gap/></del><lb/>
by the difference between £3 per Cent, and<lb/>
£2:19<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> per Cent being already reckoned) <add>of</add> which<lb/>
profit the Annuity Note system will either have<lb/>
been the cause <hi rend="underline">sine quâ non</hi>, or a concurrent<lb/>
cause to an indeterminable degree.</p>
<p>Two pe Cent <del>upon £48,250,427</del> <add>per annum upon £48,250,427<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+ Commons Account No VI 17 Apr. 1801, p.9</hi></note></add> of 5 per<lb/>
Cent <add>subject to correction for the Loyalty Loan)</add> is per annum – £965,008<lb/>
One per Cent <add>per annum</add> upon £45,269,549<hi rend="superscript">⧺</hi> <hi rend="superscript">⧺</hi>ibid. of <del><gap/> per Cents</del><lb/>
<add>4 per Cents, <del>of</del></add> is per annum – £452,704<lb/>
Making together, per annum – £1,417,704</p>
<p>Besides 5 to 6 other inferior sources of profit<lb/>
not worth particularizing in this view.  The amoung<lb/>
would however be more than the deduction<lb/>
for this over estimate <add>of the profit</add> in the Loyalty Loan 5<lb/>
per Cents, convertible optionally into 4 per Cents.<lb/>
Sixty million of principal money – added<lb/>
to about 1 1/2 million a year in Annuities<lb/>
– such is the profit over which, in the<lb/>
estimate of the learned Baronet, a supposed<lb/>
<del>deduction</del> possible loss – not of but upon a sum<lb/>
of £134,000 a year – of which supposed loss<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> not a penny<lb/>
might come to be<lb/>
realized – would<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>upon this <del>preponder</del></add> supposition<lb/>
preponderate.</note></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:58, 23 September 2024

Click Here To Edit

5 Aug. 1801

Quantity of Stock Annuities bought in, or
payd off, with this £60,000,000
of money at 85 as above – } 70,588,235.

Besides profit by reduction of 5 per Cents and
4 per Cent to 3 per Stock Annuities to
3 per Cent Note Annuities the (profit
by the difference between £3 per Cent, and
£2:19s per Cent being already reckoned) of which
profit the Annuity Note system will either have
been the cause sine quâ non, or a concurrent
cause to an indeterminable degree.

Two pe Cent upon £48,250,427 per annum upon £48,250,427+ + Commons Account No VI 17 Apr. 1801, p.9 of 5 per
Cent subject to correction for the Loyalty Loan) is per annum – £965,008
One per Cent per annum upon £45,269,549 ibid. of per Cents
4 per Cents, of is per annum – £452,704
Making together, per annum – £1,417,704

Besides 5 to 6 other inferior sources of profit
not worth particularizing in this view. The amoung
would however be more than the deduction
for this over estimate of the profit in the Loyalty Loan 5
per Cents, convertible optionally into 4 per Cents.
Sixty million of principal money – added
to about 1 1/2 million a year in Annuities
– such is the profit over which, in the
estimate of the learned Baronet, a supposed
deduction possible loss – not of but upon a sum
of £134,000 a year – of which supposed loss not a penny
might come to be
realized – would
upon this preponder supposition
preponderate.


Identifier: | JB/003/466/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-08-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

466

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e9 / f103

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

1876

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in