JB/055/057/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/055/057/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/057/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/057/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code or Procedure</head></p>
 
<p>In speaking of the adjournement, a description<lb/>
 
is given of the contents of the adjournement:<lb/>
 
in speaking of the <hi rend="underline">citation</hi>, a description<lb/>
is given of the contents of the citation:  Are<lb/>
they the same?  Why two descriptions at length?<lb/>
Are they different?  What reasonable ground can<lb/>
there be for the difference?  In both cases, the man<lb/>
is to do what he is bid, and it is the same in<lb/>
both cases:  to these and other such redundancies<lb/>
is the Code indebted for perhaps one half of its<lb/>
bulk.</p>
<p>In the Court called the inferior Court, it appears<lb/>
not that the parties whose lot is at stake upon<lb/>
the suit, are expected to make their appearance:<lb/>
their personal appearance, for in law without some such<lb/>
adjunct you can never tell what appearance is understood<lb/>
to mean.  From the Court which is to bring them to reconciliation,<lb/>
they cannot consistently with the words of<lb/>
the law be excluded.  When they are there for what purpose<lb/>
is it they are brought thither? the short answer<lb/>
is – to tell lies:  for keeping their language within the<lb/>
bounds of decorum provision is made;  for keeping it<lb/>
within the bounds of truth, none.  License for lies without<lb/>
stint being given to them for telling lies, it is upon<lb/>
the lies thus told that the reconciliation is to have its<lb/>
ground.  Is it possible that the penner of this Code.<lb/>
Should not have had among his designs, the giving birth<lb/>
to these lies, answer in the affirmative who can.  When</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:54, 3 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823 Decr.
Constitutional Code or Procedure

In speaking of the adjournement, a description
is given of the contents of the adjournement:
in speaking of the citation, a description
is given of the contents of the citation: Are
they the same? Why two descriptions at length?
Are they different? What reasonable ground can
there be for the difference? In both cases, the man
is to do what he is bid, and it is the same in
both cases: to these and other such redundancies
is the Code indebted for perhaps one half of its
bulk.

In the Court called the inferior Court, it appears
not that the parties whose lot is at stake upon
the suit, are expected to make their appearance:
their personal appearance, for in law without some such
adjunct you can never tell what appearance is understood
to mean. From the Court which is to bring them to reconciliation,
they cannot consistently with the words of
the law be excluded. When they are there for what purpose
is it they are brought thither? the short answer
is – to tell lies: for keeping their language within the
bounds of decorum provision is made; for keeping it
within the bounds of truth, none. License for lies without
stint being given to them for telling lies, it is upon
the lies thus told that the reconciliation is to have its
ground. Is it possible that the penner of this Code.
Should not have had among his designs, the giving birth
to these lies, answer in the affirmative who can. When


Identifier: | JB/055/057/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1823-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

54 or 24 - 57 or 27, 58 or 38

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

057

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code and Procedure

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C4 / D18

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1823

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1823

Notes public

ID Number

17778

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in