JB/055/101/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/055/101/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<note>Copied M<gap/>gent <gap/><lb/>
<note>Copied M<gap/>gent <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> Apr. 17.</note> <lb/>
<gap/> Apr. 17.</note> <lb/>
<note>I or IV<lb/>
<note><!-- In pencil -->I & IV<lb/>
Ch. IX.<lb/>
<!-- In ink -->Ch. <!-- In pencil -->IX<lb/>
S. defence how procurable<lb/>
<!-- In ink -->S. <!-- Continue in pencil -->Defence how procurable<lb/>
II. <gap/><lb/>
II. Mode<lb/>
III Judicators<lb/>
III Judicative<lb/>
<del>III <gap/></del></note><lb/>
<del>III Mode</del></note><lb/>


<head>Instructions <del><gap/> Instruc</del>ting?</head>
<head>Instructions <del><gap/> Instruc</del>ting?</head>
Line 29: Line 29:
<add>to wit</add> in respect of the collateral ends<lb/>
<add>to wit</add> in respect of the collateral ends<lb/>
because <del><gap/></del> in case of distance</p>
because <del><gap/></del> in case of distance</p>
<note>to bring about the <gap/><lb/>
<note>to bring about the incident<lb/>
presence mode with its<lb/>
presence mode with its<lb/>
advantages requires two<lb/>
advantages requires two<lb/>
Line 56: Line 56:
<del>and in case of new</del><lb/>
<del>and in case of new</del><lb/>
<del>-presence by<add>on</add> the length</del><lb/>
<del>-presence by<add>on</add> the length</del><lb/>
<del>of distance <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>of distance home</del><lb/>
<del>chiefly the difference</del><lb/>
<del>chiefly the difference</del><lb/>
<del>as to <unclear>clgilatates</unclear> <add>as a <gap/>ness</add></del><lb/>
<del>as to <unclear>clgilatates</unclear> <add>as a <gap/>ness</add></del><lb/>
3<lb/>
3<lb/>
Art 3. For the advantage<lb/>
Art 3. For the advantages<lb/>
from presence<lb/><lb/>
from presence<lb/><lb/>
see Ch. VI. <hi rend="underline">Jud. Appl</hi>
see Ch. VI. <hi rend="underline">Jud. Appl</hi>
Line 69: Line 69:
the Judges station was<lb/>
the Judges station was<lb/>
there supposed. But,<lb/>
there supposed. But,<lb/>
of the advantages, cases reaching such converse or in large proportion deprived by the nature of changes.</note><lb/>
of these advantages, cases reaching such converse or in large proportion deprived by the nature of changes.</note><lb/>


<p>Art 11. Whatsoever be the relation situation of the<lb/>
<p>Art 11. Whatsoever be the relation situation of the<lb/>
Line 87: Line 87:
semicircumference,<lb/>
semicircumference,<lb/>
with the addition produced<lb/>
with the addition produced<lb/>
by <gap/>nings and windings</note><lb/>
by turnings and windings</note><lb/>


<p>In point of eligibility, <add>relation law to</add> for the purposes here in<lb/>
<p>In point of eligibility, <add>relation law to</add> for the purposes here in<lb/>
question the difference forms upon the difference to have presence<lb/>
question the difference forms upon the difference to have presence<lb/>
and <del>difference</del><add>distance<add>non-presence</add></add> in between the <del><gap/></del> Judge and the individual <lb/>
and <del>difference</del> <add>distance</add> <add>non-presence</add> in between the <del><gap/></del> Judge and the individual <lb/>
who for the purpose of the suit as in reasons prescribed<lb/>
who for the purpose of the suit as in reasons prescribed<lb/>
by him to hold converse with him.</p>
by him to hold converse with him.</p>


Of the <add>use</add> advantage <del>which resulting</del><add>desirable</add> from the <gap/>stance<lb/>
<p>Of the <add>use</add> advantage <del>which resulting</del><add>desirable</add> from the <gap/>stance<lb/>
of mutual pursuer the particular have been <gap/><lb/>
of mutual pursuer the particular have been <gap/><lb/>
brought to view. <add>See Ch.VI Jud. Appl.</add> <del>They</del> The advantage <gap/> place with reference<lb/>
brought to view. <add>See Ch.VI Jud. Appl.</add> <del>They</del> The advantage <gap/> place with reference<lb/>
to both ends of justice the direct and the collateral: they are<lb/>
to both ends of justice the direct and the collateral: they are<lb/>
conducive to <gap/> of decision, and
conducive to rectitude of decision, and to minimization<lb/>
delay vexation and expence: ab<gap/>ng, This in the supposition<lb/>
that the <gap/> of the individual is, to practical purpose<lb/>
contiguous to the <del>abode</del> judicial abode of the Judge</p>


<p>But whom <add>instead of</add> <del><gap/></del> this contiguity the case exhibits<lb/>
<add>mutual</add> remoteness - <gap/>ness to the degree of which there were<lb/>
no limits other than those by the length of the<lb/>
<del>ca<gap/>th</del> more than half the ca<gap/> circumference, through<lb/>
senses in the alternative between journey on the part of the<lb/>
individual for the purpose of effecting the <add>desirable</add> <del>requisite</del> presence<lb/>
and converse at a distance: but in no other mode than<lb/>
the epistolary does the nature of things admitt increase between<lb/>
any two persons, otherwise than by the intervention of an intermediate Juryman <add>a</add> <note>mode of increase which<lb/>
under the same nature <lb/>
as in its nature widely<lb/>
difference and to purposes such as those in question altogether inadequate</note></p><pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:28, 9 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. April 2

Copied Mgent
Apr. 17.

I & IV
Ch. IX
S. Defence how procurable
II. Mode
III Judicative
III Mode

Instructions Instructing?

Art.1. Between Judge and individual part the advantageousness of
operated upon by him, modes of cau
two - 1. mutual presence mode
2. mutual distance mode

2

Art. 2. On the mere difference between presence
and non protions for the most part
|
part the advantageousness of
the oral musical presence mode: to wit no
respect of the direct mode of justice
on the length of the distance turn
the proportionable advantage
ness of the epistolary mode:
to wit in respect of the collateral ends
because in case of distance

to bring about the incident
presence mode with its
advantages requires two
Art.1. Bet Judge
and individual ordinary modus
of
1.
journey with intervening

present the
demonstrating; with

correspondent delay: and
2. Interlocutors not
with expence and vexation
present signs prment
as a danage proposed
mode apartrary
to length of terms,
as a journey, to length of
time, and besides to length
distance.
3
Art.2 On distance
between
non presence,
and in case of new
-presence byon the length
of distance home
chiefly the difference
as to clgilatates as a ness
3
Art 3. For the advantages
from presence

see Ch. VI. Jud. Appl S. Urda oral. They
apply to both ends of
Justice Contiguity of
the individuals abide to
the Judges station was
there supposed. But,
of these advantages, cases reaching such converse or in large proportion deprived by the nature of changes.

Art 11. Whatsoever be the relation situation of the
individual pursuer defendant or witness for holdingcommencing
and maintaining intercourse with him there will be in every secure the two modes of
the oral and the bolary: courses by evanescent signs
converse by durable permanent signs.

4
Art.4. To contiguity substitute
distance, thereupon
to produce presence comes
need of journey by individual
to Justice Chamber:
maximum of length
not less than the earths
semicircumference,
with the addition produced
by turnings and windings

In point of eligibility, relation law to for the purposes here in
question the difference forms upon the difference to have presence
and difference distance non-presence in between the Judge and the individual
who for the purpose of the suit as in reasons prescribed
by him to hold converse with him.

Of the use advantage which resultingdesirable from the stance
of mutual pursuer the particular have been
brought to view. See Ch.VI Jud. Appl. They The advantage place with reference
to both ends of justice the direct and the collateral: they are
conducive to rectitude of decision, and to minimization
delay vexation and expence: abng, This in the supposition
that the of the individual is, to practical purpose
contiguous to the abode judicial abode of the Judge

But whom instead of this contiguity the case exhibits
mutual remoteness - ness to the degree of which there were
no limits other than those by the length of the
cath more than half the ca circumference, through
senses in the alternative between journey on the part of the
individual for the purpose of effecting the desirable requisite presence
and converse at a distance: but in no other mode than
the epistolary does the nature of things admitt increase between
any two persons, otherwise than by the intervention of an intermediate Juryman a mode of increase which
under the same nature
as in its nature widely
difference and to purposes such as those in question altogether inadequate


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/055/101/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-04-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

101

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E1

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17822

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in