JB/055/168/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/168/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/168/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/168/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825 <del>May</del> June 29<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head><note>Ch. Evidence<lb/>
 
&sect;. Interrog. Epist<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi>  how</note></p>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Interrogation instrument</hi><lb/>
 
2 July 1929  Quere the general admission of information<lb/>
subject to exceptions.  Better <hi rend="underline">special</hi> for special cause,<lb/>
as in another leaf.</p>
<p><head>&sect;. Interrogation epistolary how</head></p>
<p>When on the occasion and for the purpose of a<lb/>
suit commenced <del><gap/></del> a proposed extraneous witness is<lb/>
subjected to examination, the Judge after having the inviting<lb/>
party or inviting parties, one one side or on both<lb/>
sides as the case may be, prescribes or approves the interrogatories<lb/>
contained in the <hi rend="underline">interrogation instrument</hi>.<lb/>
&#9758; Refer here to the Formularies for the form of it</p>
<p>Art. 2.  Exceptions excepted, along with the interrogation<lb/>
instrument, <add>for the instruction of the proposed witness,</add> he sends an exemplar of the Record,<lb/>
<del>containing the</del> exhibiting the proceedings down to that time.</p>
<p>Art. 3.  <add>Causes of</add> Exceptions are</p>
<p>1.  Apparent uselessness.  This applies to whatsoever portion of<lb/>
the matter of record affords not any prospect of contribution<lb/>
by the instruction afforded by it to the correctness or compleatness<lb/>
<del>of the</del> <add>clearness perspicuity</add> or promptitude of the proposed witness's testimony.</p>
<p>2.  Apparent perniciousness: <del>This applies</del> to wit by sinister<lb/>
instruction.  This applies to any information the effect of which<lb/>
would <del>be</del> probably be to enable the witness so to frame<lb/>
his testimony in any particular as although fallacious<lb/>
to escape detection and enable him to escape punishment.</p>
<p>Art. 4.  In addition to the information contained in<lb/>
the record, any such further information may be inserted<lb/>
into the interrogation instrument, as upon having parties as<lb/>
per Art. 1., the Judge <del>may</del> shall have regarded as <gap/><lb/>
to be contributory to the giving to the testimony the <del><gap/></del> qualities<lb/>
desirable in it, as per Art. 3.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:00, 17 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825 May June 29
Procedure CodeCh. Evidence
§. Interrog. Episty. how

Interrogation instrument
2 July 1929 Quere the general admission of information
subject to exceptions. Better special for special cause,
as in another leaf.

§. Interrogation epistolary how

When on the occasion and for the purpose of a
suit commenced a proposed extraneous witness is
subjected to examination, the Judge after having the inviting
party or inviting parties, one one side or on both
sides as the case may be, prescribes or approves the interrogatories
contained in the interrogation instrument.
☞ Refer here to the Formularies for the form of it

Art. 2. Exceptions excepted, along with the interrogation
instrument, for the instruction of the proposed witness, he sends an exemplar of the Record,
containing the exhibiting the proceedings down to that time.

Art. 3. Causes of Exceptions are

1. Apparent uselessness. This applies to whatsoever portion of
the matter of record affords not any prospect of contribution
by the instruction afforded by it to the correctness or compleatness
of the clearness perspicuity or promptitude of the proposed witness's testimony.

2. Apparent perniciousness: This applies to wit by sinister
instruction. This applies to any information the effect of which
would be probably be to enable the witness so to frame
his testimony in any particular as although fallacious
to escape detection and enable him to escape punishment.

Art. 4. In addition to the information contained in
the record, any such further information may be inserted
into the interrogation instrument, as upon having parties as
per Art. 1., the Judge may shall have regarded as
to be contributory to the giving to the testimony the qualities
desirable in it, as per Art. 3.


Identifier: | JB/055/168/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-06-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

168

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17889

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in