★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/055/200/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/055/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1825. <del>March</del> April 1, 2<lb/> | |||
<head>Procedure Code</head></p> | |||
<p>Enactive</p> | |||
<p><del>Art. <gap/> or 3</del> IV. Cases exhibiting the maximum of advantageousness<lb/> | |||
on <del>the part of</del> the part of the <hi rend="underline">mutual presence</hi> <add>or oral,</add> and <hi rend="underline">mutual distance</hi><lb/> | |||
or epistolary modes, in the originative and a post-originative<lb/> | |||
judicatory are as follows – ☞ Back to the margin</p> | |||
<p>Informative</p> | |||
<p>Only for general guidance, not for decrees <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
these observations, as to what will most commonly have<lb/> | |||
place, <del><gap/></del> of any case: only for information and general<lb/> | |||
guidance: for, if in the individual case in which it is<lb/> | |||
employed the <del><gap/></del> mode employed is not the most<lb/> | |||
apt, its being so in most or even all other <del><gap/></del> individual<lb/> | |||
cases will not be a justification for employing<lb/> | |||
it in this.</p> | |||
<p>Art. or 3. <del><gap/> I.</del> Case I. <del><add>Mode oral</add> Distance of the Defendants abode from the Judgment seat an inconvenience.</del> Judicatory<lb/> | |||
the originative Judicatory. <del>The</del> Distance of the Defendants<lb/> | |||
abode not greater than will admitt of his walking to<lb/> | |||
the Judgment seat time enough for <add>his</add> attendance, and returning<lb/> | |||
before he goes to rest. Complexity of the matter of his defence<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> <gap/></del> a minimum or a maximum – it <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
makes no difference. Rule I. <add>In this case,</add> <del>mode</del> <add>To</add> the oral mode <add>will</add> the<lb/> | |||
preference will <add>in general</add> be due.</p> | |||
<p>Art. or 4. Case II. <del><add>Mode epistolary</add> Distance of Def<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> Judicatory, as before the originative<lb/> | |||
judicatory. Distance of Defendants abode a maximum<lb/> | |||
<del>be it that a <gap/> which is</del> situate to wit within the<lb/> | |||
territory of that Judicatory <add>the Judgment seat of</add> which is the most distant<lb/> | |||
from that of the originative judicatory. Complexity of<lb/> | |||
the case a <del>maximum</del> minimum. Rule II. In this<lb/> | |||
case to the epistolary mode will in general the preference<lb/> | |||
be due – <del><gap/></del> understand always where <del><gap/></del> as per<lb/> | |||
Ch. §. backed by eventual re-examination, <del>to wit</del> <add>performed</add> in<lb/> | |||
by subsequential oral examination<lb/> | |||
at discretion, with responsibility,<lb/> | |||
compensational non<lb/> | |||
punitional on the spot in case of<lb/> | |||
falshood, as per Ch. ( ) §. ( )</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1825. March April 1, 2
Procedure Code
Enactive
Art. or 3 IV. Cases exhibiting the maximum of advantageousness
on the part of the part of the mutual presence or oral, and mutual distance
or epistolary modes, in the originative and a post-originative
judicatory are as follows – ☞ Back to the margin
Informative
Only for general guidance, not for decrees
these observations, as to what will most commonly have
place, of any case: only for information and general
guidance: for, if in the individual case in which it is
employed the mode employed is not the most
apt, its being so in most or even all other individual
cases will not be a justification for employing
it in this.
Art. or 3. I. Case I. Mode oral Distance of the Defendants abode from the Judgment seat an inconvenience. Judicatory
the originative Judicatory. The Distance of the Defendants
abode not greater than will admitt of his walking to
the Judgment seat time enough for his attendance, and returning
before he goes to rest. Complexity of the matter of his defence
a minimum or a maximum – it
makes no difference. Rule I. In this case, mode To the oral mode will the
preference will in general be due.
Art. or 4. Case II. Mode epistolary Distance of Deft
Judicatory, as before the originative
judicatory. Distance of Defendants abode a maximum
be it that a which is situate to wit within the
territory of that Judicatory the Judgment seat of which is the most distant
from that of the originative judicatory. Complexity of
the case a maximum minimum. Rule II. In this
case to the epistolary mode will in general the preference
be due – understand always where as per
Ch. §. backed by eventual re-examination, to wit performed in
by subsequential oral examination
at discretion, with responsibility,
compensational non
punitional on the spot in case of
falshood, as per Ch. ( ) §. ( )
|
Identifier: | JB/055/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-04-01 |
11 or 3 - 12 or 4 |
||
|
055 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
200 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
Enactive |
||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
C2 / E6 |
||
|
17921 |
|||
