JB/055/209/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/209/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/055/209/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/209/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/209/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. April 24<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head></p>
 
<p>Art. 11.  Of those two modes of discourse neither is<lb/>
 
with reference to the ends of justice, perfectly sufficient without<lb/>
 
the other.  <add>Unaccompanied by the written</add> Without the epistolary mode, the oral would to<lb/>
the first place permanence, and thence is liable to deficient in<lb/>
correctness and compleatness, and this in a degree encreasing<lb/>
with the length of time between the utterance and the use made <add>of it.</add><lb/>
<del>of it.</del></p>
<p>Art. <add>12.</add>  Without the oral mode, the epistolary is likewise<lb/>
liable to be deficient in those same <add>essential</add> qualities:  and is likewise<lb/>
<add>unavoidably</add> dogged by a degree <add>quantity</add> of delay <add>vexation and expence</add> which in the case of<lb/>
the oral mode, supposing <add>if</add> the contiguity <add>be</add> actually to have<lb/>
place, is altogether avoided <add>excluded</add>.</p>
<p>In respect of correctness and<lb/>
compleatness it is liable <add>comparatively</add> to be deficient, because in case of<lb/>
a desire to conceal or misrepresent facts, the distant mode<lb/>
affords so much more time for <del>accord</del> <add>purposed incorrectness or incompleatness</add> arming falshood against<lb/>
detection, and because in the oral mode the presence of<lb/>
a person <del>having</del> possessing adequate inducement to detect<lb/>
and expose incorrectness and incompleatness, operates as a<lb/>
check upon all such <del>intentional</del> misrepresentation whether<lb/>
produced by design or by negligence.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:23, 23 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. April 24
Procedure Code

Art. 11. Of those two modes of discourse neither is
with reference to the ends of justice, perfectly sufficient without
the other. Unaccompanied by the written Without the epistolary mode, the oral would to
the first place permanence, and thence is liable to deficient in
correctness and compleatness, and this in a degree encreasing
with the length of time between the utterance and the use made of it.
of it.

Art. 12. Without the oral mode, the epistolary is likewise
liable to be deficient in those same essential qualities: and is likewise
unavoidably dogged by a degree quantity of delay vexation and expence which in the case of
the oral mode, supposing if the contiguity be actually to have
place, is altogether avoided excluded.

In respect of correctness and
compleatness it is liable comparatively to be deficient, because in case of
a desire to conceal or misrepresent facts, the distant mode
affords so much more time for accord purposed incorrectness or incompleatness arming falshood against
detection, and because in the oral mode the presence of
a person having possessing adequate inducement to detect
and expose incorrectness and incompleatness, operates as a
check upon all such intentional misrepresentation whether
produced by design or by negligence.


Identifier: | JB/055/209/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-04-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-13

Box

055

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

209

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E4

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17930

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in