JB/055/243/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/243/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/055/243/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/243/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/243/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. March 8<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head></p>
 
<p>Art.  Whatsoever be the relation of the individual to the<lb/>
 
suit, if the individual with whom <add>between whom and the Judge</add> the intercourse is to have<lb/>
 
place, whether it be that of co-pursuers, defendant or extraneous<lb/>
the means of intercourse employed <add>in the first instance</add> will be one or<lb/>
other of those three – to wit, oral in the Justice Chamber,<lb/>
2. epistolary; or 3. oral at a place other than the Justice<lb/>
Chamber:  for example, the abode of the examinee in case<lb/>
of his illness;  or any place to which <del>it is has been</del> the Judge<lb/>
may have to pay a judicial <hi rend="underline">visit</hi> for the purpose of a judicial<lb/>
view.  <hi rend="underline">Ordinary</hi> are termed the two first mentioned modes;<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">extraordinary</hi> the third.</p>
<p>Art.  In <del>every one of those</del> <add>either of those two ordinary</add> cases the commencement<lb/>
of this ulterior intercourse, subsequent to the first <add>and initiatory</add>, or in<lb/>
some cases as above, only hearing, will be by a written<lb/>
instrument termed a <hi rend="underline"><add>judicial</add> mandate</hi> if any <add>emanating</add> from the Judge:<lb/>
which mandate will accordingly be an instrument<lb/>
of communication <add>intercourse</add> in the epistolary form.</p>
<p>Art.  By it, <del>one or other</del> compliance will be<lb/>
required in one or other of two shapes – to wit  1. that if attendance<lb/>
to wit at the Justice Chamber for the purpose of<lb/>
undergoing examination;  or 2. that of <hi rend="underline">responsion</hi> – to wit<lb/>
making answer to the judicial missive sent, <add>responsion,</add> and this without<lb/>
need of such examination <add>attendance</add>.</p>
<p>In the first case the mandate will be an <del>respons</del><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Attendance ordering</hi> mandate:  in the other case a <hi rend="underline">Responsion<lb/>
ordering</hi> mandate.</p>
<p>Every <add>judicial</add> mandate that <add>which</add> is not an Attendance-ordering<lb/>
is a Responsion-ordering <del><gap/></del> mandate:  for wheresoever the<lb/>
operation ordered to be performed is <del><gap/></del> abstained from is anything<lb/>
other than responsion, responsion indicative either of compliance or<lb/>
non-compliance <del>together with an ans</del> accompanied <add>with excuses</add> in case <del>of non-compliance</del></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:52, 28 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. March 8
Procedure Code

Art. Whatsoever be the relation of the individual to the
suit, if the individual with whom between whom and the Judge the intercourse is to have
place, whether it be that of co-pursuers, defendant or extraneous
the means of intercourse employed in the first instance will be one or
other of those three – to wit, oral in the Justice Chamber,
2. epistolary; or 3. oral at a place other than the Justice
Chamber: for example, the abode of the examinee in case
of his illness; or any place to which it is has been the Judge
may have to pay a judicial visit for the purpose of a judicial
view. Ordinary are termed the two first mentioned modes;
extraordinary the third.

Art. In every one of those either of those two ordinary cases the commencement
of this ulterior intercourse, subsequent to the first and initiatory, or in
some cases as above, only hearing, will be by a written
instrument termed a judicial mandate if any emanating from the Judge:
which mandate will accordingly be an instrument
of communication intercourse in the epistolary form.

Art. By it, one or other compliance will be
required in one or other of two shapes – to wit 1. that if attendance
to wit at the Justice Chamber for the purpose of
undergoing examination; or 2. that of responsion – to wit
making answer to the judicial missive sent, responsion, and this without
need of such examination attendance.

In the first case the mandate will be an respons
Attendance ordering mandate: in the other case a Responsion
ordering
mandate.

Every judicial mandate that which is not an Attendance-ordering
is a Responsion-ordering mandate: for wheresoever the
operation ordered to be performed is abstained from is anything
other than responsion, responsion indicative either of compliance or
non-compliance together with an ans accompanied with excuses in case of non-compliance


Identifier: | JB/055/243/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-03-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-14

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

243

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C5

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17964

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in