JB/055/260/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/260/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/260/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/260/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 13<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head></p>
 
<p>Art.  From comparison of those several Demand papers<lb/>
 
it may be seen that throughout the whole field of law as composed <add>covered by</add><lb/>
 
in their several divisions <add>sections</add> the subject matter requisite to be<lb/>
inquired into and brought to light in consequence of a suit<lb/>
of any kind are with <add>very</add> little exception the same:  and that the<lb/>
only exceptions are those constituted by the nature of the case<lb/>
in the case <del>of a</del> where <add>as on pages 60 and 72</add> service demanded of the Judge is of<lb/>
the punitive kind no room has place in those cases for<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> facts <add>of an</add> ablative nature with reference to the title to demand it<lb/>
nor for counter-demand at the charge of the person on the part<lb/>
of the Defendant side.</p>
<p>Art.  Thus moreover it is that, the more closely<lb/>
the subject is looked into, the more clearly it will be seen how<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> small in comparison of what has commonly been supposed<lb/>
or assumed, is the difference between the course most apt<lb/>
to be taken in the field of penal<add>right conferring</add> law and the course most apt<lb/>
to be taken in the field of non-penal <add>wrong-restraining</add> law.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:13, 29 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. Feby. 13
Procedure Code

Art. From comparison of those several Demand papers
it may be seen that throughout the whole field of law as composed covered by
in their several divisions sections the subject matter requisite to be
inquired into and brought to light in consequence of a suit
of any kind are with very little exception the same: and that the
only exceptions are those constituted by the nature of the case
in the case of a where as on pages 60 and 72 service demanded of the Judge is of
the punitive kind no room has place in those cases for
facts of an ablative nature with reference to the title to demand it
nor for counter-demand at the charge of the person on the part
of the Defendant side.

Art. Thus moreover it is that, the more closely
the subject is looked into, the more clearly it will be seen how
small in comparison of what has commonly been supposed
or assumed, is the difference between the course most apt
to be taken in the field of penalright conferring law and the course most apt
to be taken in the field of non-penal wrong-restraining law.


Identifier: | JB/055/260/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-02-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-7

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

260

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D7 / E3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17981

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in