★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/055/266/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/266/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/055/266/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1825. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 15<lb/> | |||
''This | <head>Procedure Code</head></p> | ||
<p>Art. 8. Case II. Suit <add><del>(as above)</del></add> inculpative but not criminative.<lb/> | |||
Alternatives, the same: to wit whether the <del>absentee</del> <add>supposed</add><lb/> | |||
<del>or whichever <gap/></del> <add>absent counter-issues are</add> on the pursuer's, or on the Defendant's side.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 9. Case III. Suit criminative, <add>thence penal</add> and purely<lb/> | |||
public. This case <del>is</del> admitts not of any such <gap/><lb/> | |||
as the above. <del>The</del> Pursuer, one only – the Government<lb/> | |||
Advocate. <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add></del> <unclear>Scarcely</unclear> by mutual consent can he, and<lb/> | |||
a Defendant or set of defendants, <del><gap/></del> all of them so<lb/> | |||
many supposed criminals and or suits pursued, <add>have</add> come<lb/> | |||
together as <del>here supposed</del> <add>per supposition</add>, at the first hearing, in <add>the</add> presence<lb/> | |||
of the Judge.</p> | |||
<p>Art. 10. Case IV. Suit criminative, <add>thence penal</add> and publico-private.<lb/> | |||
in this case <add>what may happen is that</add> an individual wronged – <del>an<lb/> | |||
individual <add>for example</add> as <gap/> of whose property has been taken in<lb/> | |||
the way of</del> <add>for example by</add> theft, <del>may by <gap/> have pretended and adduced</del> <add>having caught the supposed thief in the act</add><lb/> | |||
<del>the supposed criminal at or <gap/> <gap/> act <gap/></del> <add>prehended and adduced him: and thus</add><lb/> | |||
<del>the <gap/> is an <gap/>: and adduced moreover that<lb/> | |||
in the causes of the <gap/> individual the Judge <gap/> may be</del><lb/> | |||
in the course of the examination, reason may have been<lb/> | |||
seen by the Judge for supposing that the case has <del>afforded</del> <add>furnished</add><lb/> | |||
an accomplice or <del>set of</del> accomplices, <del><add>options of what would</add> <gap/> the Defendant<lb/> | |||
unless for hope of advantage to himself should made afford<lb/> | |||
indication of any <gap/></del> other than those whom the individual<lb/> | |||
wronged would willingly see punished.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1825. Feby. 15
Procedure Code
Art. 8. Case II. Suit (as above) inculpative but not criminative.
Alternatives, the same: to wit whether the absentee supposed
or whichever absent counter-issues are on the pursuer's, or on the Defendant's side.
Art. 9. Case III. Suit criminative, thence penal and purely
public. This case is admitts not of any such
as the above. The Pursuer, one only – the Government
Advocate. Scarcely by mutual consent can he, and
a Defendant or set of defendants, all of them so
many supposed criminals and or suits pursued, have come
together as here supposed per supposition, at the first hearing, in the presence
of the Judge.
Art. 10. Case IV. Suit criminative, thence penal and publico-private.
in this case what may happen is that an individual wronged – an
individual for example as of whose property has been taken in
the way of for example by theft, may by have pretended and adduced having caught the supposed thief in the act
the supposed criminal at or act prehended and adduced him: and thus
the is an : and adduced moreover that
in the causes of the individual the Judge may be
in the course of the examination, reason may have been
seen by the Judge for supposing that the case has afforded furnished
an accomplice or set of accomplices, options of what would the Defendant
unless for hope of advantage to himself should made afford
indication of any other than those whom the individual
wronged would willingly see punished.
|
Identifier: | JB/055/266/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-02-15 |
8-10 |
||
|
055 |
Constitutional Code; Procedure Code |
||
|
266 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
D13 / E4 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
17987 |
|||
