JB/055/267/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/267/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 37: Line 37:
had rather should not be examined.</p>
had rather should not be examined.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 30 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. Feby. 15
Procedure Code

Art. 23. Of the Cases in which after although all
the extraneous witnesses which the suit was had been supposed to be furnish have been adduced, need
may nevertheless be found for adjournment or for rendering the
decision provisional, the only examples are as follows.

Art. 24. In Case I. suit simply requisitive.
By the supposition Neither on the pursuers nor on the defendant's side, thence to the
time of the entrance into the justice chamber did not appear that
the case forwarded any material witness in addition to
the one or more adduced. But on the taking of the examination
by the Judge it what may have appeared to him is – that
either for the fiduciary benefit of the rightful interest of an interestee
or interestees present on one or other side, or of some co-interestee
not present of whose existence or of whose common interest
in the matter not one of them had been averse, prehension
will be necessary, the examination of some person or persons
in the character of extraneous witnesses may be necessary to
justice to the directs ends of justice.

Art. 25. Case II.

Art. 14. Case III. Suit penal purely public. In a
suit of this kind, scarcely can the supposition of a spontaneous mutual
attendance can not be ventured. Of the crime and the criminal
indication is made to the Judge afforded by some informant to the Judge
who thereupon consigns the pursuit to the Government Advocate.

Art. 15. Case IV. Suit penal purely publico-private.
Here it may be the the need of such ulterior evidence
may have place. The An individual wronged brings with him together
by force the Defendant taken in the act by invitation all such extraneous
witnesses one or more as he, knowing of, and at chooses to adduce
should be examined. But in the course of the examination, the
Government Advocate or the Judge may have seen reason to elicit the evidence
of others whom for
this or that reason the individual
had rather should not be examined.


Identifier: | JB/055/267/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-02-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-15

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

267

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D14 / E5

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17988

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in