JB/055/275/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/275/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/275/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/275/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. Nov. 19<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head><note>Ch. 1.  Stages of Procedure<lb/>
 
<del>&sect;.  State of enquiry here</del><lb/>
 
&sect;. 4.  Reiterated Enquiry</note></p>
 
<p><head>II.  <add><gap/></add> Second Stage – Reiterated or Quasi Jury Enquiry.</head></p>
<p>If at the first mutual attendance the case is in the<lb/>
eyes of the Judge ripe for decision he will pronounce his decision<lb/>
accordingly.  If further <add>any other</add> mutual attendance or attendances are<lb/>
regarded by him as requisite he will order them and procure<lb/>
them accordingly.</p>
<p>If at the end of any such chain of attendances it appears<lb/>
to him that the suit is ripe for decision without need of further<lb/>
attendance or evidence or <unclear>reclamation</unclear> of evidence already returned,<lb/>
he will proceed to judgment and deliver his decision<lb/>
accordingly.</p>
<p>If with the decrees thus pronounced parties on all<lb/>
sides are satisfied, <del>it is well</del> nothing better can be desired<lb/>
and <del><gap/></del> <add>on</add> no person in the character of Quasi Juryman is any<lb/>
vexation imposed.</p>
<p>If either party is to such a degree dissatisfied<lb/>
or <del>the Judge</del> for certain reasons which may have place the<lb/>
Judge himself is desirous of a reiterated enquiry, that same<lb/>
reiterated enquiry has place before a Quasi-Jury.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:57, 31 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. Nov. 19
Procedure CodeCh. 1. Stages of Procedure
§. State of enquiry here
§. 4. Reiterated Enquiry

II. Second Stage – Reiterated or Quasi Jury Enquiry.

If at the first mutual attendance the case is in the
eyes of the Judge ripe for decision he will pronounce his decision
accordingly. If further any other mutual attendance or attendances are
regarded by him as requisite he will order them and procure
them accordingly.

If at the end of any such chain of attendances it appears
to him that the suit is ripe for decision without need of further
attendance or evidence or reclamation of evidence already returned,
he will proceed to judgment and deliver his decision
accordingly.

If with the decrees thus pronounced parties on all
sides are satisfied, it is well nothing better can be desired
and on no person in the character of Quasi Juryman is any
vexation imposed.

If either party is to such a degree dissatisfied
or the Judge for certain reasons which may have place the
Judge himself is desirous of a reiterated enquiry, that same
reiterated enquiry has place before a Quasi-Jury.


Identifier: | JB/055/275/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1824-11-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

10-11

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

275

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D5 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17996

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in