JB/034/138/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/138/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/034/138/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/138/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/138/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. Sept<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 3</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
 
<p>Such, according to <add>the</add> concisest indication that can be given<lb/>
 
of them, are the features of the <add>here</add> proposed Quasi-Jury System, compared<lb/>
 
with the established, and so generally <add>extensively</add> and indiscriminatingly lauded Jury system.  In regard to some of these <add>their <gap/></add> features<lb/>
the qualities <add>apt and unapt of aptitude and inaptitude</add> respectively ascribed to them may be thought<lb/>
sufficiently proved by the bare statement above made of them:<lb/>
in other instances a few words of explanation may be thought<lb/>
to have their use.</p>
<p>1.  <add>Adopted feature.</add>  First as to those features which being found already existing<lb/>
in the Jury system, found disentangled from the rest, and approved<lb/>
have accordingly <add>in consequence</add> been adopted into the quasi Jury system:<lb/>
Jury adopted features.</p>
<p>Of the Jury system the characteristic excellence is expressible<lb/>
in one attribute – namely the operating with more or less force<lb/>
in the character of a bridle on <add>the otherwise</add> arbitrary power attached to the<lb/>
situation of professional and permanent Judge.</p>
<p><del>This off</del> The power by which this effect is produced is<lb/>
partly that of the <del><gap/></del> popular or moral sanction <add>as</add> brought into exercise<lb/>
by the Public Opinion Tribunal:  partly that of the <del>legal</del> political<lb/>
including the legal sanction:  namely in this case giving to this<lb/>
Committee of the Public Opinion Tribunal <add>on particular certain occasions</add> a share more or less<lb/>
considerable in the power exercised on all occasions by the only<lb/>
sort of <del>functi</del> judicial functionary to whom <add>which</add> the appellation of Judge<lb/>
is attached.</p>
<p>As to the <del><gap/></del> power of the popular or moral sanction it<lb/>
is capable of being applied to the case <add>subject</add> in question without having<lb/>
any <del>share of</del> legal power associated with it in the above or any<lb/>
other shape.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:04, 18 November 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823. Septr. 3

Constitutional Code.

Such, according to the concisest indication that can be given
of them, are the features of the here proposed Quasi-Jury System, compared
with the established, and so generally extensively and indiscriminatingly lauded Jury system. In regard to some of these their features
the qualities apt and unapt of aptitude and inaptitude respectively ascribed to them may be thought
sufficiently proved by the bare statement above made of them:
in other instances a few words of explanation may be thought
to have their use.

1. Adopted feature. First as to those features which being found already existing
in the Jury system, found disentangled from the rest, and approved
have accordingly in consequence been adopted into the quasi Jury system:
Jury adopted features.

Of the Jury system the characteristic excellence is expressible
in one attribute – namely the operating with more or less force
in the character of a bridle on the otherwise arbitrary power attached to the
situation of professional and permanent Judge.

This off The power by which this effect is produced is
partly that of the popular or moral sanction as brought into exercise
by the Public Opinion Tribunal: partly that of the legal political
including the legal sanction: namely in this case giving to this
Committee of the Public Opinion Tribunal on particular certain occasions a share more or less
considerable in the power exercised on all occasions by the only
sort of functi judicial functionary to whom which the appellation of Judge
is attached.

As to the power of the popular or moral sanction it
is capable of being applied to the case subject in question without having
any share of legal power associated with it in the above or any
other shape.


Identifier: | JB/034/138/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

39-42

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

138

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d12 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10412

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in