JB/047/005/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/005/002: Difference between revisions

Lucy (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/005/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/005/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><head>PERJURY. Prevarication  I</head></p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>There is [an offence] <add>a species of misbehaviour</add> of the nature of Perjury<lb/> which demands punishment on the same <lb/> principles, but which has scarcely yet been <lb/> considered as being within the line of it, I <lb/>
<head>PERJURY. Prevarication</head>
mean that of rendering a false account <del>of<lb/>the</del>  [sometimes by appearance but more commonly<lb/>
by device] of <add>intentions</add> motive &amp; inducements<lb/>
Now these body as much matter of fact as<lb/>
any other, with this difference that they are<lb/>
transacted in the mind of the party where they can<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">immediately</hi> be contemplated by him alone, instead<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> of being transacted in any <unclear>material</unclear> place</note>
<add>which</add> are no more inapt in their own nature to their<lb/>
being made <add>regarded as</add> foundations of Perjury, than any<lb/>
other</p>


<p>There is an offense<gap/><add></add> of the nature of Perjury<lb/> which demand punishment on the same <lb/> principles, but which has scarcely yet been <lb/> considered as being within the <unclear></unclear> of it, I <lb/> mean that of rendering a <unclear></unclear> account of <lb/> the  [sometimes by <unclear></unclear> but more commonly <lb/> by device] of </p>
<p>Incapable as they are, from this their notary<lb/>
of any <hi rend="underline">direct</hi> disproval, they are liable to<lb/>
a detection equally satisfactory as if they were<lb/>
and that in two ways:</p>
<p>1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi>  By pardon opposite declarations.</p>
<p>2<hi rend="superscript">nd</hi> By comparison with acknowledged facts,<lb/>
which, the nature of men being given, may<lb/>
be seen <del>sometimes</del> <add>have a connection</add> sometimes highly probable<lb/>
sometimes in a manner necessary, with intentions<lb/>
or motive inconsistent with those<lb/>
avowed.</p>


<p>For acts like these, which however <del>refus</del> <add>opposite</add><lb/>
to truth, &amp; repugnant to which,<lb/>
many persons might perhaps ill <unclear>brook</unclear><lb/>
to see involved in the appellation &amp; the<lb/>
Punishment of Perjury, a new name<hi rend="superscript">x</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">x</hi> (new I mean as thus applied)</note><lb/>
<add>&amp; punishment somewhat distinct</add> might perhaps with some effect<lb/>
be applied, that of <hi rend="underline">Prevarication</hi><lb/>
<add><gap/></add> <unclear>brung</unclear> <gap/> however (every external<lb/>
fact being agreed on) turn entirely on the<lb/>
question not only of intention, but even<lb/>
of nature, and the satisfaction of (those who<lb/>
are to judge) of the falsity of the allegations<lb/>
respecting those particulars is capable of being<lb/>
(<unclear>considered</unclear>) as compleat, as of the existence<lb/>
or non-existence of any visible phenomenon.</p>
<p>A Justice of the Peace<hi rend="superscript">x</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">x</hi> Information <unclear>RIS</unclear> Joseph <unclear>Deane</unclear> Esq<hi rend="superscript">r. M. 1773.</hi></note> being prosecuted by Information<lb/>
for a misdemeanour in refusing<lb/>
to renew the Licence of a Victualler<lb/>
for an unwarrantable cause:  viz. the <add><unclear>distinct</unclear></add> ground<lb/>
being of a nuisance upon the Highway<lb/>
in this affidavit swears, that he refused because<lb/>
the house was an house of ill <add>bad</add> form.</p>
<p>It may be said however, that for the punishing</p>
<p>He does not go so far as to swear, that the refusal was<lb/>
not on account of the nuisance:  and it</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:49, 27 November 2024

Click Here To Edit

PERJURY. Prevarication I

There is [an offence] a species of misbehaviour of the nature of Perjury
which demands punishment on the same
principles, but which has scarcely yet been
considered as being within the line of it, I
mean that of rendering a false account of
the
[sometimes by appearance but more commonly
by device] of intentions motive & inducements
Now these body as much matter of fact as
any other, with this difference that they are
transacted in the mind of the party where they can
immediately be contemplated by him alone, instead of being transacted in any material place which are no more inapt in their own nature to their
being made regarded as foundations of Perjury, than any
other

Incapable as they are, from this their notary
of any direct disproval, they are liable to
a detection equally satisfactory as if they were
and that in two ways:

1st By pardon opposite declarations.

2nd By comparison with acknowledged facts,
which, the nature of men being given, may
be seen sometimes have a connection sometimes highly probable
sometimes in a manner necessary, with intentions
or motive inconsistent with those
avowed.

For acts like these, which however refus opposite
to truth, & repugnant to which,
many persons might perhaps ill brook
to see involved in the appellation & the
Punishment of Perjury, a new namex x (new I mean as thus applied)
& punishment somewhat distinct might perhaps with some effect
be applied, that of Prevarication
brung however (every external
fact being agreed on) turn entirely on the
question not only of intention, but even
of nature, and the satisfaction of (those who
are to judge) of the falsity of the allegations
respecting those particulars is capable of being
(considered) as compleat, as of the existence
or non-existence of any visible phenomenon.

A Justice of the Peacex x Information RIS Joseph Deane Esqr. M. 1773. being prosecuted by Information
for a misdemeanour in refusing
to renew the Licence of a Victualler
for an unwarrantable cause: viz. the distinct ground
being of a nuisance upon the Highway
in this affidavit swears, that he refused because
the house was an house of ill bad form.

It may be said however, that for the punishing

He does not go so far as to swear, that the refusal was
not on account of the nuisance: and it


Identifier: | JB/047/005/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

005

Info in main headings field

perjury prevarication i

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

14873

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in