JB/003/408/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/408/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/408/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/408/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1 Aug. 1801</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>The very admission made by the learned<lb/><lb/>
 
Baronet in this very passage – the admission that<lb/>
 
"Country Bankers allow interest on deposits at their<lb/>
 
"Banks" – would have been sufficient to overturn <add>suppress</add><lb/>
the proposition it follows, had he but seen the force<lb/>
of it.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> If a man lends<lb/>
his money on a<lb/>
security (such as<lb/>
<del>that of</del> a receipt)<lb/>
unsusceptible of<lb/>
circulation, will<lb/>
be less ready to<lb/>
lend it (other<lb/>
circumstances<lb/>
equal) on a<lb/>
security possessing<lb/>
that advantage?</note>  What the admission predicates, it predicates<lb/>
of Country Bankers <hi rend="underline">in general</hi>:  in this sense at<lb/>
least it is as capable of being understood as in<lb/>
a more confined one.  But, if <del>people accept<lb/>
of</del> the proposed rate of interest (<del>to say nothing</del>  <add>not to speak</add> of<lb/>
inferior rates) <del><gap/></del> <add>meets with <hi rend="underline">general</hi> acceptance, when proposed by</add> an individual, with no other security<lb/>
than that of the individual – on the security<lb/>
of a receipt or note which binds nobody but that<lb/>
one individual for payment of the sum <add>so</add> deposited –<lb/>
if <del>this</del> <add>interest, engaged for on</add> a security thus slender, meets with acceptance<lb/>
all over the country – meets with acceptance<lb/>
everywhere – is it less likely to meet<lb/>
with acceptance, when the persons bound for acceptance,<lb/>
are as many of the Officers of Government<lb/>
as the holder or any of his acquaintances have occasion to pay money to on the score<lb/>
of taxes? – Does not this circumstance give the<lb/>
paper <hi rend="underline">some</hi> chance at least of circulation, even<lb/>
among <hi rend="underline">intermediate</hi> hands? <del>that is <gap/></del> <add>And who are these intermediate hands? –</add> all hands<lb/>
into which <del>property</del> money to the amount of the Note<lb/>
in question <del>finds its way?</del> could have found its way.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:47, 2 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

1 Aug. 1801

The very admission made by the learned

Baronet in this very passage – the admission that
"Country Bankers allow interest on deposits at their
"Banks" – would have been sufficient to overturn suppress
the proposition it follows, had he but seen the force
of it. If a man lends
his money on a
security (such as
that of a receipt)
unsusceptible of
circulation, will
be less ready to
lend it (other
circumstances
equal) on a
security possessing
that advantage?
What the admission predicates, it predicates
of Country Bankers in general: in this sense at
least it is as capable of being understood as in
a more confined one. But, if people accept
of
the proposed rate of interest (to say nothing not to speak of
inferior rates) meets with general acceptance, when proposed by an individual, with no other security
than that of the individual – on the security
of a receipt or note which binds nobody but that
one individual for payment of the sum so deposited –
if this interest, engaged for on a security thus slender, meets with acceptance
all over the country – meets with acceptance
everywhere – is it less likely to meet
with acceptance, when the persons bound for acceptance,
are as many of the Officers of Government
as the holder or any of his acquaintances have occasion to pay money to on the score
of taxes? – Does not this circumstance give the
paper some chance at least of circulation, even
among intermediate hands? that is And who are these intermediate hands? – all hands
into which property money to the amount of the Note
in question finds its way? could have found its way.


Identifier: | JB/003/408/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-08-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

408

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f45

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

1818

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in