JB/003/409/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/409/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/003/409/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/409/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/409/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->27 July 1801<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Annuity Notes</head></p>
 
<p><head>Observations continued –</head></p>
 
<p>"Exchequer Bills, which the Author<lb/>
 
"admitts (p.17) would rival his Notes of<lb/>
"£50 and upwards have never yet performed<lb/>
"the functions of money:  and I<lb/>
"<del>and I</del> believe Sir Francis Baring, in<lb/>
"his answer to Boyd (but I have not his<lb/>
"pamphlet at hand) gives several very substantial<lb/>
"reasons why they can not do so."</p>
<p><head>Counter-Observations –</head></p>
<p>"<hi rend="underline">The author admitts?</hi>" – no, indeed – I admitt<lb/>
no such thing. – One would think there<lb/>
<del>was a premium</del> <add>were a prize given</add> for incorrectness, and that our<lb/>
Baronet was <del>wishing</del> <add>wishing</add> for it.  The notes I<lb/>
<add>speak of – and</add> speak of – not <del>as</del> <add>merely as</add> being "<hi rend="underline">rivalled</hi>" in the<lb/>
market (the <del>expression</del> <add>word</add> is his own) but altogether<lb/>
thrown out of it – are "Notes <hi rend="underline">above</hi> the<lb/>
£<del>50:8</del><add>51..4<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></add> Notes":<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> p.17, Art. 13, Note 11.</note> because the next above the<lb/>
£<del>50:8</del><add>51..4<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></add> Notes are £<del>100:16</del><add>102..8<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></add> notes:  and <del>these</del> <add>Exchequer Bills,<lb/>
which at present yield upwards of 5 per cent,</add> being within the purchase of those whose stock<lb/>
of money in hand would enable them to<lb/>
receive these Notes, I <del>unders</del> durst not <add><hi rend="underline">at this time</hi>,</add> promise<lb/>
myself <del><gap/></del> for these <add>scarcely now 3 per Cent</add> Notes, any purchases<lb/>
upon terms of such comparative disadvantage.<lb/>
The difference<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> between <del><gap/></del> what he <hi rend="underline">supposes</hi> me to admitt and what I <hi rend="underline">do</hi> admitt</note> is prodigious: – look<lb/>
at D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/> Table<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi> p.155, 2 Edit</note> <del>(<gap/>)</del> you will <add>see</add> it goes<lb/>
to million's worths – <add>of –</add> if it be too much too<lb/>
say <del>of</del> <hi rend="underline">probable</hi> custom – at any rate <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">possible</hi><lb/>
custom – for these notes.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:48, 2 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

27 July 1801
Annuity Notes

Observations continued –

"Exchequer Bills, which the Author
"admitts (p.17) would rival his Notes of
"£50 and upwards have never yet performed
"the functions of money: and I
"and I believe Sir Francis Baring, in
"his answer to Boyd (but I have not his
"pamphlet at hand) gives several very substantial
"reasons why they can not do so."

Counter-Observations –

"The author admitts?" – no, indeed – I admitt
no such thing. – One would think there
was a premium were a prize given for incorrectness, and that our
Baronet was wishing wishing for it. The notes I
speak of – and speak of – not as merely as being "rivalled" in the
market (the expression word is his own) but altogether
thrown out of it – are "Notes above the
£50:851..4s Notes":+ + p.17, Art. 13, Note 11. because the next above the
£50:851..4s Notes are £100:16102..8s notes: and these Exchequer Bills,
which at present yield upwards of 5 per cent,
being within the purchase of those whose stock
of money in hand would enable them to
receive these Notes, I unders durst not at this time, promise
myself for these scarcely now 3 per Cent Notes, any purchases
upon terms of such comparative disadvantage.
The difference between what he supposes me to admitt and what I do admitt is prodigious: – look
at Dr Table+ + p.155, 2 Edit () you will see it goes
to million's worths – of – if it be too much too
say of probable custom – at any rate possible
custom – for these notes.


Identifier: | JB/003/409/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-07-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

409

Info in main headings field

annuity notes

Image

001

Titles

observations continued / counter-observations

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1 / f46

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

1819

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in