JB/003/414/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/414/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/414/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/414/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1 Aug. 1801</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>As to Sir Francis's evidence, it is on <hi rend="underline">my</hi><lb/>
 
side.<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>Observations on Boyd p.28</note>  <del>Arguing</del> <add>To prove</add> that the currency once proposed<lb/>
 
by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Boyd would not run –<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> (a currency in every feature of it different from the proposed Annuity Notes)</note> what he says on<lb/>
 
the subject of Exchequer Bills is in these words –<lb/>
<del>and it is all he says of these as to the point.<lb/>
that is in further remarkable</del> ..... "Although Exchequer<lb/>
"Bills carry an interest of 3 1/2 per day, they never<lb/>
"did serve the purpose of <hi rend="underline">general</hi> circulation<lb/>
"for the sake of a daily interest – the foundation<lb/>
"upon which the whole of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Boyd's plan rests.<lb/>
The word <hi rend="underline">general</hi> is in Italics.  These Italics<lb/>
are derisive.  They admitt the circulation,<lb/>
though they assert that it has its limits.  It<lb/>
would be strange indeed if it had not its limits.<lb/>
It would have its limits, if it had no other than<lb/>
those which <del><gap/></del> <add><del>conf</del> confine</add> the circulation of Bank Notes<lb/>
for the same sums:  and it has other limits.<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>See Infra</note>  <del>If<lb/>
these were pieces of gold coin <gap/> worth<lb/>
£100, their circulation would have the same limit.</del><lb/>
The same thing might be said of gold and silver money<lb/>
if there <add>were</add> pieces of it of that value.  The same<lb/>
thing may <add>actually</add> be said of guineas, in certain places:<lb/>
guineas do not serve the purpose of "<hi rend="underline">general</hi> circulation"<lb/>
among beggars – scarcely among day-labourers.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:50, 2 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

1 Aug. 1801

As to Sir Francis's evidence, it is on my
side.+ +Observations on Boyd p.28 Arguing To prove that the currency once proposed
by Mr Boyd would not run – (a currency in every feature of it different from the proposed Annuity Notes) what he says on
the subject of Exchequer Bills is in these words –
and it is all he says of these as to the point.
that is in further remarkable
..... "Although Exchequer
"Bills carry an interest of 3 1/2 per day, they never
"did serve the purpose of general circulation
"for the sake of a daily interest – the foundation
"upon which the whole of Mr Boyd's plan rests.
The word general is in Italics. These Italics
are derisive. They admitt the circulation,
though they assert that it has its limits. It
would be strange indeed if it had not its limits.
It would have its limits, if it had no other than
those which conf confine the circulation of Bank Notes
for the same sums: and it has other limits.+ +See Infra If
these were pieces of gold coin worth
£100, their circulation would have the same limit.

The same thing might be said of gold and silver money
if there were pieces of it of that value. The same
thing may actually be said of guineas, in certain places:
guineas do not serve the purpose of "general circulation"
among beggars – scarcely among day-labourers.


Identifier: | JB/003/414/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-08-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

414

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6 / f51

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

1824

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in