JB/055/197/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/197/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. May 17<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --><p><note><sic>Ch</sic> VIII <hi rend="superscript">?</hi></note><lb/>(17) <note>&sect; Demand paper Explanations</note></p> <p><add>How a correspondent substitute is here/all<lb/>along immediately <unclear>assured</unclear>:  refer to <gap/><lb/>Principle <unclear>Consists</unclear> of the <unclear>division</unclear> with<lb/>that into Right conferring and Wrong<lb/>repressing Codes.</add></p> <!-- paragraph crossed through in pencil --><p>The <del>substantive</del> adjective law has no other object<lb/>than the giving execution and effect to the substantive law.  The<lb/>relation it bears is therefore obvious the references it ought <del><gap/></del><lb/>all along to make to it inadmissible.</p> <!-- addition in pencil --> <p>69 or 56. Cases I. Non penal <del>are</del> 1. <add>Suit</add> simply <sic>requisitive;</sic> 2 <sic>inculpative</sic><lb/>or not but not criminative II. penal are 1. Suits criminative, evil purely<lb/>public: 2. suit criminative, evil publico-private.</p> <p>I.  Cases non penal are<lb/>1.  Cases where the suit is simply <sic>requisitive</sic><lb/>2.  Cases where the suit, <sic>inculpative</sic> or not, is not criminative</p><p>II.  Cases penal are<lb/>1.  Cases where the suit is criminative, the crime <add>offence</add> purely public<lb/>2.  Cases where the suit is criminative &#x2014; the crime <add>offence</add> publico-private</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:59, 3 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. May 17
Procedure Code

Ch VIII ?
(17) § Demand paper Explanations

How a correspondent substitute is here/all
along immediately assured: refer to
Principle Consists of the division with
that into Right conferring and Wrong
repressing Codes.

The substantive adjective law has no other object
than the giving execution and effect to the substantive law. The
relation it bears is therefore obvious the references it ought
all along to make to it inadmissible.

69 or 56. Cases I. Non penal are 1. Suit simply requisitive; 2 inculpative
or not but not criminative II. penal are 1. Suits criminative, evil purely
public: 2. suit criminative, evil publico-private.

I. Cases non penal are
1. Cases where the suit is simply requisitive
2. Cases where the suit, inculpative or not, is not criminative

II. Cases penal are
1. Cases where the suit is criminative, the crime offence purely public
2. Cases where the suit is criminative — the crime offence publico-private



Identifier: | JB/055/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-05-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

055

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

197

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C17

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17918

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in