JB/055/197/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:59, 3 December 2024

1825. May 17
Procedure Code

Ch VIII ?
(17) § Demand paper Explanations

How a correspondent substitute is here/all
along immediately assured: refer to
Principle Consists of the division with
that into Right conferring and Wrong
repressing Codes.

The substantive adjective law has no other object
than the giving execution and effect to the substantive law. The
relation it bears is therefore obvious the references it ought
all along to make to it inadmissible.

69 or 56. Cases I. Non penal are 1. Suit simply requisitive; 2 inculpative
or not but not criminative II. penal are 1. Suits criminative, evil purely
public: 2. suit criminative, evil publico-private.

I. Cases non penal are
1. Cases where the suit is simply requisitive
2. Cases where the suit, inculpative or not, is not criminative

II. Cases penal are
1. Cases where the suit is criminative, the crime offence purely public
2. Cases where the suit is criminative — the crime offence publico-private

Identifier: \| JB/055/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.
Date_1	1825-05-17	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	055	Main Headings	Procedure Code
Folio number	197	Info in main headings field	Procedure Code
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C17
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	17918
Box Contents

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/055/197/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p>1825 May 17<lb/>
-<head>Procedure Code</head></p>
-<p>How a correspondent substitute is <add>here</add> all<lb/>
-along immediately <unclear>assured</unclear>:  refer to <gap/><lb/>
-<gap/> <unclear>Consular</unclear> of this <unclear>division</unclear> with<lb/>
-that into Right conferring and Wrong<lb/>
-repressing Codes.</p>
-<p>The <del>substantive</del> adjective law has no other object<lb/>
-than the giving execution and effect to the substantive law.  The<lb/>
-relation it bears is therefore obvious the reference
-</p>
+<head>1825. May 17<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --><p><note><sic>Ch</sic> VIII <hi rend="superscript">?</hi></note><lb/>(17) <note>&sect; Demand paper Explanations</note></p> <p><add>How a correspondent substitute is here/all<lb/>along immediately <unclear>assured</unclear>:  refer to <gap/><lb/>Principle <unclear>Consists</unclear> of the <unclear>division</unclear> with<lb/>that into Right conferring and Wrong<lb/>repressing Codes.</add></p> <!-- paragraph crossed through in pencil --><p>The <del>substantive</del> adjective law has no other object<lb/>than the giving execution and effect to the substantive law.  The<lb/>relation it bears is therefore obvious the references it ought <del><gap/></del><lb/>all along to make to it inadmissible.</p> <!-- addition in pencil --> <p>69 or 56. Cases I. Non penal <del>are</del> 1. <add>Suit</add> simply <sic>requisitive;</sic> 2 <sic>inculpative</sic><lb/>or not but not criminative II. penal are 1. Suits criminative, evil purely<lb/>public: 2. suit criminative, evil publico-private.</p> <p>I.  Cases non penal are<lb/>1.  Cases where the suit is simply <sic>requisitive</sic><lb/>2.  Cases where the suit, <sic>inculpative</sic> or not, is not criminative</p><p>II.  Cases penal are<lb/>1.  Cases where the suit is criminative, the crime <add>offence</add> purely public<lb/>2.  Cases where the suit is criminative &#x2014; the crime <add>offence</add> publico-private</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/055/197/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:59, 3 December 2024

Navigation

Search