JB/003/486/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/486/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/486/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/486/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>here as before<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>&sect;. 12. p.</note> a pretty piece of work, for<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
the interest of a Note <add>of 5<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>2 3/4</add> bearing an interest<lb/>
 
"of 1/572 part of a farthing per diem"! to<lb/>
 
which I reply – out of one of the thousand<lb/>
 
passages he has <del>taken care</del> <add>been so careful</add> not to see –<lb/>
that according to such human probabilities<lb/>
as human creatures find it necessary on <del>all</del><lb/>
ordinary occasions to be governed <add>by</add> people will<lb/>
not be at this trouble and expence <del><gap/></del> in other<lb/>
than such cases "where the magnitude of the<lb/>
"sum"<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>Table II Note 24</note> (and he has my leave for adding the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">relative</hi> magnitude – relation being had to the<lb/>
pecuniary circumstances of the parties) "renders<lb/>
"it worth while.</p>
<p>I am altogether open to correction, as to<lb/>
this as well as all other points:  <add>but</add> I am inclined<lb/>
to suppose as it is interest, not principal</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Two</hi> parts – a hired piece and a <gap/><lb/>
piece – capable of division and <gap/> –<lb/>
every note, made out according to the form<lb/>
exhibited in Table II where it <del>stands exhibited</del> <add><unclear>waits</unclear> the<lb/>
honour of his glance,</add> if he would be pleased to look at it, <del><gap/></del><lb/>
contains already.</p>
<p><del>I hope</del> <add>After this specimen, I don't know whether</add> I may be fortunate enough to<lb/>
obtain credit with the learned Baronet for<lb/>
the very small degree of ingenuity that would<lb/>
be requisite for the framing of a <del><gap/></del> Note<lb/>
to the like effect according to a form which<lb/>
should render <add>it</add> divisible into <hi rend="underline">three, four,</hi> or<lb/>
even more parts:  if not, <del>I fear I am</del> my<lb/>
<add>case</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:21, 4 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

here as before+ +§. 12. p. a pretty piece of work, for
the interest of a Note of 5d2 3/4 bearing an interest
"of 1/572 part of a farthing per diem"! to
which I reply – out of one of the thousand
passages he has taken care been so careful not to see –
that according to such human probabilities
as human creatures find it necessary on all
ordinary occasions to be governed by people will
not be at this trouble and expence in other
than such cases "where the magnitude of the
"sum"+ +Table II Note 24 (and he has my leave for adding the
relative magnitude – relation being had to the
pecuniary circumstances of the parties) "renders
"it worth while.

I am altogether open to correction, as to
this as well as all other points: but I am inclined
to suppose as it is interest, not principal

Two parts – a hired piece and a
piece – capable of division and
every note, made out according to the form
exhibited in Table II where it stands exhibited waits the
honour of his glance,
if he would be pleased to look at it,
contains already.

I hope After this specimen, I don't know whether I may be fortunate enough to
obtain credit with the learned Baronet for
the very small degree of ingenuity that would
be requisite for the framing of a Note
to the like effect according to a form which
should render it divisible into three, four, or
even more parts: if not, I fear I am my
case


Identifier: | JB/003/486/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

003

Main Headings

manual of political economy

Folio number

486

Info in main headings field

alarm

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

d2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1798 a<…>

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

192100026

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in