JB/003/472/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/472/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/472/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/472/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->28 July 1801</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Observations continued</head></p>
 
<p>"When they (3 per Cent Stocks) are at par,<lb/>
 
"the public <del>(continues <add>our lecturer</add> the learned Baronet)</del> will<lb/>
 
"throw no benefit from this scheme, unless they<lb/>
"can issue Annuity Notes yielding only 9 3/8 per<lb/>
"Cent interest."</p>
<p>"The extension of the plan to paying off<lb/>
"public Annuities would in no case be practicable."</p>
<p><head>Counter-Observations</head></p>
<p>Of <del><gap/></del> This mass of argument, <del>as in <gap/> are</del> <add>with the sweeping</add><lb/>
denial that crowns it, <del>a counter-denial of equal extent will require, as <gap/> usual, to<lb/>
<gap/> denial must be opposed.  Position</del><lb/>
if I understand it right, the substance will be<lb/>
<del>direct information – implied inferences</del> <add>found to be contained in the two following <del>inferences</del> propositions.</add></p>
<p><del>To examine these, <gap/> <add>every</add> proposition of the learned Baronet, would I find it necessary to place them in an <gap/> the inverse of that in which his topic has arranged them<lb/>
thing is of a <gap/> in a I begin with <gap/> in<lb/>
be necessary the order in which for me to place the learned<lb/>
that invested order in which the logic of<lb/>
the <add>member</add> learned Baronet has arranged them.</del></p>
<p>1.  <hi rend="underline">Position</hi> – <add>"When Stocks (3 per Cents) are at par,"</add> Government will <hi rend="underline">not</hi> be able to<lb/>
"<hi rend="underline">issue, <add>Annuity</add> Notes, yielding only 2 3/8</hi> per Cent interest."</p>
<p><del><gap/> Direct</del> Inference.  Therefore, when Stock<lb/>
3 per Cents are at par "<hi rend="underline">the public will derive<lb/>
"no benefit from this scheme</hi>" viz. the issuing of<lb/>
Annuity Notes.</p>
<p><del>3.  Implied inferences.  Therefore (now that <add>Stock</add> 3<lb/>
per Cents want 40 per Cent if being at par)<lb/>
Annuity Notes ought not to be issued.</del></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:09, 9 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

28 July 1801

Observations continued

"When they (3 per Cent Stocks) are at par,
"the public (continues our lecturer the learned Baronet) will
"throw no benefit from this scheme, unless they
"can issue Annuity Notes yielding only 9 3/8 per
"Cent interest."

"The extension of the plan to paying off
"public Annuities would in no case be practicable."

Counter-Observations

Of This mass of argument, as in are with the sweeping
denial that crowns it, a counter-denial of equal extent will require, as usual, to
denial must be opposed. Position

if I understand it right, the substance will be
direct information – implied inferences found to be contained in the two following inferences propositions.

To examine these, every proposition of the learned Baronet, would I find it necessary to place them in an the inverse of that in which his topic has arranged them
thing is of a in a I begin with in
be necessary the order in which for me to place the learned
that invested order in which the logic of
the member learned Baronet has arranged them.

1. Position"When Stocks (3 per Cents) are at par," Government will not be able to
"issue, Annuity Notes, yielding only 2 3/8 per Cent interest."

Direct Inference. Therefore, when Stock
3 per Cents are at par "the public will derive
"no benefit from this scheme
" viz. the issuing of
Annuity Notes.

3. Implied inferences. Therefore (now that Stock 3
per Cents want 40 per Cent if being at par)
Annuity Notes ought not to be issued.


Identifier: | JB/003/472/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-07-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

472

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

observations continued / counter-observations

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1 / f109

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

1882

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in