JB/003/473/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/473/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/473/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/003/473/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->6 Aug. 1801</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>As to the <hi rend="underline">position</hi> – <del>on the</del> taking it as<lb/>
 
stands on paper – and as it appears to<lb/>
 
have been standing in the learned Baronet's<lb/>
 
mind – it is indispensably true, <del>little as</del> <add>but</add> his<lb/>
argument will <del>be</del> <add>not be much</add> the better for it.</p>
<p>According to the plan<add>itself</add>, while there are<lb/>
any Stocks <del>at</del> <add>at all –</add> any redeemable Annuities<lb/>
remaining in the form of Stock – unredeemed<lb/>
by Annuity Notes of the first issue – by<lb/>
Annuity Notes bearing £2:19<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> per Cent –<lb/>
no Annuity Notes of the second issue can<lb/>
be issued; – <del>because no second issue of Annuity</del> <add>for, by</add><lb/>
<del>Notes, at any that or any other reduced<lb/>
rate, is intended to be issued.  By</del><lb/>
the terms of the Article,<hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">+</hi>Art. 20</note> it is <del><gap/></del> "upon the redemption<lb/>
of the last parcel of redeemable Stock Annuities",<lb/>
<del>and this <add>the</add> cessation", of the commission of Note Annuities<lb/>
at this rate of interest, which <add>a</add> cessation is <add>which</add> by<lb/>
Art. 6<add>a mode</add> a necessary consequence of,</del> and not<lb/>
before, that <add>is</add> the Offices are to be opened for the<lb/>
"commission of a second issue at a reduced rate<lb/>
"of interest".</p>
<p>Taking it strictly then, the case <del>on which</del><lb/>
he mentions as a case in which "<hi rend="underline"><add>the public will derive</add> no benefit</hi><lb/>
<del>can be <gap/></del> from the plan",<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi>viz:  the case of Governments trying whether "they can commission Annuity Notes yielding only 2 3/8 per cent interest", and finding it impracticable,</note> is a case<lb/>
under <del>according to</del> the plan, against which he is <del><gap/></del> <add>urging</add> this argument,<lb/>
which <del>according to the plan itself</del> can never happen.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:10, 9 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

6 Aug. 1801

As to the positionon the taking it as
stands on paper – and as it appears to
have been standing in the learned Baronet's
mind – it is indispensably true, little as but his
argument will be not be much the better for it.

According to the planitself, while there are
any Stocks at at all – any redeemable Annuities
remaining in the form of Stock – unredeemed
by Annuity Notes of the first issue – by
Annuity Notes bearing £2:19s per Cent –
no Annuity Notes of the second issue can
be issued; – because no second issue of Annuity for, by
Notes, at any that or any other reduced
rate, is intended to be issued. By

the terms of the Article,+ +Art. 20 it is "upon the redemption
of the last parcel of redeemable Stock Annuities",
and this the cessation", of the commission of Note Annuities
at this rate of interest, which a cessation is which by
Art. 6a mode a necessary consequence of,
and not
before, that is the Offices are to be opened for the
"commission of a second issue at a reduced rate
"of interest".

Taking it strictly then, the case on which
he mentions as a case in which "the public will derive no benefit
can be from the plan", viz: the case of Governments trying whether "they can commission Annuity Notes yielding only 2 3/8 per cent interest", and finding it impracticable, is a case
under according to the plan, against which he is urging this argument,
which according to the plan itself can never happen.


Identifier: | JB/003/473/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

473

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2 / f110

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

1883

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in