JB/003/473/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/003/473/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 31: Line 31:
which <del>according to the plan itself</del> can never happen.</p>
which <del>according to the plan itself</del> can never happen.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:10, 9 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

6 Aug. 1801

As to the positionon the taking it as
stands on paper – and as it appears to
have been standing in the learned Baronet's
mind – it is indispensably true, little as but his
argument will be not be much the better for it.

According to the planitself, while there are
any Stocks at at all – any redeemable Annuities
remaining in the form of Stock – unredeemed
by Annuity Notes of the first issue – by
Annuity Notes bearing £2:19s per Cent –
no Annuity Notes of the second issue can
be issued; – because no second issue of Annuity for, by
Notes, at any that or any other reduced
rate, is intended to be issued. By

the terms of the Article,+ +Art. 20 it is "upon the redemption
of the last parcel of redeemable Stock Annuities",
and this the cessation", of the commission of Note Annuities
at this rate of interest, which a cessation is which by
Art. 6a mode a necessary consequence of,
and not
before, that is the Offices are to be opened for the
"commission of a second issue at a reduced rate
"of interest".

Taking it strictly then, the case on which
he mentions as a case in which "the public will derive no benefit
can be from the plan", viz: the case of Governments trying whether "they can commission Annuity Notes yielding only 2 3/8 per cent interest", and finding it impracticable, is a case
under according to the plan, against which he is urging this argument,
which according to the plan itself can never happen.


Identifier: | JB/003/473/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

1801-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

473

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2 / f110

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

1883

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in