JB/064/069/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/064/069/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/064/069/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/064/069/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>GB. 1828. Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 15<hi rend="superscript">th</hi><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head><del>Law Amendment or Duelling Extinguishable</del> Penal Code</head><note><del>Propositions</del> <add>B.III  Offences separately</add><lb/>
 
Ch. 1. Offences affecting the person<lb/>
 
Homicide<lb/>
 
Duelling<lb/>
&sect;. 6.  Def<hi rend="superscript">t's.</hi> Examination</note></p>
<p><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> 1.<lb/>
On Defendant's examination<lb/>
if he confesses<lb/>
Judges decree accordingly.</p>
<p>2.<lb/>
If he denies course<lb/>
to be pursued.</p>
<p>3.<lb/>
Course that the supposed<lb/>
challenger may<lb/>
pursue to shape his<lb/>
denial as to make it<lb/>
believed that he gave<lb/>
the challenge.</p>
<p>4. or 1.<lb/>
Evil to be guarded<lb/>
against challenger's<lb/>
desire to make public<lb/>
believe the challenge<lb/>
was given<lb/>
when Judge believes<lb/>
it not to have been<lb/>
given.</p>
<p>5. or 2.<lb/>
The stronger the asseveration<lb/>
elicited,<lb/>
the greater the probability<lb/>
of such endeavour<lb/>
being followed<lb/>
with success.</p>
<p>6. or 3.<lb/>
This asseveration<lb/>
may apply to past<lb/>
or to future conduct<lb/>
of challenger, or to<lb/>
both.</p>
<p>7. or 4.<lb/>
The more intense<lb/>
the asseveration, the<lb/>
more warranted the<lb/>
challenges in regarding<lb/>
the challenge<lb/>
as not having been<lb/>
given.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:17, 20 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

GB. 1828. Jany. 15th
Law Amendment or Duelling Extinguishable Penal CodePropositions B.III Offences separately
Ch. 1. Offences affecting the person
Homicide
Duelling
§. 6. Deft's. Examination

1.
On Defendant's examination
if he confesses
Judges decree accordingly.

2.
If he denies course
to be pursued.

3.
Course that the supposed
challenger may
pursue to shape his
denial as to make it
believed that he gave
the challenge.

4. or 1.
Evil to be guarded
against challenger's
desire to make public
believe the challenge
was given
when Judge believes
it not to have been
given.

5. or 2.
The stronger the asseveration
elicited,
the greater the probability
of such endeavour
being followed
with success.

6. or 3.
This asseveration
may apply to past
or to future conduct
of challenger, or to
both.

7. or 4.
The more intense
the asseveration, the
more warranted the
challenges in regarding
the challenge
as not having been
given.


Identifier: | JB/064/069/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 64.

Date_1

1828-01-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

4 or 1 - 7 or 4, 1-3

Box

064

Main Headings

Penal Code

Folio number

069

Info in main headings field

Penal Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

George Bentham; Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

20423

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in