JB/009/126/004

Click Here To Edit

I [...] in [...] : how this happened Whom [..] [...] appeal called courtroom had by [...] of this out (23 April 1708) [...] of : never [...] [...] return made by [...] now depending but elsewhere must have been bona fide over: so forth earlier rates so long ago as 25 March 1755. Now we have promoted [...] Commee Reps (represented in my hall) up of [...) (...) has whom appealed [...] year 1785 presumed 39: medium of [...] [...] 1787, [...] Esther any reach for reappearing in the smaller n° had been presented in 1709 or 1808? The number stated as "now depending" (29 April 1808) of those presented in 1718 for [...] but [...]: for [...], none. The whom one then[...], [...], must by their time have gone off. Being thus gone off the [...] at what [...] or time did they respectively go off won they all gone the day of maileing [...] [...] of the order [...] the guilt? of not may met this delay of of 20 days ([...] from the 9th [...] [..] 29th the day of Presentation) have been contrived for the purposing their going off, that they might not appear in the account?

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet a ras

Identifier: | JB/009/126/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 9.
Date_1	1808-05-24	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	009	Main Headings
Folio number	126	Info in main headings field	bentham writes to horner on the subject of writs of error
Image	004	Titles
Category	correspondence	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks	r williams 1796
Marginals		Paper Producer	c. hamilton
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1796
Notes public	letter 1968, vol. 7	ID Number	3427
Box Contents