JB/064/085/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/064/085/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/064/085/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/064/085/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>G.B. 1818. June 9.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Penal Code</head></p>
 
<p>53.<lb/>
 
Evidence a term of<lb/>
 
reference – preappointed<lb/>
evidence.</p>
<p>54.<lb/>
At first sight, it may<lb/>
appear best to present<lb/>
first to view the relation<lb/>
between husband<lb/>
and wife, as<lb/>
the source of all other<lb/>
relations.</p>
<p>55.<lb/>
But confusion the<lb/>
result – in the relation<lb/>
of husband and<lb/>
wife included that<lb/>
of Guardian &amp; Wife.</p>
<p>56.<lb/>
So that of Master and<lb/>
Servant.</p>
<p>57.<lb/>
Each relation would<lb/>
therefore be to be considered<lb/>
first mixed<lb/>
up with the two other<lb/>
relations, and afterwards<lb/>
separately, under<lb/>
it's own head.</p>
<p>58.<lb/>
One thing at a time,<lb/>
and where several<lb/>
objects must be considered<lb/>
together, as<lb/>
small a number<lb/>
at a time as possible.</p>
<p>59.<lb/>
Practical conclusions –<lb/>
1. Between penal<lb/>
and non-penal offences,<lb/>
no clear line<lb/>
of distinction.</p>
<pb/>
<p>60.<lb/>
2. In Penal Code, every<lb/>
act characterised as<lb/>
an offence, should be<lb/>
mentioned.</p>
<p>61.<lb/>
3. Definitions of offences<lb/>
ought to be given.</p>
<p>62.<lb/>
4. For the list of such<lb/>
offences, penal Code<lb/>
a proper receptacle.</p>
<p>63.<lb/>
5. Not necessary for<lb/>
the whole of expository<lb/>
matter to be in<lb/>
penal Code.</p>
<p>64.<lb/>
6. Remaining expository<lb/>
matter to constitute<lb/>
Civil Code, with<lb/>
reference to it from<lb/>
penal Code.</p>
<p>65.<lb/>
Examples as to expositions<lb/>
of the words<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">title</hi>, <hi rend="underline">right</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">interest</hi>.</p>
<p>66.<lb/>
Objections to this list<lb/>
of Offences.<lb/>
1. Superfluity &amp; needlessness.</p>
<p>67.<lb/>
2. Misplacedness their<lb/>
needless complication<lb/>
and disorder.</p>
<p>68.<lb/>
3. Excessive and needless<lb/>
severity and thence<lb/>
mischievousness<lb/>
of the Code.</p>
<p>69.<lb/>
These objections<lb/>
not overlooked.</p>
<pb/>
<p>70.<lb/>
First objection as to<lb/>
novelty of the names.</p>
<p>71.<lb/>
Answer – necessity of<lb/>
definitions, conveying<lb/>
clear and correct<lb/>
conceptions of<lb/>
the ideas.</p>
<p>72.<lb/>
Of the nature and<lb/>
mischief of the act,<lb/>
an intimation conveyed<lb/>
by the name.</p>
<p>73.<lb/>
So an indication<lb/>
of the place it occupies<lb/>
in the Code,<lb/>
and of the remedial<lb/>
proceeding provided<lb/>
against the extension<lb/>
of the mischief.</p>
<p>74.<lb/>
If the matter were inserted<lb/>
in the form<lb/>
of a groupe of ordinances,<lb/>
inconvenience<lb/>
would be the<lb/>
result.</p>
<p>75.<lb/>
Necessity of symmetry<lb/>
for the purposes<lb/>
of ultimate clearness,<lb/>
correctness and compleatness.</p>
<p>76.<lb/>
Object that domestic<lb/>
relationship<lb/>
being an aggravation,<lb/>
all offences,<lb/>
coupled with this aggravation,<lb/>
require<lb/>
separate consideration.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:59, 2 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

G.B. 1818. June 9.
Penal Code

53.
Evidence a term of
reference – preappointed
evidence.

54.
At first sight, it may
appear best to present
first to view the relation
between husband
and wife, as
the source of all other
relations.

55.
But confusion the
result – in the relation
of husband and
wife included that
of Guardian & Wife.

56.
So that of Master and
Servant.

57.
Each relation would
therefore be to be considered
first mixed
up with the two other
relations, and afterwards
separately, under
it's own head.

58.
One thing at a time,
and where several
objects must be considered
together, as
small a number
at a time as possible.

59.
Practical conclusions –
1. Between penal
and non-penal offences,
no clear line
of distinction.


---page break---

60.
2. In Penal Code, every
act characterised as
an offence, should be
mentioned.

61.
3. Definitions of offences
ought to be given.

62.
4. For the list of such
offences, penal Code
a proper receptacle.

63.
5. Not necessary for
the whole of expository
matter to be in
penal Code.

64.
6. Remaining expository
matter to constitute
Civil Code, with
reference to it from
penal Code.

65.
Examples as to expositions
of the words
title, right & interest.

66.
Objections to this list
of Offences.
1. Superfluity & needlessness.

67.
2. Misplacedness their
needless complication
and disorder.

68.
3. Excessive and needless
severity and thence
mischievousness
of the Code.

69.
These objections
not overlooked.


---page break---

70.
First objection as to
novelty of the names.

71.
Answer – necessity of
definitions, conveying
clear and correct
conceptions of
the ideas.

72.
Of the nature and
mischief of the act,
an intimation conveyed
by the name.

73.
So an indication
of the place it occupies
in the Code,
and of the remedial
proceeding provided
against the extension
of the mischief.

74.
If the matter were inserted
in the form
of a groupe of ordinances,
inconvenience
would be the
result.

75.
Necessity of symmetry
for the purposes
of ultimate clearness,
correctness and compleatness.

76.
Object that domestic
relationship
being an aggravation,
all offences,
coupled with this aggravation,
require
separate consideration.


Identifier: | JB/064/085/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 64.

Date_1

1818-06-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

53-76

Box

064

Main Headings

Penal Code

Folio number

085

Info in main headings field

Penal Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

B&M 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

Arthur Moore; Richard Doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

20439

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in