JB/056/040/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/040/003: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> <add>March 11 Revised.</add> D.<lb/>Procedure Code.</head> <p>Incuplative. Offence, Suit and case penal, and publico-private.<lb/>stated, for the purpose of the Judge's determination, whether to call upon<lb/>with the Demand, or to contest it.</p> <!-- this page is organised in two columns --><p>VI.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Collative fact <sic>alledged</sic></hi><lb/>This will be an individual act, belonging<lb/>to one of the sorts of <sic>wrongous</sic> acts, spoken<lb/>of under N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. IV: and as being constituted<lb/>offences by the collative portion<lb/>of laws as per N.<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> V.<lb/>[+]1</p> <p>VII.</p> <p><p><hi rend="underline">Proposed Defendant or Defendants: with<lb/> their several descriptions, as far as known<lb/>or believed,  together with the several means<lb/>of intercourse with them respectively, for<lb/>the purpose of the Suit, under the several<lb/>heads in <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">os.</hi></sic> I &amp; II mentioned.</hi></p> <p>VIII.</p> <p><p><add>Sources of the</add> <hi rend="underline">Evidence looked to in proof of the Collative<lb/>fact, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> VI.:</hi><lb/><del>Under this head will <add>not</add> be to be entered<lb/>on this paper, anything besides<lb/>the <hi rend="underline">sources</hi> of the Evidence known or<lb/> supposed to be obtainable</del> to wit, such persons, together with such writings, and such other things, if any,<lb/>as the Pursuers looks to in that character, for<lb/>support to their <add>respective</add>  demands.</p> <!-- a small piece of paper covers the remaining text in this column --><pb/> <p>X.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Counter-evidence, if any, from what<lb/>sources expected.</hi>.<lb/>Counter-evidence<lb/>is evidence either<lb/>in disproof of a fact, which, with reference<lb/>to the Pursuer's demand, is a Collative fact, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> VI., or in proof of a fact<lb/>which, with reference to it is an ablative<lb/>fact, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IX.</p> <p>XI.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Counterdemand, whether any, &amp; if any<lb/>what, according to the knowledge or belief<lb/>of the Private Pursuer, declared.</hi><lb/>Counter-demand, to wit a Demand on the<lb/>part of a proposed Defendant, at the charge<lb/>of such private Pursuer.  Any such counter-demand,<lb/>if just, will, according to <del>the</del> <add>its</add> value,<lb/><add>as compared with the value</add> of the corresponding Effective Services,<lb/>take away such Pursuer's right to <del>the Effective<lb/>Service</del> <add>it</add> as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IV.  But it will not<lb/>afford, as an ablative fact would, a ground<lb?>for the dismissal of the Private Pursuer's demand:<lb/>only for doing away or lessening<lb/>the amount of any <hi rend="underline">preliminary security</hi><lb/>which might be needful, for securing execution<lb/>to the Collative Law, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> V. &amp;<lb/><unclear>service</unclear> to the Private Pursuer the benefit of<lb/>Effective Service, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IV.  Much less<lb/>will it operate towards the dismissal of<lb/>Public Pursuer's Demand, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> II.</p> <p>XII.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Judicial Service demanded.</hi><lb/>This will consist in the performance of<lb/>all such judicial acts, as will be necessary<lb/>for the causing the Collative Law, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> V.<lb/>to receive execution and effect, &amp; thereby the<lb/>Effective service, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IV. to be rendered.</p>
<head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> <add>March 11 Revised.</add> D.<lb/>Procedure Code.</head> <p>Incuplative. Offence, Suit and case penal, and publico-private.<lb/>stated, for the purpose of the Judge's determination, whether to call upon<lb/>with the Demand, or to contest it.</p> <!-- this page is organised in two columns --><p>VI.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Collative fact <sic>alledged</sic></hi><lb/>This will be an individual act, belonging<lb/>to one of the sorts of <sic>wrongous</sic> acts, spoken<lb/>of under N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. IV: and as being constituted<lb/>offences by the collative portion<lb/>of laws as per N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> V.<lb/>[+]1</p> <p>VII.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Proposed Defendant or Defendants: with<lb/> their several descriptions, as far as known<lb/>or believed,  together with the several means<lb/>of intercourse with them respectively, for<lb/>the purpose of the Suit, under the several<lb/>heads in <sic>Nos.</sic> I &amp; II mentioned.</hi></p> <p>VIII.</p> <p><add>Sources of the</add> <hi rend="underline">Evidence looked to in proof of the Collative<lb/>fact, as per <sic>No.</sic> VI.:</hi><lb/><del>Under this head will <add>not</add> be to be entered<lb/>on this paper, anything besides the <hi rend="underline">sources</hi><lb/>of the Evidence known or supposed to be<lb/>obtainable:</del> to wit, such persons, together with<lb/>such writings, and such other things, if any,<lb/>as the Pursuers looks to in that character, for<lb/>support to their <add>respective</add>  Demands.</p> <!-- a small piece of paper covers the remaining text in this column --><pb/> <p>X.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Counter-evidence, if any, from what<lb/>sources expected.</hi>.<lb/>Counter-evidence<lb/>is evidence either<lb/>in disproof of a fact, which, with reference<lb/>to the Pursuer's demand, is a Collative<lb/>fact, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> VI., or in proof of a fact<lb/>which, with reference to it is an ablative<lb/>fact, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IX.</p> <p>XI.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Counterdemand, whether any, &amp; if any<lb/>what, according to the knowledge or belief<lb/>of the Private Pursuer, declared.</hi><lb/>Counter-demand, to wit a Demand on the<lb/>part of a proposed Defendant, at the charge<lb/>of such private Pursuer.  Any such counter-demand,<lb/>if just, will, according to <del>the</del> <add>its</add> value,<lb/><add>as compared with the value</add> of the corresponding Effective Services,<lb/>take away such Pursuer's right to <del>the Effective<lb/>Service</del> <add>it,</add> as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IV.  But it will not<lb/>afford, as an ablative fact would, a ground<lb/>for the dismissal of the Private Pursuer's Demand:<lb/>only for doing away or lessening<lb/>the amount of any <hi rend="underline">preliminary security</hi><lb/>which might be needful, for securing execution<lb/>to the Collative Law, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> V. &amp;<lb/><unclear>service</unclear> to the Private Pursuer the benefit of<lb/>Effective Service, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IV.  Much less<lb/>will it operate towards the dismissal of<lb/>Public Pursuer's Demand, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> II.</p> <p>XII.</p> <p><hi rend="underline">Judicial Service demanded.</hi><lb/>This will consist in the performance of<lb/>all such judicial acts, as will be necessary<lb/>for the causing the Collative Law, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> V.<lb/>to receive execution and effect, &amp; thereby the<lb/>Effective Service, as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi></sic> IV. to be rendered.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:48, 13 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1825. Feby. March 11 Revised. D.
Procedure Code.

Incuplative. Offence, Suit and case penal, and publico-private.
stated, for the purpose of the Judge's determination, whether to call upon
with the Demand, or to contest it.

VI.

Collative fact alledged
This will be an individual act, belonging
to one of the sorts of wrongous acts, spoken
of under No. IV: and as being constituted
offences by the collative portion
of laws as per No. V.
[+]1

VII.

Proposed Defendant or Defendants: with
their several descriptions, as far as known
or believed, together with the several means
of intercourse with them respectively, for
the purpose of the Suit, under the several
heads in Nos. I & II mentioned.

VIII.

Sources of the Evidence looked to in proof of the Collative
fact, as per No. VI.:

Under this head will not be to be entered
on this paper, anything besides the sources
of the Evidence known or supposed to be
obtainable:
to wit, such persons, together with
such writings, and such other things, if any,
as the Pursuers looks to in that character, for
support to their respective Demands.


---page break---

X.

Counter-evidence, if any, from what
sources expected.
.
Counter-evidence
is evidence either
in disproof of a fact, which, with reference
to the Pursuer's demand, is a Collative
fact, as per No. VI., or in proof of a fact
which, with reference to it is an ablative
fact, as per No. IX.

XI.

Counterdemand, whether any, & if any
what, according to the knowledge or belief
of the Private Pursuer, declared.

Counter-demand, to wit a Demand on the
part of a proposed Defendant, at the charge
of such private Pursuer. Any such counter-demand,
if just, will, according to the its value,
as compared with the value of the corresponding Effective Services,
take away such Pursuer's right to the Effective
Service
it, as per No. IV. But it will not
afford, as an ablative fact would, a ground
for the dismissal of the Private Pursuer's Demand:
only for doing away or lessening
the amount of any preliminary security
which might be needful, for securing execution
to the Collative Law, as per No. V. &
service to the Private Pursuer the benefit of
Effective Service, as per No. IV. Much less
will it operate towards the dismissal of
Public Pursuer's Demand, as per No. II.

XII.

Judicial Service demanded.
This will consist in the performance of
all such judicial acts, as will be necessary
for the causing the Collative Law, as per No. V.
to receive execution and effect, & thereby the
Effective Service, as per No. IV. to be rendered.



Identifier: | JB/056/040/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

040

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code Ch. VIII

Image

003

Titles

Demand Paper D

Category

Plan

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

[[notes_public::"March 11 Revised" [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

18096

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in