★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/248/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '[{{fullurl:JB/041/248/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1824. Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 20<lb/> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code</head><note>Ch. XIX Gov<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> Adv. General</note></p> | |||
<p>Under George the fourth <del>a <note></note></del> not to speak of Frederic the first<lb/> | |||
<add>Now</add> in what sense can any man be said to be safe. In the same sense as<lb/> | |||
every man <del>Suppos</del> might have been said to be sure under <gap/></p> | |||
<p><head><hi rend="underline">Instructional.</hi></head></p> | |||
<p>Suppose a <gap/> safe <add>in this sense</add> to <gap/> does it follow that<lb/> | |||
he will be a <gap/>? George the fourth is nt <del><gap/></del> at<lb/> | |||
any rate is not known to be an Orangist. But the Duke <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
not was but is universally known to have been – not<lb/> | |||
only an Orangist, but the very head of the Orangists: and<lb/> | |||
the Duke of York of <gap/> may be Frederic the first,<lb/> | |||
and the <del><gap/></del> <unclear>best</unclear> of Kings <gap/>. Being the its best<lb/> | |||
of Kings, and were he only one ordinary King, <gap/> thereby<lb/> | |||
<gap/> the Godlike incapacity of doing wrong, invested<lb/> | |||
by the matchless constitution with the power of converting<lb/> | |||
every thing that is wrong into every thing that is right<lb/> | |||
what should hinder him, what should restrain him from<lb/> | |||
being consistent <add>acting consistently</add> – from acting as a true <add>an</add> Orangist?<lb/> | |||
And <add>this animal called</add> a true Orangist what is he? What is he but<lb/> | |||
a <unclear>main</unclear> <del>loathed</del> <unclear>base</unclear>; <del><gap/></del> a league with the most<lb/> | |||
influential and powerful <gap/> of <del>the</del> <unclear>one</unclear> of the <gap/><lb/> | |||
kingdoms to secure impunity for whatsoever crimes<lb/> | |||
and more particularly for murder, as often as it<lb/> | |||
shall have been committed by any one of them for<lb/> | |||
the common purpose. <add>In the present case</add> The name indeed was withdrawn.<lb/> | |||
But in such a case does the <unclear>heart</unclear> follow the<lb/> | |||
name of course? The hand of necessity when its <del>grips<lb/> | |||
<gap/></del> grips is felt <del>does it</del> has it any such power<lb/> | |||
as that of lifting the <unclear>hand</unclear>? <del>Oh no:</del> on the contrary<lb/> | |||
does <del><gap/></del> it not <unclear>stick</unclear> it. Stubbonness and <gap/> determination<lb/> | |||
is in the heart so sure as contrition is in the<lb/> | |||
tongue.</p> | |||
<p>Under an Orangist King, or under a King by<lb/> | |||
whom those tygers in human shape are suffered to remain<lb/> | |||
<unclear>unwashed</unclear> can <add>the life of</add> any who has rested <add><gap/> fallen under</add> his displeasure<lb/> | |||
be said to be safe: Oh yes: just under Tiberius every man<lb/> | |||
was safe: nothing had any man to fear so long as there was<lb/> | |||
nothing in his conduct by which the feelings of the God upon each<lb/> | |||
the Emperor of that day had been <gap/>.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1824. Jany. 20
Constitutional CodeCh. XIX Govt. Adv. General
Under George the fourth a not to speak of Frederic the first
Now in what sense can any man be said to be safe. In the same sense as
every man Suppos might have been said to be sure under
Instructional.
Suppose a safe in this sense to does it follow that
he will be a ? George the fourth is nt at
any rate is not known to be an Orangist. But the Duke
not was but is universally known to have been – not
only an Orangist, but the very head of the Orangists: and
the Duke of York of may be Frederic the first,
and the best of Kings . Being the its best
of Kings, and were he only one ordinary King, thereby
the Godlike incapacity of doing wrong, invested
by the matchless constitution with the power of converting
every thing that is wrong into every thing that is right
what should hinder him, what should restrain him from
being consistent acting consistently – from acting as a true an Orangist?
And this animal called a true Orangist what is he? What is he but
a main loathed base; a league with the most
influential and powerful of the one of the
kingdoms to secure impunity for whatsoever crimes
and more particularly for murder, as often as it
shall have been committed by any one of them for
the common purpose. In the present case The name indeed was withdrawn.
But in such a case does the heart follow the
name of course? The hand of necessity when its grips
grips is felt does it has it any such power
as that of lifting the hand? Oh no: on the contrary
does it not stick it. Stubbonness and determination
is in the heart so sure as contrition is in the
tongue.
Under an Orangist King, or under a King by
whom those tygers in human shape are suffered to remain
unwashed can the life of any who has rested fallen under his displeasure
be said to be safe: Oh yes: just under Tiberius every man
was safe: nothing had any man to fear so long as there was
nothing in his conduct by which the feelings of the God upon each
the Emperor of that day had been .
Identifier: | JB/041/248/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-01-20 |
|||
041 |
Constitutional Code |
||
248 |
Constitutional Code |
||
001 |
Instructional |
||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
E10 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1823 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1823 |
|||
001 |
|||