JB/004/428/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/004/428/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/428/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/004/428/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1831 Oct. 19<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Bankruptcy Court Bill Observation</head></p>
 
<p>(1)<lb/>
 
&#9758; 25 Nov.  Query whether to employ this?</p>
 
<p>Question <del>from</del> as per Holy West – Is this be that<lb/>
should men?  <unclear>Answer</unclear>:  <del>No for it</del> as per the same – <del><gap/></del><lb/>
and accordingly, if Law Reform be what you wish here<lb/>
to effect or employ himself with any degree of success or<lb/>
endeavour to effect, you must look for <add>to</add> another.</p>
<p>That of the removal of the mark from a <unclear>certain</unclear> face<lb/>
the supposition of needfulness is not <del>groundless fanciful and</del><lb/>
ungrounded and purely fanciful, the following occurrence will<lb/>
suffice to prove.</p>
<p><gap/> a <gap/> at <del>this</del> a <gap/><lb/>
came <del>to me by the p</del>addressed to me post on the 7<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of this<lb/>
instant October 1831, a printed copy of a Resolution<lb/>
<del>in which the <gap/></del> from the terms of which it appeared<lb/>
that, relation had to Law Reform by the text <hi rend="underline">In le<lb/>
<gap/> confide</hi> if addressed to the Noble and learned<lb/>
<del>lord</del> Author of this Bill the sentiments of any <add>every</add> person<lb/>
who concerned in the <gap/> Bill would stand expressed.<lb/>
From this it will be seen how far from <add>it is</add> a matter of indifference<lb/>
it is that in Great Britain and Ireland in general<lb/>
not to speak of the rest of the British empire if such be<lb/>
indeed the case, it should be understood, that, on the<lb/>
occasion in question, whom it is that ventures to lean<lb/>
upon that reed, will find <add>feel</add> but too too sensibly, that<lb/>
he has been leaning on a broken one.</p>
<p>The man is <gap/> who hath not lent<lb/>
to <gap/> reed his <gap/><lb/>
says <del><gap/> <gap/></del> one of the <gap/> <gap/> versions of the<lb/>
first <gap/>.  As to the word <hi rend="underline">reed</hi> the sense in which it is<lb/>
used in this <del><gap/></del> instance is not exactly the same as that<lb/>
in which it is used in the first:  but for the purpose of <unclear>warm</unclear><lb/>
<hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi>, and planting it the more firmly in the mind, it may be not without its use.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> Under these circumstances<lb/>
it seemed good to me<lb/>
to transmitt to the influential<lb/>
Gentleman to whose<lb/>
<add>kind attention</add> I stand indebted for this <add>the</add><lb/>
communication, a copy<lb/>
of these Observations in<lb/>
so far as they had<lb/>
proceeded.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:54, 16 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1831 Oct. 19
Bankruptcy Court Bill Observation

(1)
☞ 25 Nov. Query whether to employ this?

Question from as per Holy West – Is this be that
should men? Answer: No for it as per the same –
and accordingly, if Law Reform be what you wish here
to effect or employ himself with any degree of success or
endeavour to effect, you must look for to another.

That of the removal of the mark from a certain face
the supposition of needfulness is not groundless fanciful and
ungrounded and purely fanciful, the following occurrence will
suffice to prove.

a at this a
came to me by the paddressed to me post on the 7th of this
instant October 1831, a printed copy of a Resolution
in which the from the terms of which it appeared
that, relation had to Law Reform by the text In le
confide
if addressed to the Noble and learned
lord Author of this Bill the sentiments of any every person
who concerned in the Bill would stand expressed.
From this it will be seen how far from it is a matter of indifference
it is that in Great Britain and Ireland in general
not to speak of the rest of the British empire if such be
indeed the case, it should be understood, that, on the
occasion in question, whom it is that ventures to lean
upon that reed, will find feel but too too sensibly, that
he has been leaning on a broken one.

The man is who hath not lent
to reed his
says one of the versions of the
first . As to the word reed the sense in which it is
used in this instance is not exactly the same as that
in which it is used in the first: but for the purpose of warm
, and planting it the more firmly in the mind, it may be not without its use.
Under these circumstances
it seemed good to me
to transmitt to the influential
Gentleman to whose
kind attention I stand indebted for this the
communication, a copy
of these Observations in
so far as they had
proceeded.


Identifier: | JB/004/428/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1831-10-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-16

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

428

Info in main headings field

bankruptcy court bill observations

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham; jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

2349

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in