JB/011/321/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/321/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/011/321/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/011/321/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1828 May 9</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Oh yes!  <add>For</add> If the removal of abuse <del>be</del> were suffered to begin, who<lb/>
 
knows where it <del>will</del> <add>would</add> end?  Such is the question which each man<lb/>
 
puts to himself:  such is the question which everyone puts to every other.</p>
 
<p>Sir <del>there were two parties <add>or of people or classes</add></del> in all Cabinets <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<gap/> at <gap/> <del>that <gap/></del> Honorable and Right Honorable, there<lb/>
are <del><gap/></del> constantly two sorts of men:  <del>constituting two</del> <add>two sorts of men, and as many classes and standing</add> parties<lb/>
that love themselves more than they hate the people;  and<lb/>
those who hate the people more than they love themselves.<lb/>
In the first you have the <gap/> class;  in the other the Castlereagh<lb/>
class.  Which of the two M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel belongs to, I know<lb/>
no more than he himself does.  <add>Not I indeed,</add> nor does it matter a straw.</p>
<p>What I do know, because it is what every body sees is –<lb/>
that <del>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></del> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel has bought into the form of Judge and C<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
<del>and</del> <add>whereupon instead of Judge and C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></add> Peel and C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> might be the name of it, <del>inasmuch if<lb/>
Judge and C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></del> but that by another such <del><gap/></del> blast<lb/>
as the Test Act gave him, he might <add>at any time</add> be blown out of it:<lb/>
while Judge and C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> will continue flourishing and<lb/>
encreasing its capital so long as a fee finds its way into<lb/>
the pocket of a Judge, or of a man <del>placed</del> <add>put into office</add> by a Judge.</p>
<p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel <del>being in the <gap/>, <gap/> <gap/> or <gap/> to</del> <add>having thus introduced himself, into the firm, hence</add><lb/>
one cause, though blindness may be another why to<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel consolidation is detestable, Codification unendurable.<lb/>
Consolidation detestable?  <add>why?</add>  because it <gap/> <del><gap/></del> trouble to <unclear>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></unclear><lb/>
in Statute bending, while to Law-<gap/> <del>the rule of action</del> <add>it leaves by leaving</add><lb/>
the <add>all-pervading</add> justice of Judge-made law <del>and</del> unexpelled, it leaves the rule of action<lb/>
<del>set</del> as <gap/> as ever:  <del>Consolidation</del> Codification,<lb/>
<add>unendurable?  Why?</add> because substituting everywhere real law to imaginary law –<lb/>
legislator-made to Judge-made law – it <del>puts</del> <add>would put</add> into the hands<lb/>
and lodge in the mind of every man his rights and his<lb/>
obligations:  giving him <add>thus</add> the benefit of <add>all</add> the rights professed to be<lb/>
conferred on him, and saving him from being punished<lb/>
for the non fulfilment of obligations the fulfilment of which<lb/>
had purposely been rendered and kept impossible to him.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:34, 16 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1828 May 9

Oh yes! For If the removal of abuse be were suffered to begin, who
knows where it will would end? Such is the question which each man
puts to himself: such is the question which everyone puts to every other.

Sir there were two parties or of people or classes in all Cabinets
at that Honorable and Right Honorable, there
are constantly two sorts of men: constituting two two sorts of men, and as many classes and standing parties
that love themselves more than they hate the people; and
those who hate the people more than they love themselves.
In the first you have the class; in the other the Castlereagh
class. Which of the two Mr Peel belongs to, I know
no more than he himself does. Not I indeed, nor does it matter a straw.

What I do know, because it is what every body sees is –
that Mr Mr Peel has bought into the form of Judge and Co.
and whereupon instead of Judge and Co Peel and Co might be the name of it, inasmuch if
Judge and Co
but that by another such blast
as the Test Act gave him, he might at any time be blown out of it:
while Judge and Co will continue flourishing and
encreasing its capital so long as a fee finds its way into
the pocket of a Judge, or of a man placed put into office by a Judge.

Mr Peel being in the , or to having thus introduced himself, into the firm, hence
one cause, though blindness may be another why to
Mr Peel consolidation is detestable, Codification unendurable.
Consolidation detestable? why? because it trouble to Co
in Statute bending, while to Law- the rule of action it leaves by leaving
the all-pervading justice of Judge-made law and unexpelled, it leaves the rule of action
set as as ever: Consolidation Codification,
unendurable? Why? because substituting everywhere real law to imaginary law –
legislator-made to Judge-made law – it puts would put into the hands
and lodge in the mind of every man his rights and his
obligations: giving him thus the benefit of all the rights professed to be
conferred on him, and saving him from being punished
for the non fulfilment of obligations the fulfilment of which
had purposely been rendered and kept impossible to him.


Identifier: | JB/011/321/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1828-05-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

321

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4018

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in