JB/034/121/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/121/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/121/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/121/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. August 25<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head></p>
 
<p><unclear>Give</unclear> here for <gap/> or <gap/></p>
 
<p><del>To</del> Under this system, with what prospect of success could<lb/>
 
a Judge pronounce <del>a judgm</del> a sentence or a conviction which<lb/>
in his own eyes were unjust?  Altogether unavailing would<lb/>
any such act be in opposition than that of its passing without<lb/>
opposition <add>through</add> the censorship of the Quasi Jury, and <del>after</del><lb/>
moreover <del>receiving and</del> finding <add>a congeniality of</add> conjunct guilt in the Appellate<lb/>
Judicatory.</p>
<p>Meantime the act being <del><gap/></del> in the eyes even of the Agent<lb/>
itself flagrantly <add>palpably</add> unjust, is it possible <add>can it in the nature of things</add> that it should <unclear>wear</unclear><lb/>
a more favorable aspect <del>not only</del> in the eyes <add>not only</add> of <del><gap/></del> observers<lb/>
altogether impartial, but of persons <unclear>leagued</unclear> <add>men <gap/></add> by a<lb/>
community of interest self-regarding and sympathetic<lb/>
with the supposed objects of the intended <add><unclear>undiluted</unclear></add> injury?</p>
<p>To these safeguards is moreover proposed to be added<lb/>
that of an <del>regular delay</del> established delay <add>established</add> for the express purpose of<lb/>
giving time to all persons in any way entrusted to <add>interpose and</add> make <add>their</add> application<lb/>
to the Appellate Judicatory.  Suppose this a sentence or conviction<lb/>
undecidedly unjust signed <add>pronounced</add> by the Judge Immediate<lb/>
what is the consequence?  Before execution can be given to it, the<lb/>
whole country rings with denuntiations of of the injustice.</p>
<p><add>Under the <gap/> <gap/> of a Jury</add> What security <add>safeguard</add> comparable to this is afforded by English<lb/>
practice.  When addressed <del><gap/></del> none to a careless and disdainful<lb/>
idler who <unclear>knows</unclear> <add>cares</add> nothing <unclear>about</unclear> the matter, in effect to nobody<lb/>
knows who, the nobody knows who without an <gap/> of responsibility<lb/>
in any shape <del>have</del> <unclear>stop</unclear> the hand by which the thread<lb/>
of life would be cut looks at the papers – <gap/> then by, <del>according<lb/>
to the fancy</del> <add>in the humour</add> of the moment <add>dictates</add>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:59, 16 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1823. August 25
Constitutional Code

Give here for or

To Under this system, with what prospect of success could
a Judge pronounce a judgm a sentence or a conviction which
in his own eyes were unjust? Altogether unavailing would
any such act be in opposition than that of its passing without
opposition through the censorship of the Quasi Jury, and after
moreover receiving and finding a congeniality of conjunct guilt in the Appellate
Judicatory.

Meantime the act being in the eyes even of the Agent
itself flagrantly palpably unjust, is it possible can it in the nature of things that it should wear
a more favorable aspect not only in the eyes not only of observers
altogether impartial, but of persons leagued men by a
community of interest self-regarding and sympathetic
with the supposed objects of the intended undiluted injury?

To these safeguards is moreover proposed to be added
that of an regular delay established delay established for the express purpose of
giving time to all persons in any way entrusted to interpose and make their application
to the Appellate Judicatory. Suppose this a sentence or conviction
undecidedly unjust signed pronounced by the Judge Immediate
what is the consequence? Before execution can be given to it, the
whole country rings with denuntiations of of the injustice.

Under the of a Jury What security safeguard comparable to this is afforded by English
practice. When addressed none to a careless and disdainful
idler who knows cares nothing about the matter, in effect to nobody
knows who, the nobody knows who without an of responsibility
in any shape have stop the hand by which the thread
of life would be cut looks at the papers – then by, according
to the fancy
in the humour of the moment dictates.


Identifier: | JB/034/121/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-08-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 25 - or 28

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

121

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / d13

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10395

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in