★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/190/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/054/190/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1825. <del>March</del> April<lb/> | |||
<head>Procedure Code</head></p> | |||
<p>Compared <del><gap/></del> with the <gap/>-epistolary mode<lb/> | |||
the transference oral <gap/> by transference will probably<lb/> | |||
in very few cases be found <add>the most</add> eligible.</p> | |||
<p><del>In <gap/></del> As to delay, in the case of transference inevitable<lb/> | |||
causes of extra delay are the following</p> | |||
<p>1. Need of <gap/> from the Judge of the originating judicatory<lb/> | |||
to the Judge of the Post-originating judicatory. What is <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
impossible is <del><gap/></del> – that to the Judge of the originating judicatory<lb/> | |||
it should be foreknown at what <add>earliest</add> day the business of the Post-originating<lb/> | |||
Judicatory will allow time for this <del>hearing</del> <add>extraordinary</add> additional<lb/> | |||
influx of business. The Judge of one judicatory can not<lb/> | |||
take upon himself the disposal <add>to dispose</add> of the time of a fellow <add>the Judge of another</add> judicatory.<lb/> | |||
Here then is one source of delay, and that delay indefinite.</p> | |||
<p>2. Need of response from the Judge of the Post originating<lb/> | |||
to the <add>above <gap/></add> Judge of the Originating judicatory.</p> | |||
<p>3. Need of communication <del>by</del> <add>or communications</add> from the Judge of the<lb/> | |||
Originating Judicatory to the applicant pursuer to inform<lb/> | |||
him of the day <add>or days</add>, if any, fixt by the Judge of the<lb/> | |||
Post originating judicatory for the oral examination of<lb/> | |||
the individual or individuals in question, <del>in the</del> each<lb/> | |||
in that one of those several capacities that belongs<lb/> | |||
to him.</p> | |||
<p>4. If at this stage in question there be individuals<lb/> | |||
<del>requisite</del> <add>more than one</add> in whose instance, whether in quality <add>the capacity</add> of Co-pursuers,<lb/> | |||
Defendants or Witnesses it may be necessary<lb/> | |||
that intercourse, oral or epistolary with the originating<lb/> | |||
judicatory should continue, notwithstanding such transference<lb/> | |||
as may <add>have</add> been made in other instances.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1825. March April
Procedure Code
Compared with the -epistolary mode
the transference oral by transference will probably
in very few cases be found the most eligible.
In As to delay, in the case of transference inevitable
causes of extra delay are the following
1. Need of from the Judge of the originating judicatory
to the Judge of the Post-originating judicatory. What is
impossible is – that to the Judge of the originating judicatory
it should be foreknown at what earliest day the business of the Post-originating
Judicatory will allow time for this hearing extraordinary additional
influx of business. The Judge of one judicatory can not
take upon himself the disposal to dispose of the time of a fellow the Judge of another judicatory.
Here then is one source of delay, and that delay indefinite.
2. Need of response from the Judge of the Post originating
to the above Judge of the Originating judicatory.
3. Need of communication by or communications from the Judge of the
Originating Judicatory to the applicant pursuer to inform
him of the day or days, if any, fixt by the Judge of the
Post originating judicatory for the oral examination of
the individual or individuals in question, in the each
in that one of those several capacities that belongs
to him.
4. If at this stage in question there be individuals
requisite more than one in whose instance, whether in quality the capacity of Co-pursuers,
Defendants or Witnesses it may be necessary
that intercourse, oral or epistolary with the originating
judicatory should continue, notwithstanding such transference
as may have been made in other instances.
|
Identifier: | JB/054/190/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-04 |
1-2 |
||
|
054 |
procedure code |
||
|
190 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
17709 |
|||
