JB/054/199/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/054/199/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>Beginning as he does with the operation and instrument of<lb/>
<p>Beginning as he does with the operation and instrument of<lb/>
<del><gap/> is</del> <unclear>summonation</unclear> he <del>makes it necessary</del> impose with<lb/>
<del><gap/> is</del> <unclear>summonation</unclear> he <del>makes it necessary</del> impose with<lb/>
<gap/> the necessary of <del>trusting <add>committing</add> his <gap/></del> resisting to expensive<lb/>
pursue the necessity of <del>trusting <add>committing</add> his <gap/></del> resisting to expensive<lb/>
and  
and sinistrously interested affection:  an individual man<lb/>
</p>
on reading in the <unclear>book</unclear> what on this occasion is required<lb/>
 
to be done, an uneducated <add>uninstructed</add> or <add>even</add> ordinary educated <add>instructed</add> man<lb/>
 
would never so much as conceive a hope <add>see in it a chance</add> of producing <add>forming</add><lb/>
an instrument that should answer <add>capable of answering</add> <del><gap/></del> the purpose:  an<lb/>
extraordinary instructed man <add>might</add> perhaps <del><gap/></del> entertain a<lb/>
conception to this effect, but the chances would be <unclear>many</unclear> to<lb/>
one against him if he trusted to it the <del><gap/> power</del> of<lb/>
the <add>ground of the</add> <gap/> is of course sufficiently provided <add><unclear>soaked</unclear></add> with pitfalls<lb/>
in the shape of <add>nullities</add> factitious causes of nullification:  <unclear>note</unclear> one<lb/>
of them great indeed could be his good fortune if the lawyer<lb/>
on the <add>other</add> side with the Judge naturally <unclear>leaning</unclear> on this occasion<lb/>
to that same side did not find a reason or a pretext<lb/>
for tossing him <add>pushing shoving dropping him</add> in.</p>
<p><add>When so it is that it is</add> It being thus necessary that the intended pursuer<lb/>
should <unclear>reach</unclear> to somebody for assistance, to what <add>good</add> end<lb/>
should it be rendered necessary for him to reach to any<lb/>
person other than the Judge.  That for <add>by</add> the <del><gap/></del> <add>attention which</add> whether it be<lb/>
that is necessary, the time of somebody must <add>on the occasion</add> be taken up <add>employed</add><lb/>
why not <add>that of</add> the Judge <add>who if paid</add> as well as that of an individual<lb/>
paid by the individual.  For whatsoever portion of time<lb/>
in the case of a functionary so constituted the public <add>it</add> is<lb/>
sure to be able to <add>can well afford to</add> pay:  against the individuals being able to<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> find wherewithal to pay, if at all without serious inconvenience, the chances are many to one:  in so far as the <unclear>deputistic</unclear> system extends, there will be no additional charge in the<lb/>
<gap/> to the public <del>whether the</del> be there occasions ever so numerous.</p>  
<p>Where an instrument for this purpose is produced whether it<lb/>
shall be regarded as apt with relation to the purpose will in any <add>either</add><lb/>
case depend upon the Judge.  Why then, for the <del>rendering it <gap/></del><lb/>
giving to it a <unclear>form</unclear> satisfactory to the Judge – why<lb/>
not resort to the Judge himself<lb/>
in the first instance?<lb/>
here will be known what is and what is not satisfactory to him if to any man.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:31, 20 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1823. Novr. 9
Constitutional Code. Bonaparte's Code

Beginning as he does with the operation and instrument of
is summonation he makes it necessary impose with
pursue the necessity of trusting committing his resisting to expensive
and sinistrously interested affection: an individual man
on reading in the book what on this occasion is required
to be done, an uneducated uninstructed or even ordinary educated instructed man
would never so much as conceive a hope see in it a chance of producing forming
an instrument that should answer capable of answering the purpose: an
extraordinary instructed man might perhaps entertain a
conception to this effect, but the chances would be many to
one against him if he trusted to it the power of
the ground of the is of course sufficiently provided soaked with pitfalls
in the shape of nullities factitious causes of nullification: note one
of them great indeed could be his good fortune if the lawyer
on the other side with the Judge naturally leaning on this occasion
to that same side did not find a reason or a pretext
for tossing him pushing shoving dropping him in.

When so it is that it is It being thus necessary that the intended pursuer
should reach to somebody for assistance, to what good end
should it be rendered necessary for him to reach to any
person other than the Judge. That for by the attention which whether it be
that is necessary, the time of somebody must on the occasion be taken up employed
why not that of the Judge who if paid as well as that of an individual
paid by the individual. For whatsoever portion of time
in the case of a functionary so constituted the public it is
sure to be able to can well afford to pay: against the individuals being able to
find wherewithal to pay, if at all without serious inconvenience, the chances are many to one: in so far as the deputistic system extends, there will be no additional charge in the
to the public whether the be there occasions ever so numerous.

Where an instrument for this purpose is produced whether it
shall be regarded as apt with relation to the purpose will in any either
case depend upon the Judge. Why then, for the rendering it
giving to it a form satisfactory to the Judge – why
not resort to the Judge himself
in the first instance?
here will be known what is and what is not satisfactory to him if to any man.


Identifier: | JB/054/199/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1823-11-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

054

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

199

Info in main headings field

constitutional code napoleons code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

17718

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in