JB/054/200/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/054/200/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/200/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code.</head></p>
 
<p>This <gap/> <gap/></p>
 
<p>In Bonaparte's Code, the idea of <hi rend="underline">conciliation</hi> is brought<lb/>
 
to view.  To one of his judicatures, the function of conciliation<lb/>
is professed to be attached:  namely that of the Justice of Peace<lb/>
though under the title as <unclear>denominated</unclear> no intention of any such<lb/>
function is to be found.  Litigation is a bad thing <add>practice</add>:  impositions<lb/>
and you check it.  Reconciliation is a <del>good thing:</del> benevolent<lb/>
function:  <del>how are a Judges</del> a Minister of Justice has an<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <gap/> be employed than in the exercise of it.<lb/>
Sources <add>and <gap/></add> of delusion both these observations:  devices employed<lb/>
by lawyercraft to blind the multitude and reconcile them<lb/>
to depredation and oppression.  Of the expression <add>notion <gap/></add> that<lb/>
litigation is <unclear>beneficially</unclear> repressed by taxes the delusiveness<lb/>
has been exposed elsewhere.</p>
<p><add>A judicator an instrument of</add> Reconciliation indeed?  Suppose the parties disposed to it.<lb/>
In the breasts of the parties suppose any such thing as a disposition<lb/>
towards the <del><gap/></del> <add>desirable</add> state of things there <unclear>mentioned</unclear>, no<lb/>
need have they of <add>the power of</add> a Judge:  <del>of <gap/> <gap/></del> he who <del>seems</del><lb/>
invites the <del><gap/></del> adverse party to a meeting for this purpose<lb/>
in the presence of a Judge might as well <del>give<lb/>
to</del> propose a meeting without any such oppressor <add><gap/></add> than<lb/>
person, and with as much time for it as they can<lb/>
mutually desire <add>agree in desiring</add>:  if a third person must <gap/> be added<lb/>
better if possible <del><gap/></del> common <unclear>friend</unclear>, or if <del>the</del> such an arbiter<lb/>
can not be obtained a stranger to both parties.<lb/>
Of such a meeting <add>the <del>alledged use</del> <gap/></add> is to receive from the Judge an opinion –<lb/>
the result <add><del>But the</del></add> of an exercise of the <add>his</add> <gap/> function.  The party<lb/>
who is <gap/> by it does not acquiesce in it:  why should<lb/>
he? what inducement or to do <gap/> <gap/>?  <gap/>: if to <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> decree the Judge in this as in other cases could<lb/>
<del>and</del> subjoin a correspondent imperative decree.  But <del>he was</del> <add>had</add><lb/>
he that power, the Judicator<lb/>
would not be the one in<lb/>
in question.  It would not<lb/>
in a Reconciliation Court:<lb/>
it would be an ordinary Court of Justice.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:32, 20 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1823. Novr.
Constitutional Code.

This

In Bonaparte's Code, the idea of conciliation is brought
to view. To one of his judicatures, the function of conciliation
is professed to be attached: namely that of the Justice of Peace
though under the title as denominated no intention of any such
function is to be found. Litigation is a bad thing practice: impositions
and you check it. Reconciliation is a good thing: benevolent
function: how are a Judges a Minister of Justice has an
be employed than in the exercise of it.
Sources and of delusion both these observations: devices employed
by lawyercraft to blind the multitude and reconcile them
to depredation and oppression. Of the expression notion that
litigation is beneficially repressed by taxes the delusiveness
has been exposed elsewhere.

A judicator an instrument of Reconciliation indeed? Suppose the parties disposed to it.
In the breasts of the parties suppose any such thing as a disposition
towards the desirable state of things there mentioned, no
need have they of the power of a Judge: of he who seems
invites the adverse party to a meeting for this purpose
in the presence of a Judge might as well give
to
propose a meeting without any such oppressor than
person, and with as much time for it as they can
mutually desire agree in desiring: if a third person must be added
better if possible common friend, or if the such an arbiter
can not be obtained a stranger to both parties.
Of such a meeting the alledged use is to receive from the Judge an opinion –
the result But the of an exercise of the his function. The party
who is by it does not acquiesce in it: why should
he? what inducement or to do ? : if to
decree the Judge in this as in other cases could
and subjoin a correspondent imperative decree. But he was had
he that power, the Judicator
would not be the one in
in question. It would not
in a Reconciliation Court:
it would be an ordinary Court of Justice.


Identifier: | JB/054/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1823-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

054

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

constitutional code bonaparte

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / e1?

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17719

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in