JB/056/059/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/059/002: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/056/059/002": completed ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1823. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 26<lb/>Constitutional Code</head> <p><note>1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>  2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Suits <add>their sorts &amp;c</add><lb/>&sect;.6.|4 <add>suits amicable and</add><lb/>&sect; Consultative</note></p> <p><add>Reasons contra danger of collection for<lb/>obtaining a precedent. <del><foreign>Quere</foreign></del></add></p> <!-- all text on the page crossed through in ink --> <p><sic>Art.</sic> A conceivable suit of this kind is <del>that</del> a<lb/>suit having for its object the <del><gap/></del> ascertaining <del>what would<lb/><gap/></del> <sic>antecedently</sic> to <del><gap/></del> <add>judicial</add> demand grounded in a certain<lb/>portion of the law which in the event of a suit grounded on<lb/>it would be the interpretation put upon it by the Judge.</p> <p>The <del><add>To give</add> allowance to a suit of the kind</del> conceivable yet<lb/>preponderantly useful ad thence desirable use.  On one side  <del><gap/></del><lb/>here would be individual interest: on the other side, how<lb/><del>immediate so ever the pr</del> <add>decidedly so ever preponderant</add> the damage to others individual<lb/>interest from the interpretation prayed as opportunity for<lb/><add>support/adequate to</add> those same individual interests: on the one side due would be<lb/>a hearting on behalf of the party on that side: on the other side<lb/>no such hearing.  <del>If in</del> True it is that if <del><gap/></del> the demand<lb/>if unjust the <gap/> might not improbably be diluted by<lb/>the Judge, but as this is not accepted as a reason for refusing to<lb/>one party the benefit of a hearing in case in general so therefore<lb/>neither ought <add>should</add> it in this case in particular.</p> <p>In a case of this sort the proper and only proper question <add>authority</add><lb/>to apply to a Legislature.  By the Legislature if considered at all<lb/>the subject would be <add>naturally</add> considered in all its bearings and with relation<lb/>to all interests in any way concerned or about to be concerned. <del>To<lb/>apply to the Judge</del> An application to the Judge would be an application<lb/>to him to declare what is his offence <add>in relation to the <gap/> in question</add> is the meaning of the legislation<Lb/>was and is the will and meaning of the Legislature.  But<lb/><del>neither can it</del> in his situation the Judge it can not be <del><gap/></del><lb/>so surely know either or what is or what might be to be the will<lb/>and meaning of the Legislature <del>itself as</del> as to the Legislature<lb/>itself.</p> <p>In this case provision is accordingly made for maximizing<lb/>the faculty of obtaining in every such question <gap/> <add>from the proper quarter</add> of the<lb?>will and meaning of the Legislator.  But if exclusion be put upon<lb/>the practice of applying for a purpose of this sort to the Judge the usefulness<lb>of it must depend upon the <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> which <del><gap/></del> such application informs<lb/>a <gap/> at the hands of the Legislature.  If though influence or<lb?><!-- continues in the margin --> an inconceivable preoccupation<lb/>the Legislature <del><gap/></del> <add>suffers</add> the<lb/>doubts or question <add>to be</add> unresolved,<lb/>better the <del><gap/></del>,lb/><!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page --> duty had better be performed by the Judge than left <add>altogether</add> unperformed.  should the Legislature trust the <gap/> without examination to the <gap/> <del>it would</del> negligence and dereliction<lb/>of duty with which it would be <gap/> <del><gap/><?del> as to these <gap/> and <gap/> points in question in the field of judicature is no other than these: that which is <del><gap/></del> <gap/><add>manifested</add><lb/>manifested in relation to the whole extent<lb/>of the field of law and judicature by the<lb/><del><gap/></del> authority allowed to the boundless<lb/>mass of Judge under <gap/> called Common Law.</p>
<head>1823. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 26<lb/>Constitutional Code</head> <p><note>1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>  2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Suits <add>their sorts &amp;c</add><lb/>&sect;.6.|4 <add>suits amicable and</add><lb/>&sect; Consultative</note></p> <p><add>Reasons contra danger of collection for<lb/>obtaining a precedent. <del><foreign>Quere</foreign></del></add></p> <!-- all text on the page crossed through in ink --> <p><sic>Art.</sic> A conceivable suit of this kind is <del>that</del> a<lb/>suit having for its object the <del><gap/></del> ascertaining <del>what would<lb/><gap/></del> <sic>antecedently</sic> to <del><gap/></del> <add>judicial</add> demand grounded in a certain<lb/>portion of the law which in the event of a suit grounded on<lb/>it would be the interpretation put upon it by the Judge.</p> <p>The <del><add>To give</add> allowance to a suit of the kind</del> conceivable yet<lb/>preponderantly useful ad thence desirable use.  On one side  <del><gap/></del><lb/>here would be individual interest: on the other side, how<lb/><del>immediate so ever the pr</del> <add>decidedly so ever preponderant</add> the damage to others individual<lb/>interest from the interpretation prayed as opportunity for<lb/><add>support/adequate to</add> those same individual interests: on the one side due would be<lb/>a hearting on behalf of the party on that side: on the other side<lb/>no such hearing.  <del>If in</del> True it is that if <del><gap/></del> the demand<lb/>if unjust the <gap/> might not improbably be diluted by<lb/>the Judge, but as this is not accepted as a reason for refusing to<lb/>one party the benefit of a hearing in case in general so therefore<lb/>neither ought <add>should</add> it in this case in particular.</p> <p>In a case of this sort the proper and only proper question <add>authority</add><lb/>to apply to a Legislature.  By the Legislature if considered at all<lb/>the subject would be <add>naturally</add> considered in all its bearings and with relation<lb/>to all interests in any way concerned or about to be concerned. <del>To<lb/>apply to the Judge</del> An application to the Judge would be an application<lb/>to him to declare what is his offence <add>in relation to the <gap/> in question</add> is the meaning of the legislation<Lb/>was and is the will and meaning of the Legislature.  But<lb/><del>neither can it</del> in his situation the Judge it can not be <del><gap/></del><lb/>so surely know either or what is or what might be to be the will<lb/>and meaning of the Legislature <del>itself as</del> as to the Legislature<lb/>itself.</p> <p>In this case provision is accordingly made for maximizing<lb/>the faculty of obtaining in every such question <gap/> <add>from the proper quarter</add> of the<lb/>will and meaning of the Legislator.  But if exclusion be put upon<lb/>the practice of applying for a purpose of this sort to the Judge the usefulness<lb/>of it must depend upon the <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> which <del><gap/></del> such application informs<lb/>a <gap/> at the hands of the Legislature.  If though influence or<lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> an inconceivable preoccupation<lb/>the Legislature <del><gap/></del> <add>suffers</add> the<lb/>doubts or question <add>to be</add> unresolved,<lb/>better the <del><gap/></del>,<lb/><!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page --> duty had better be performed by the Judge than left <add>altogether</add> unperformed.  should the Legislature trust the <gap/> without examination to the <gap/> <del>it would</del> negligence and dereliction<lb/>of duty with which it would be <gap/> <del><gap/></del> as to these <gap/> and <gap/> points in question in the field of judicature is no other than these: that which is <del><gap/></del> <gap/><add>manifested</add><lb/>manifested in relation to the whole extent<lb/>of the field of law and judicature by the<lb/><del><gap/></del> authority allowed to the boundless<lb/>mass of Judge under <gap/> called Common Law.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:37, 20 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr. 26
Constitutional Code

1o 2o
Ch. Suits their sorts &c
§.6.|4 suits amicable and
§ Consultative

Reasons contra danger of collection for
obtaining a precedent. Quere

Art. A conceivable suit of this kind is that a
suit having for its object the ascertaining what would
antecedently to judicial demand grounded in a certain
portion of the law which in the event of a suit grounded on
it would be the interpretation put upon it by the Judge.

The To give allowance to a suit of the kind conceivable yet
preponderantly useful ad thence desirable use. On one side
here would be individual interest: on the other side, how
immediate so ever the pr decidedly so ever preponderant the damage to others individual
interest from the interpretation prayed as opportunity for
support/adequate to those same individual interests: on the one side due would be
a hearting on behalf of the party on that side: on the other side
no such hearing. If in True it is that if the demand
if unjust the might not improbably be diluted by
the Judge, but as this is not accepted as a reason for refusing to
one party the benefit of a hearing in case in general so therefore
neither ought should it in this case in particular.

In a case of this sort the proper and only proper question authority
to apply to a Legislature. By the Legislature if considered at all
the subject would be naturally considered in all its bearings and with relation
to all interests in any way concerned or about to be concerned. To
apply to the Judge
An application to the Judge would be an application
to him to declare what is his offence in relation to the in question is the meaning of the legislation
was and is the will and meaning of the Legislature. But
neither can it in his situation the Judge it can not be
so surely know either or what is or what might be to be the will
and meaning of the Legislature itself as as to the Legislature
itself.

In this case provision is accordingly made for maximizing
the faculty of obtaining in every such question from the proper quarter of the
will and meaning of the Legislator. But if exclusion be put upon
the practice of applying for a purpose of this sort to the Judge the usefulness
of it must depend upon the which such application informs
a at the hands of the Legislature. If though influence or
an inconceivable preoccupation
the Legislature suffers the
doubts or question to be unresolved,
better the ,
duty had better be performed by the Judge than left altogether unperformed. should the Legislature trust the without examination to the it would negligence and dereliction
of duty with which it would be as to these and points in question in the field of judicature is no other than these: that which is manifested
manifested in relation to the whole extent
of the field of law and judicature by the
authority allowed to the boundless
mass of Judge under called Common Law.



Identifier: | JB/056/059/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-02-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

002

Titles

Instructive / Ch. / Initiatory hearing where conclusive

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D1 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18115

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in