JB/068/144/001

Click Here To Edit

Such would of course be the observation made on
the part of almost any opponents when on the occasion in question
it happens to him to hear.

But Still in the impartial and discerning eyes the de
never could the distinction between falshood for the and
falshood for the best of purposes,

1826. June 16
Penal Code I
Ch. IXI Instruments of delinquency.
§.

But supposing a general rule to the effect
prevalent think it would naturally be said by those who disapproved
of it – think what would be the consequence.
The purpose by which on the occasion in question whatever it
would might be, his own interest would be most effectually served,
this purpose would in the eyes of each man would by persons in general each man be regarded as
a good one: and thus it might be continued, there might
as well be no rule at all indemnatory of falshood as
real which nev the of which might then easily be
shaken up.

Identifier: | JB/068/144/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68.
Date_1	1826-06-16	Marginal Summary Numbering	7-8
Box	068	Main Headings	penal code
Folio number	144	Info in main headings field	penal code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	22339
Box Contents