JB/118/235/002

Click Here To Edit

20 Jany 1812
Panopticon – Holfords Report

1
1. No notice taken of
the difference in point
of expence.

2
2. That plan which is
beyond comparison
most expensive is
reported as being to
be absolutely adopted
to the less expensive
on the benefit of a
trial is refused.

3
Newspapers
slightingly by Holford as the only
trusted to by
J.B. But all the
others that can apply
to the made, are
equally applicable
to J.B.'s besides
those that are peculiar
to his.

4.
Absolute rejection of
J.B.'s plan contended
for, Those because
there are afraid of the
competition. Bell
and Lancaster – J.B. wishes
for nothing so much.

To give room for the
theory fallacy,
J.B.'s play kept from
being brought into .

7
For the purpose of
the House to the
breach of faith, liberality
of the intended compensation
will be .
But if the expence of it
be insisted upon, as
being a needless expence then
for the purpose of it will be reduced.

---page break---

8
Holford's two Oracles
Paul & Becher – If these
authority were not relied
upon he use the expence any
manifested by them:
that their authority is his
sole reliance.

9.
They were confidentially
, there
was examination a charge
J.B.'s preference a cross-examination.

10
Paul could not brook that
his umpire should be
upon. He knows
little of human nature
of who thinks that of the
everything that can be
done by him of using
there is anything that
can not be done by love
of power.

11
J.B. wishes for nothing
but competition. Nothing
will satisfy Paul or
Becher but exclusive
preference – Monopoly

12
In J.B.'s estimate of
the public will
by the competition, i.e.
in the expence of Pauls
& Becher's part of it –
he J.B. has everything
to gain by it.

13
In case of J.B.'s
plan having a trial
no possibility of want
of Inspectors, while Paul
and Becher live

---page break---

14
Topics

1. Finance 1797-8
favourable.

2. Competition – nothing
would please J.B. better.
Exclusive possession is the
aim of the other side.

3. It was for fun of
the comparison that
J.B.'s plan was kept
back by the D. of Portland
in cooperation with
Paul &c.

4. On the quantity of
land as yet unpurchased much reliance
as an objection. J.B.
would give up his claim
to it.

5. Nothing a stronger condemnation
on Pitt
&c personal for
9 years
the number doubled

6. Objection – In the
open Panopticon mode
nobody will care about
it so as to afford inspection.
Answer – Paul
and Becher will at any rate

By J.B. Expence
reduced
from £24 to
£12 a head

---page break---

Debates 18 Jany 1812
or thereabouts.
makes a meal of getting
the honest poor to feed
on fish and potatoes
without bread. In Panopt.
Contract J.B. was forced
to engage to give bread and
meat: and Paul p.47
makes a and a meal
of the that convicts
will be fed with "the best
bread" the best meat –
the best of everything else
that is to be had in the
market.

☞ What J.B. contends
for is – not to be absolutely proscribed.
He will divide the
land – give half to
Paul & Becher.
They will inspect
therein: and let them
be inspections.
But inspectors this.

Propose that the
measure be not concluded
upon till
the comparative expence
of the building be
ascertained: viz. not
by estimate, but
by actual contract.

Paul and Becher
propose not any Subsidiary
Establishment.
J.B. it is objected
proposed only his own.
But per objective that
will be too great,
viz. by the amount of
his gain.

Put it to them
they have read J.B.'s
as well as Paul's and
Bechers evidence?

Identifier: | JB/118/235/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.
Date_1	1812-01-20	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-14
Box	118	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	235	Info in main headings field	panopticon halford's report
Image	002	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals		Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	39289
Box Contents