JB/056/077/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/077/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1825. May 5<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Formularies</note><lb/>(5 <note> &sect;. Judge to Defendant<lb/>Compliance or defence<lb/>requiring Mandate</note></p> <!-- start of crossed out section --> <p>Warnings for the better securing of correctness and<lb/><sic>compleatness</sic> in <add>judicial assertions and</add> testimony to be <del>added</del> added <del>to</del></p> <p>Mandates <del>to</del> <add>in</add> which these warnings are to be <del>added</del. <add>inserted</add><lb/>are</p> <p><del>1. Judge to defendant Defence order compliance</del><lb/>1. Compliance or Defence-requiring Mandate<lb/>2. Defendant's testimony-requiring mandate<lb/>3. Pursuers or <sic>Copursuers</sic> testimony requiring mandate<lb/>4. Witnesses testimony-<del>rquiry</del> requiring mandate.</p> <!-- end of crossed out section --> <p><add>XV. <del>Responsibility</del> Veracity securing warning.</add></p> <p>17. For the truth of every assertion <add>of yours</add> contained in any of the<lb/>above papers you will be <add>spared</add> responsibility <sic>compensationally</sic> or<lb/><sic>punishionably</sic> or both as the case may be in the same<lb/>manner as if it had been expressed by word of mouth<lb/>in the Justice Chamber.</p> <p><add>XVI. >de;/E</del> <add>Eventual</add> Re-examinability warning.</add></p> <p>respecting any assertion so contained you remain liable<lb/>to be at any time examined <add>under the same responsibility</add> by word of mouth at the Justice<lb/>Chamber or any such other place as <del>the Ju</del> shall have been appointed.<lb/>It is for your accommodation <del>only</del> that the liberty<lb/>of answering without charge in your intended place of <del><gap/></del><lb/>abode is allowed.</p>
<head>1825. May 5<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Formularies</note><lb/>(5 <note> &sect;. Judge to Defendant<lb/>Compliance or Defence<lb/>requiring Mandate</note></p> <!-- start of crossed out section --> <p>Warnings for the better securing of correctness and<lb/><sic>compleatness</sic> in <add>judicial assertions and</add> testimony to be <del>added</del> added <del>to</del></p> <p>Mandates <del>by</del> <add>in</add> which these warnings are to be <del>added</del> <add>inserted</add><lb/>are</p> <p><del>1. Judge to Defendant Defence order compliance</del><lb/>1. Compliance or Defence-requiring Mandate<lb/>2. Defendant's testimony-requiring mandate<lb/>3. Pursuers or <sic>Copursuers</sic> testimony-requiring mandate<lb/>4. Witnesses testimony-<del>rquiry</del> requiring mandate.</p> <!-- end of crossed out section --> <p><add>XV. <del>Responsibility</del> Veracity securing warning.</add></p> <p>17. For the truth of every assertion <add>of yours</add> contained in any of the<lb/>above papers you will be <add>spared</add> responsibility <sic>compensationally</sic> or<lb/><sic>punishionably</sic> or both as the case may be in the same<lb/>manner as if it had been expressed by word of mouth<lb/>in the Justice Chamber.</p> <p><add>XVI. <del>E</del> Eventual Re-examinability warning.</add></p> <p>Respecting any assertion so contained you remain liable<lb/>to be at any time examined <add>under the same responsibility</add> by word of mouth at the Justice<lb/>Chamber or any such other place as <del>the Ju</del> shall have been appointed.<lb/>It is for your accommodation <del>only</del> that the liberty<lb/>of answering without charge in your intended place of <del>abb</del><lb/>abode is allowed.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:21, 4 February 2025

Click Here To Edit

1825. May 5
Procedure Code

Ch. Formularies
(5 §. Judge to Defendant
Compliance or Defence
requiring Mandate

Warnings for the better securing of correctness and
compleatness in judicial assertions and testimony to be added added to

Mandates by in which these warnings are to be added inserted
are

1. Judge to Defendant Defence order compliance
1. Compliance or Defence-requiring Mandate
2. Defendant's testimony-requiring mandate
3. Pursuers or Copursuers testimony-requiring mandate
4. Witnesses testimony-rquiry requiring mandate.

XV. Responsibility Veracity securing warning.

17. For the truth of every assertion of yours contained in any of the
above papers you will be spared responsibility compensationally or
punishionably or both as the case may be in the same
manner as if it had been expressed by word of mouth
in the Justice Chamber.

XVI. E Eventual Re-examinability warning.

Respecting any assertion so contained you remain liable
to be at any time examined under the same responsibility by word of mouth at the Justice
Chamber or any such other place as the Ju shall have been appointed.
It is for your accommodation only that the liberty
of answering without charge in your intended place of abb
abode is allowed.



Identifier: | JB/056/077/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-05-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

077

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18133

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in