JB/056/093/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/093/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1825. May 12<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> VIII<lb/>&sect;. </note></p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>(9) (8)</p> <!-- paragraphs headings in pencil, numbering does not match the marginal summary numbering --> <p><note>29<lb/>II Wrong is<lb/>1 by positive act<lb/>2 by negative</note></p> <p>28. II Wrong is 1. by positive act. 2. by negative</p> <p>Wrong <gap/> integral in a positive act, effective service <hi rend="underline"><gap/> <gap/></hi><lb/>judicial, the inhibitive</p> <p><note>30<lb/>Wrong by positive act<lb/>modes of obviation 1<lb/>preventative 2 reparative<lb/>3 recurrence preventive</note></p> <p>29. Wrong by positive act<lb/>Wrong modes of <gap/> &#x2014; 1. prevention. 2. reparation. 3. recurrence</p> <p><del>Wrong is <gap/></del> Well now a less effect wrong is capable of being obviated in any one of three ways viz. 1. the<lb/><add><gap/></add> preventive. 2. the curative <add>or reparative</add>: 3. the recurrence preventive.</p> <p><note>31<lb/>Mode preventive effective<lb/>service abstentive<lb/>judiciary inhibition<lb/>prohibition</note></p> <p>30. 1 Mode preventative, effective service <sic>abstentive;</sic> judiciary, inhibitive, prohibitive</p> <p>When as yet it is but in future contingency and a suit<lb/>in contemplation it <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> or to no considerable<lb/>extent be prevented from coming into existence.  So far as this<lb/>is the case the effective service demanded may termed the <gap/>:<lb/>the judicial service the <gap/></p> <p><note>32<lb/>To the extent of satisfaction<lb/>administering<lb/>reparation is effective<lb/>effective service is<lb/>satisfaction</note></p> <p>31. To the extent of satisfaction administrative operation is effected <add>effective</add> service<lb/>satisfactive.</p> <p><del>Wrong</del> When <add>actually and already</add> committed wrong will in some instances<lb/>and to a certain extent <sic>admitt</sic>of reparation.  so far as this<lb>is the case the effective service may be stated the reparative, or the satisfactive.</p> <p><note>33<lb/>Of the judicial service<lb/>the effect is retroactive</note></p> <p>32. Of the judicial service the effect is retroactive</p> <p>Thus far the good effect is retroactive<lb/>and applies to the past.</p> <p><note>34<lb/>In consideration of the<lb/>past evil it can confer<lb/>at the <sic>expence</sic> of the<lb/>author good in a<lb/>quantity less, equal<lb/>or greater</note></p> <p>33> In consideration of the past evil it can<lb/>confer at the <sic>expence</sic> of the author good<lb/>in a quantity less, equal or greater</p> <p>what has happened the pain created<lb/>or imaginable <gap/> can not to have happened.  <gap/> in the<lb/>reduction of the evil that has happened it can acuase good<lb/>in a quantity more or less approaching to equality, <del><gap/.</del> <add>and<lb/>under favourable <gap/>, say<lb?>to excess and <gap/>, to be produced and received <add>enjoyed</add>.</p> <p><note>35<lb/>Security without<lb/>producing evil can<lb/>not reparation<lb/>be effected.</note></p> <p>34. Security <del>otherwise than</del> without producing evil can not reparation be effected.</p> <p>But however wrong mya be <gap/> seldom otherwisde than<lb?>by the production and <gap/> of evil and thaT <GAP/>,lB/. IN PREPONDERANT QUALIOTY CAN GOOD IN THIS WAY BE PRODUCED.</P>
<head>1825. May 12<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> VIII<lb/>&sect;. </note></p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>(9) (8)</p> <!-- paragraphs headings in pencil, numbering does not match the marginal summary numbering --> <p><note>29<lb/>II Wrong is<lb/>1 by positive act<lb/>2 by negative</note></p> <p>28. II Wrong is 1. by positive act. 2. by negative</p> <p>Wrong <gap/> integral and a positive act, effective service <hi rend="underline">the <sic>abstentive</sic></hi><lb/>judicial, the inhibitive</p> <p><note>30<lb/>Wrong by positive act<lb/>modes of obviation 1<lb/>preventative 2 reparative<lb/>3 recurrence preventive</note></p> <p><add>29.</add> Wrong by positive act<lb/>Wrong &#x2014; modes of obviation &#x2014; 1. preventive. 2. reparative. 3. recurrence-preventive</p> <p><del>Wrong is <gap/></del> Well now a less effect wrong is capable<lb/>of being obviated in any one of three ways viz. 1. the<lb/><add><unclear>impunity</unclear></add> preventive. 2. the curative <add>or reparative</add>: 3. the recurrence preventive.</p> <p><note>31<lb/>Mode preventive effective<lb/>service <sic>abstentive</sic><lb/>judiciary inhibition<lb/>prohibitive</note></p> <p>30. 1 Mode preventative, effective service <sic>abstentive;</sic> judiciary, inhibitive, prohibitive</p> <p>When as yet it is but in future contingency and is just<lb/>in contemplation it <unclear>may be being carry on</unclear> to no inconsiderable<lb/>extent be prevented from coming into existence.  So far as this<lb/>is the case the effective service demanded may be termed the <sic>abstentive</sic>:<lb/>the judicial service the inhibitive</p> <p><note>32<lb/>To the extent of satisfaction<lb/>administering<lb/>reparation is effected<lb/>effective service is<lb/><sic>satisfactive</sic></note></p> <p>31. To the extent of satisfaction administrative operation is effected <add>effective</add> service<lb/><sic><hi rend="underline">satisfactive</hi></sic>.</p> <p><del>Wrong</del> When <add>actually and already</add> committed wrong will in some instances<lb/>and to a certain extent <sic>admitt</sic> of reparation.  So far as this<lb/>is the case the effective service may be stated the reparative,<lb/>or the <sic>satisfactive</sic>.</p> <p><note>33<lb/>Of the judicial service<lb/>the effect is retroactive</note></p> <p>32. Of the judicial service, the effect is retroactive</p> <p>Thus far the good effect is retroactive<lb/>and applies to the past.</p> <p><note>34<lb/>In consideration of the<lb/>past evil it can confer<lb/>at the <sic>expence</sic> of the<lb/>author good in a<lb/>quantity less, equal<lb/>or greater</note></p> <p>33. In consideration of the past evil it can<lb/>confer at the <sic>expence</sic> of the author, good<lb/>in a quantity less, equal or greater</p> <p>What has happened the pain <unclear>intended</unclear><lb/>or imaginable can cause evil to have happened.  But in the<lb/>reduction of the evil that has happened it can cause good<lb/>in a quantity more or less approaching to equality, <del><gap/></del> <add>and<lb/>under favourable circumstances, may</add><lb/>to excess and superabundance, to be produced and received <add>enjoyed</add>.</p> <p><note>35<lb/>Security without<lb/>producing evil can<lb/>such reparation<lb/>be effected.</note></p> <p>34. Security <del>otherwise than</del> without producing evil can such reparation be effected.</p> <p>But however wrong may be <unclear>required</unclear> seldom otherwise than<lb/>by the production and <gap/> of evil &#x2014; and that <gap/><lb/>in preponderant quality can good in this way be produced.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:51, 17 February 2025

Click Here To Edit

1825. May 12
Procedure Code

Ch. VIII
§.

(9) (8)

29
II Wrong is
1 by positive act
2 by negative

28. II Wrong is 1. by positive act. 2. by negative

Wrong integral and a positive act, effective service the abstentive
judicial, the inhibitive

30
Wrong by positive act
modes of obviation 1
preventative 2 reparative
3 recurrence preventive

29. Wrong by positive act
Wrong — modes of obviation — 1. preventive. 2. reparative. 3. recurrence-preventive

Wrong is Well now a less effect wrong is capable
of being obviated in any one of three ways viz. 1. the
impunity preventive. 2. the curative or reparative: 3. the recurrence preventive.

31
Mode preventive effective
service abstentive
judiciary inhibition
prohibitive

30. 1 Mode preventative, effective service abstentive; judiciary, inhibitive, prohibitive

When as yet it is but in future contingency and is just
in contemplation it may be being carry on to no inconsiderable
extent be prevented from coming into existence. So far as this
is the case the effective service demanded may be termed the abstentive:
the judicial service the inhibitive

32
To the extent of satisfaction
administering
reparation is effected
effective service is
satisfactive

31. To the extent of satisfaction administrative operation is effected effective service
satisfactive.

Wrong When actually and already committed wrong will in some instances
and to a certain extent admitt of reparation. So far as this
is the case the effective service may be stated the reparative,
or the satisfactive.

33
Of the judicial service
the effect is retroactive

32. Of the judicial service, the effect is retroactive

Thus far the good effect is retroactive
and applies to the past.

34
In consideration of the
past evil it can confer
at the expence of the
author good in a
quantity less, equal
or greater

33. In consideration of the past evil it can
confer at the expence of the author, good
in a quantity less, equal or greater

What has happened the pain intended
or imaginable can cause evil to have happened. But in the
reduction of the evil that has happened it can cause good
in a quantity more or less approaching to equality, and
under favourable circumstances, may

to excess and superabundance, to be produced and received enjoyed.

35
Security without
producing evil can
such reparation
be effected.

34. Security otherwise than without producing evil can such reparation be effected.

But however wrong may be required seldom otherwise than
by the production and of evil — and that
in preponderant quality can good in this way be produced.



Identifier: | JB/056/093/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-05-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

29-35

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

093

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C9 / C8

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18149

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in