JB/056/121/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/121/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827. <sic>Sept<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 17<lb/><add>Procedure</add> <del>Constitutional</del> Code</head> <p><note><del><sic>Ch.</sic> X <gap/></del> <add>Prefat</add><lb/>&sect;.</note></p> <p>Between Technical and Natural Procedure, the<lb/>characteristic difference may be expressed in a few words.</p> <p>Of technical procedure the <add>prime</add> object is &#x2014; to do every thing as<lb/>near as possible to what <add>whatever</add> has been done before. <add>beyond this the design of it does not extend of making more eligible <gap/><lb/>this is so much on a<lb/><gap/> endeavoured to<lb/> be <gap/></add>  Of Natural<lb/>Procedure the object is to give execution and effect <add>principal <gap/> as</add> to the substantive<lb/>branch of the law, with as little delay, vexation and<lb/><sic>expence</sic> as possible.</p> <p>The technical branch of procedure is <add>in effect</add> a branch<lb/>from the Judge-made species &#x2014; the so called Common Law.<lb/>The Common Law in its totality has for its object as above<lb/> the day every thing as near as possible to whatever has been done<lb/>before.  As to the effect upon human happiness, <add>upon any such matter</add> scarce a<lb/><add>much as a single</add> thought is here expended by <add>upon</add> it.  In the chief tribune of the<lb/>Common Law the post of Lord Chief Justice <gap/> first Valuer of<lb/>Institutes, if under the name of the augmentive at <gap/><lb/>a <add>sort of</add> feint allowance is made to it, the state instead of being the<lb/>first is <del>neither a <gap/> of argument</del> <add>in a</add> <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/><lb/>of Common Law argument, as neither the first nor yet the last<lb/>but confounded with the <gap/></p> <p>A competitor of opposite <gap/> is a defaulter which<lb/>is a denomination, which by one writer <add>an <gap/> <gap/> later</note><lb/>has been employed in <note>&amp; <gap/> in law</note><lb/>the character of a definition of the same Common Law.  Nor yet<lb/>by any means with impropriety.  Nor is the account of the<lb/>creator <gap/> <add>in</add> instructive or improper, as far as it goes. With<lb/>the account <gap/> just given it <gap/> not inexactly<lb/><add><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> it is &#x2014; that</add> <gap/> gives as <gap/> whether <sic>stiled</sic> rule or <gap/> or<lb/>what else so ever of Common Law are deduced by analysis<lb/>then if taken from those of previous <gap/> and so on without end,<lb/>except in so far as <gap/> of the matter of Statute law comes in<lb/><add>as it were</add> and overlaps <add>overlays</add></p>
<head>1827. <sic>Sept<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 17<lb/><add>Procedure</add> <del>Constitutional</del> Code</head> <p><note><del><sic>Ch.</sic> X <gap/></del> <add>Prefat</add><lb/>&sect;.</note></p> <p>Between Technical and Natural Procedure, the<lb/>characteristic difference may be expressed in a few words.</p> <p>Of technical procedure the <add>prime</add> object is &#x2014; to do every thing as<lb/>near as possible to what <add>whatever</add> has been done before. <add>beyond this the design of it does not extend of making more eligible <gap/><lb/>this is so much on a<lb/><gap/> endeavoured to<lb/> be <unclear>restrained</unclear></add>  Of Natural<lb/>Procedure the object is to give execution and effect <add>principal <gap/> as</add> to the substantive<lb/>branch of the law, with as little delay, vexation and<lb/><sic>expence</sic> as possible.</p> <p>The technical branch of procedure is <add>in effect</add> a branch<lb/>from the Judge-made species &#x2014; the so called Common Law.<lb/>The Common Law in its totality has for its object as above<lb/> the day every thing as near as possible to whatever has been done<lb/>before.  As to the effect upon human happiness, <add>upon any such matter</add> scarce a<lb/><add>much as a single</add> thought is here expended by <add>upon</add> it.  In the chief tribune of the<lb/>Common Law &#x2014; the first of Lord Chief Justice <unclear>Coles</unclear> first Valuer of<lb/>Institutes, if under the name of the argument at <unclear>inconceivable</unclear><lb/>a <add>sort of</add> feint allowance is made to it, this state instead of being the<lb/>first is <del>neither a bundle of argument</del> <add><del>in</del> a</add> bundle composed of <gap/><lb/>of Common Law argument, as neither the first nor yet the last<lb/>but confounded with the <unclear>crowd</unclear></p> <p>A <unclear>competitor</unclear> of opposite analysis is a defaulter which<lb/>is a denomination, which by one writer <add>an <gap/> <unclear>Authority</unclear> later</add><lb/>has been employed in <note>&amp; duty in law</note><lb/>the character of a definition of the same Common Law.  Nor yet<lb/>by any means with impropriety.  Nor is the account of the<lb/>creator either <add>an</add> instructor or improper, as far as it goes. With<lb/>the account hereabove just given it <gap/> not inexactly<lb/><add><gap/> and <gap/> it is &#x2014; that</add> <gap/> gives as positive whether <sic>stiled</sic> rules or <gap/> or<lb/>what else so ever of Common Law are deduced by analysis<lb/>than if taken from those of previous <unclear>dicts</unclear> and so on without end,<lb/>except in so far as <gap/> of the matter of Statute law comes in<lb/><add>as it were</add> and overlaps <add>overlays</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:20, 10 March 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Septr. 17
Procedure Constitutional Code

Ch. X Prefat
§.

Between Technical and Natural Procedure, the
characteristic difference may be expressed in a few words.

Of technical procedure the prime object is — to do every thing as
near as possible to what whatever has been done before. beyond this the design of it does not extend of making more eligible
this is so much on a
endeavoured to
be restrained
Of Natural
Procedure the object is to give execution and effect principal as to the substantive
branch of the law, with as little delay, vexation and
expence as possible.

The technical branch of procedure is in effect a branch
from the Judge-made species — the so called Common Law.
The Common Law in its totality has for its object as above
the day every thing as near as possible to whatever has been done
before. As to the effect upon human happiness, upon any such matter scarce a
much as a single thought is here expended by upon it. In the chief tribune of the
Common Law — the first of Lord Chief Justice Coles first Valuer of
Institutes, if under the name of the argument at inconceivable
a sort of feint allowance is made to it, this state instead of being the
first is neither a bundle of argument in a bundle composed of
of Common Law argument, as neither the first nor yet the last
but confounded with the crowd

A competitor of opposite analysis is a defaulter which
is a denomination, which by one writer an Authority later
has been employed in & duty in law
the character of a definition of the same Common Law. Nor yet
by any means with impropriety. Nor is the account of the
creator either an instructor or improper, as far as it goes. With
the account hereabove just given it not inexactly
and it is — that gives as positive whether stiled rules or or
what else so ever of Common Law are deduced by analysis
than if taken from those of previous dicts and so on without end,
except in so far as of the matter of Statute law comes in
as it were and overlaps overlays



Identifier: | JB/056/121/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-09-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

121

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18177

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in