★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1827. March 15<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> All comprehensive<lb/>arrangements<lb/>§.7 <del>Applic</del> Instruments</note></p> <p>§.<hi rend="underline">7 Instruments</hi> <!-- addition in pencil --> <add>(Judicial)</add><p><note>1<lb/><add>Judicial</add> Instrument a portion<lb/>of discourse issued by a<lb/>actor on the judicial<lb/>theatre</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> 1. I. Instruments — Judicial instruments. By an instrument understand on<lb/>this occasion in every case a portion of discourse.<lb/>Of discourse? Good. | <head>1827. March 15.<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> All comprehensive<lb/>arrangements<lb/>§.7 <del>Applic</del> Instruments</note></p> <p>§.<hi rend="underline">7 Instruments</hi> <!-- addition in pencil --> <add>(Judicial)</add></p> <p><note>1<lb/><add>Judicial</add> Instrument a portion<lb/>of discourse issued by a<lb/>actor on the judicial<lb/>theatre</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> 1. I. Instruments — Judicial instruments.<lb/>By an instrument understand on<lb/>this occasion in every case a portion of discourse.<lb/>Of discourse? Good. But whose discourse? discourse<lb/>of whom? Answer. It may be, in each instance, of<lb/>any one of the parties who in §. have been designated<lb/>as actors, whether constantly or occasionally<lb/>engaged in bearing a part in the Judicial<lb/>Drama <add>Theatre</add></p> <p><note>2<lb/>Instruments <sic>antecedential</sic><lb/>& consequential</note></p> <p>II. Now then take any one of these characters,<lb/>and apply to it the distinction expressed by the<lb/>words <sic>antecedential</sic> and consequential. The discourse<lb/>to which, on the occasion in question he<lb/>gives utterance will either have originated with<lb/>himself or not. In the first case, it may be <sic>stiled<lb/>antecedential.</sic> In the other case, consequential.</p> <p><del>By</del> <sic>Antecedential</sic>, call it when it is <add>he</add> in him<lb/>whose discourse it is that <add>is the person in whom</add> it originates. Consequential,<lb/>when it is called forth and produced by some<lb/>potion of discourse,<!-- brackets in pencil --> [or by some act] uttered by or<lb/>on the part of some other person in that same<lb/>list.</p> <p>Consequential instrument. Of a consequential<lb/>instrument, the character will depend upon<lb/>the relation that has place between the person addressing<lb/>and the person addressed.</p> <p>☞ Turn now to the several <hi rend="underline">actors</hi> considered<lb/>in the several characters of addressers<lb/>and addressees, and exhibit the correspondent characters<lb/>of the several correspondent instruments.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1827. March 15.
Procedure Code
Ch. All comprehensive
arrangements
§.7 Applic Instruments
§.7 Instruments (Judicial)
1
Judicial Instrument a portion
of discourse issued by a
actor on the judicial
theatre
Art. 1. I. Instruments — Judicial instruments.
By an instrument understand on
this occasion in every case a portion of discourse.
Of discourse? Good. But whose discourse? discourse
of whom? Answer. It may be, in each instance, of
any one of the parties who in §. have been designated
as actors, whether constantly or occasionally
engaged in bearing a part in the Judicial
Drama Theatre
2
Instruments antecedential
& consequential
II. Now then take any one of these characters,
and apply to it the distinction expressed by the
words antecedential and consequential. The discourse
to which, on the occasion in question he
gives utterance will either have originated with
himself or not. In the first case, it may be stiled
antecedential. In the other case, consequential.
By Antecedential, call it when it is he in him
whose discourse it is that is the person in whom it originates. Consequential,
when it is called forth and produced by some
potion of discourse, [or by some act] uttered by or
on the part of some other person in that same
list.
Consequential instrument. Of a consequential
instrument, the character will depend upon
the relation that has place between the person addressing
and the person addressed.
☞ Turn now to the several actors considered
in the several characters of addressers
and addressees, and exhibit the correspondent characters
of the several correspondent instruments.
|
Identifier: | JB/056/123/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1827-03-15 |
1-2 |
||
|
056 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
123 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
C1 / E1 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1826 |
|||
|
18179 |
|||
