★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1828. <del>March</del> <add>July 7</add><lb/>Law Amendment <add>or Procedure Code</add></head> <p><note><del>Propositions</del> <add><sic>Ch.</sic> 1. All comprehensive</add></note><lb/>(1 <note>§.1. Subject matters<lb/>§§. Existing system</note></p> <p>§§. The existing System — its habitudes in relation to the above<lb/>subject matters.</p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> If under every system of legislation — and<lb/>thence in every system of Procedure — these several subject-matters<lb/>require to have place, or will be found to have place<lb/>or to require to have place, and if at the same time under<lb/>the here proposed system their respective natures, and what is<lb/>proposed to be done in relation to them respectively is brought <add>held up</add><lb/>to view and rendered easily intelligible, the <del><gap/></del> aggregate<lb/>here above brought to view will constitute a standard by <add>with</add><lb/>reference to which whatsoever corresponding portion of matter<lb/>has place in any established or other proposed system may<lb/>be confronted for the <add>several</add> purposes of explanation or say explanations<lb/>and trial: explanation for the purpose of <sic>shewing</sic> what it is;<lb/>trial, for the purpose of <sic>shewing</sic> how far <hi rend="underline">that which is</hi> agrees<lb/>with that which, reference had to the all-comprehensive end —<lb/><hi rend="underline">ought to be</hi>.</p> <p>In <add>the</add> established system in general, but most of all in<lb/>the English established system, it will be seen how needful this<lb/>conformation <del><gap/></del> <add>or say juxtaposition</add> is <del>in the fir</del> were it only in the first place<lb/>for the purpose of explanation, the true nature of each subject-matter<lb/>being in English practice to such a degree disguised<lb/>and rendered <del><gap/></del> obscure by the appellatives in use.</p> <p>Take for example, the very first article in the list of<lb/><add>the sorts of</add> the <foreign>Dramatis Personæ</foreign> or say Actors in the Judicial theatre<lb/>to wit the Judges. When the time comes, it will be seen that<lb/>not <unclear>fewer those as</unclear> are the appellatives under which, as it were<lb/>in masquerade the character of the Judge is <del><gap/></del> massed up<lb/>and disguised in English practice. <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note>+ See below, <sic>Ch.</sic></note></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1828. March July 7
Law Amendment or Procedure Code
Propositions Ch. 1. All comprehensive
(1 §.1. Subject matters
§§. Existing system
§§. The existing System — its habitudes in relation to the above
subject matters.
Art. If under every system of legislation — and
thence in every system of Procedure — these several subject-matters
require to have place, or will be found to have place
or to require to have place, and if at the same time under
the here proposed system their respective natures, and what is
proposed to be done in relation to them respectively is brought held up
to view and rendered easily intelligible, the aggregate
here above brought to view will constitute a standard by with
reference to which whatsoever corresponding portion of matter
has place in any established or other proposed system may
be confronted for the several purposes of explanation or say explanations
and trial: explanation for the purpose of shewing what it is;
trial, for the purpose of shewing how far that which is agrees
with that which, reference had to the all-comprehensive end —
ought to be.
In the established system in general, but most of all in
the English established system, it will be seen how needful this
conformation or say juxtaposition is in the fir were it only in the first place
for the purpose of explanation, the true nature of each subject-matter
being in English practice to such a degree disguised
and rendered obscure by the appellatives in use.
Take for example, the very first article in the list of
the sorts of the Dramatis Personæ or say Actors in the Judicial theatre
to wit the Judges. When the time comes, it will be seen that
not fewer those as are the appellatives under which, as it were
in masquerade the character of the Judge is massed up
and disguised in English practice. + + See below, Ch.
|
Identifier: | JB/056/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-07-07 |
|||
|
056 |
|||
|
139 |
Law Amendments or Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
E1 |
||
|
18195 |
|||
