JB/056/183/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/183/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic><lb/><add>Law Amendment</add> <del>Constitutional</del> Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Propositions<lb/>&sect;. Procedure<lb/><add>Sole proper course<lb/>Present courses</add></note></p> <p><add><del>1. <gap/> 2. Indictment/2 Bills 3. Information 4. <foreign>ex officio</foreign></del></add></p> <!-- to the right of the last text --> <p><add><del>In complex cases this must be <gap/> <gap/><lb/>but the <hi rend="underline">mode</hi> is still the <gap/> same.</del></add></p> <p><note>Simplicity and fitness<lb/>of this mode of proceeding</note></p> <p>Of this mode of proceeding the simplicity is no less perfect than<lb/>its fitness its suitableness to the purpose, to every purpose of justice<lb/>to the character of the true state of the relative facts in each <add>individual</add> case, in so<lb/>far as the nature of the case admitted of its being elicited.</p> <p>In a word there is but one mode well adapted to the purpose<lb/>of coming at the truth of fact, and this <add>the above</add> is that mode.</p> <p>Observe now the vast virtue of the mode in present practice employed<lb/>under the nature of coming at the truth of facts: how much<lb/>more complicated than every one of them are, and by and <gap/> proportion<lb/>be that any complication  <del><sic>Misadapted</sic></del> <add><del>Better</del> <sic>Misadapted</sic></add> to the <sic>alledged</sic> purpose: adapted<lb/>to the suppression of correct <add>and thence of complete</add> and to the <del>the <gap/></del> production  <add>exhibition and <gap/></add> <del>consider</del><lb/>of <gap/> evidence</p> <p>&#9758; Go on to 1. Action 2. Bills <add>3. <gap/> in <unclear>Ecclesias<hi rend="superscript">l</hi></unclear></add> <!-- deletion in pencil --><del>3. Indictment 4. Information 5. <foreign>Ex Officio</foreign> <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic></del><lb/>Mention as omitted <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <foreign>Mandemus.</foreign> 2. <unclear>Quo</unclear> Warrants agree on the useless<lb/><gap/> inquiry on bad evidence</p> <p><note>Not only <add>to</add> simple suits<lb/><del>But the most comp</del> is this<lb/>applicable but to all as<lb/>the most complex are<lb/>resolvable into a number<lb/>of simple suits</note></p> <p>If this is the case in <del><gap/></del> suits <add>cases</add> of the utmost degree of simplicity,<lb/>not less it is so in <del><gap/></del> suits <add>cases</add> of the utmost degree of complexity<lb/>no <del><gap/></del> suit but is resolvable into a number less <unclear>imperative</unclear> of simple<lb/>suits, each of them capable of being begun continued and ended in the<lb/>same mode as above, the number of suits less or greater but the mode<lb/>of producing exactly <add>throughout</add> the same</p> <p><note>Be the number of these<lb/>elementary suits <add>ever so great</add> they<lb/>may all; be begun <del>continued<lb/>&amp; terminated together</del> at<lb/>the same time the time<lb/>of termination of each<lb/>only depending on the<lb/>facility or difficulty as<lb/>to the evidence</note></p> <p>As to delay be the number of those elementary suits ever<lb/>so great there is no reason why <del><gap/></del> in its commencement <add>beginning</add> continuance<lb/>or for its termination it should wait for any other: why they should<lb/>not be every one of them be begun <del>and</del> at the same time each of<lb/>them <del>being</del> receiving therefore <del>such</del> continuance and termination at such<lb/>times as <del>the facility</del> should be the result of the facility or difficulty as to<lb/>the obtainment of the evidence.</p> <p><del>Cases which present the highest degree of complexity are those which<lb/><gap/> are</del></p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:49, 1 May 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Octr.
Law Amendment Constitutional Code

Ch. Propositions
§. Procedure
Sole proper course
Present courses

1. 2. Indictment/2 Bills 3. Information 4. ex officio

In complex cases this must be
but the mode is still the same.

Simplicity and fitness
of this mode of proceeding

Of this mode of proceeding the simplicity is no less perfect than
its fitness its suitableness to the purpose, to every purpose of justice
to the character of the true state of the relative facts in each individual case, in so
far as the nature of the case admitted of its being elicited.

In a word there is but one mode well adapted to the purpose
of coming at the truth of fact, and this the above is that mode.

Observe now the vast virtue of the mode in present practice employed
under the nature of coming at the truth of facts: how much
more complicated than every one of them are, and by and proportion
be that any complication Misadapted Better Misadapted to the alledged purpose: adapted
to the suppression of correct and thence of complete and to the the production exhibition and consider
of evidence

☞ Go on to 1. Action 2. Bills 3. in Ecclesiasl 3. Indictment 4. Information 5. Ex Officio do
Mention as omitted Mandemus. 2. Quo Warrants agree on the useless
inquiry on bad evidence

Not only to simple suits
But the most comp is this
applicable but to all as
the most complex are
resolvable into a number
of simple suits

If this is the case in suits cases of the utmost degree of simplicity,
not less it is so in suits cases of the utmost degree of complexity
no suit but is resolvable into a number less imperative of simple
suits, each of them capable of being begun continued and ended in the
same mode as above, the number of suits less or greater but the mode
of producing exactly throughout the same

Be the number of these
elementary suits ever so great they
may all; be begun continued
& terminated together
at
the same time the time
of termination of each
only depending on the
facility or difficulty as
to the evidence

As to delay be the number of those elementary suits ever
so great there is no reason why in its commencement beginning continuance
or for its termination it should wait for any other: why they should
not be every one of them be begun and at the same time each of
them being receiving therefore such continuance and termination at such
times as the facility should be the result of the facility or difficulty as to
the obtainment of the evidence.

Cases which present the highest degree of complexity are those which
are



Identifier: | JB/056/183/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

183

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C3 / E3

Penner

Watermarks

BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Edmund Henry Barker

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

18239

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in