★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 20 +<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>Propositions<lb/><add>§ Procedure<lb/><sic>Fixt</sic> days none.</note></p> <p><note>or 1<lb/>No general fixation of<lb/>times for judicial operations —<lb/>Delay vexation<lb/>& <sic>expence</sic> the result of<lb/>fixation</note></p> <p><add>To</add | <head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 20 +<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>Propositions<lb/><add>§ Procedure<lb/><sic>Fixt</sic> days none.</add></note></p> <p><note>or 1<lb/>No general fixation of<lb/>times for judicial operations —<lb/>Delay vexation<lb/>& <sic>expence</sic> the result of<lb/>fixation</note></p> <p><add>To</add> For no judicial operation whatsoever <!-- brackets in pencil --> [by whatsoever preferable]<lb/>should any be <sic>fixt</sic> by any general ordinance. Delay, vexation<lb/>and <sic>expence</sic> all follows — all the <unclear>waste</unclear> of such fixation are the<lb/>sure result. In the procedure in and by <unclear>Justice</unclear> only out of<lb/><add><gap/></add> system no such fixation has place. Why? because in that case<lb/>except by means of individual will no <unclear>schedule of entrants</unclear> in judicature<lb/>has place.</p> <p><note>or 2<lb/>Under existing system<lb/>this fixation has place<lb/>not only in fact but<lb/>of necessity — necessary<lb/>from the habit of<lb/>bandying suits from<lb/>place to place</note></p> <p>For it is that under the whole of the technical part of it the existing<lb/>system such fixation has place not only in fact but of necessity.<lb/>Why? because not only has <add>does</add> such <unclear>schedule of continuity</unclear><lb/>with wide gaps for the results abound but <gap/> be so <unclear>inlapping</unclear><lb/>in extent suits with parties and proceedings are in the case<lb/>and for the purpose of the same suit, <hi rend="underline">banded</hi> as above <add>and made to vibrate</add> between<lb/><gap/> place and place.</p> <p><del>☞ Give here the reason why fixture is <hi rend="underline">worse</hi> than useless</del></p> <p><note>or 3.<lb/>Only in one out of an<lb/>indefinite number of<lb/>cases can the interval<lb/><sic>fixt</sic> be adapted to the<lb/>purpose.</note></p> <p><add>In such <gap/> suit</add> Only in <add>some</add> one out of an <del><gap/></del> variable and sometimes <add>large and</add> indefinite<lb/>number of instances can the interval <sic>fixt</sic> connect <add>be in connection</add> with<lb/>the interval <del>best and</del> most exactly adapted to the purpose. This<lb/>exception excepted the interval so <sic>fixt</sic> is either too long or too short.<lb/>If too long, the proportion to the excess in length is the feckless<lb/>— the worse than useless delay thus engendered. If too short, then<lb/><del><gap/></del> from one person to another come applications for the enlarging<lb/>it. Here then comes a suit within a suit, a first question <gap/><lb/>in addition to the original one.</p> <p>Note. The greater part of the book of practice is occupied<lb/>about the fixation of these days</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1827. Octr. 20 +
Law Amendment
2o
Propositions
§ Procedure
Fixt days none.
or 1
No general fixation of
times for judicial operations —
Delay vexation
& expence the result of
fixation
To For no judicial operation whatsoever [by whatsoever preferable]
should any be fixt by any general ordinance. Delay, vexation
and expence all follows — all the waste of such fixation are the
sure result. In the procedure in and by Justice only out of
system no such fixation has place. Why? because in that case
except by means of individual will no schedule of entrants in judicature
has place.
or 2
Under existing system
this fixation has place
not only in fact but
of necessity — necessary
from the habit of
bandying suits from
place to place
For it is that under the whole of the technical part of it the existing
system such fixation has place not only in fact but of necessity.
Why? because not only has does such schedule of continuity
with wide gaps for the results abound but be so inlapping
in extent suits with parties and proceedings are in the case
and for the purpose of the same suit, banded as above and made to vibrate between
place and place.
☞ Give here the reason why fixture is worse than useless
or 3.
Only in one out of an
indefinite number of
cases can the interval
fixt be adapted to the
purpose.
In such suit Only in some one out of an variable and sometimes large and indefinite
number of instances can the interval fixt connect be in connection with
the interval best and most exactly adapted to the purpose. This
exception excepted the interval so fixt is either too long or too short.
If too long, the proportion to the excess in length is the feckless
— the worse than useless delay thus engendered. If too short, then
from one person to another come applications for the enlarging
it. Here then comes a suit within a suit, a first question
in addition to the original one.
Note. The greater part of the book of practice is occupied
about the fixation of these days
|
Identifier: | JB/056/190/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1827-10-20 |
or 1 - or 3 |
||
|
056 |
Law Amendment |
||
|
190 |
Law Amendment |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827 |
|||
|
Edmund Henry Barker |
|||
|
1827 |
|||
|
18246 |
|||
