JB/061/009/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/061/009/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>Law Amendment.</head>
<head>Law Amendment.</head>
<note>Propositions<lb/>
<note>Propositions<lb/>
 
<del>C II. Codification</del><add>Ch II <>
<del>C II. Codification</del><add>Ch II <gap/>eanprehence Code. Plan</add><lb/>
<unclear>Atheanprehence</unclear> Code. Plan</add><lb/>
&sect; 2. Ends in view<lb/>
&sect; 2. Ends in view<lb/>
II Subordinate<lb/>
II Subordinate<lb/>
Line 12: Line 12:
put together <del><gap/> <gap/></del> the<lb/>
put together <del><gap/> <gap/></del> the<lb/>
<del>member</del></note><lb/>
<del>member</del></note><lb/>
 
<note>30<lb/>
Absolute equality what</note>
<p>By <add>absolute</add> equality understand equality <add>as between share and share</add> of the sharing <add>respectively</add> possessed<lb/>
<p>By <add>absolute</add> equality understand equality <add>as between share and share</add> of the sharing <add>respectively</add> possessed<lb/>
<add>the several</add> <del><gap/></del> member of the community in the aggregate <add>to</add> mass of the <add>composed <del><gap/></del></add> matter of subsistence</p>
<add>the several</add> <del><gap/></del> member of the community in the aggregate mass of the <add>composed <del> should <gap/></del></add> matter of subsistence</p>


By <hi rend="underline">equality</hi> all that is here understood<add>meant</add> all that any<lb/>
<p>By <hi rend="underline">equality</hi> all that is here <del>understood</del><add>meant</add> all that any<lb/>
above consistently with common sense can be <del>understood</del><add>meant -</add> is<lb/>
above consistently with common sense can be <del>understood</del><add>meant -</add> as<lb/>
<del>such appro</del> the nearer approach <add>that can be made to such absolute be made</add> <del><gap/></del> equality <del>st<gap/></del> have<lb/>
<del>such appro</del> the nearest approach <add>that can be made to</add> equality <add>such absolute be made</add> <del><gap/></del> have <lb/>
<del>place</del> without prejudice security, subsitence or, <add>the maximum of</add> abundance<lb/>
Absolute equality, <del>as utterly</del> were it possible, would be incompatible <note>31<lb/>
Equality here meant the<lb/>
nearest approach to<lb/>
absolute equality as is<lb/>
consistent with security<lb/>
subsistence or the maximum<lb/>
of abundance</note><lb/>
with all three. But in no instance is it possible. Not so<lb/>
much as for a single moment in any commonly large enough to be<lb/>
deemed a political community can it have place: and if supposing<lb/>
it to have place for one moment, at the next moment it<lb/>next
would be at an end: at the moment of the m<gap/> enter<lb/>
or<gap/> of <gap/> a word consumed. If a <del>house</del> <add><unclear>mansion</unclear></add> could at one moment <lb/>
be cut into a million of pieces, the same mansion could not at<lb/>
a million and one pieces. This <del>also closely looked absolute</del>
equality  so far from being realised, <add>absolute equality</add> can not when closely<lb/>
looked at, be so much as conceived. Absolute equality is therefore<lb/>
neither more nor less than absolute nonsense.</p>
<note>33<lb/>
Equality practicble only<lb/>
on masses of matter of <lb/>
subsistence  left vacant<lb/>
by proprietors death &amp; on<lb/>
future contingent masses<lb/>
not yet brought into<lb/>
existence</note><lb/>


<p>Security what <del>th<gap/></del> there is of it - is <add>as to the greatest part of it</add> the product of the<lb/>
aggregate of the labour of the several <del><gap/></del> public functionaries belonging <note>34<lb/>
Security is against evil<lb/>
for modification of which<lb/>
see below</note><lb/>
to the state: the matter of subsistence and abundance - what there<lb/>
is of it - of the aggregate of the labour of the labouring part of <lb/>
the other individuals belonging to the state. Security is security<lb/>
against <hi rend="underline">evil</hi>: for the modification of which <hi rend="underline">evil</hi> is susceptible, see below</p>
<p>By whatever enactments are made for the purpose of security,<lb/>
provision is at <add>thereby</add> the same time made for the purposes<lb/>
of subsistence and abundance: which other provision is made<lb/>
with advantage for these two purposes or either of them is made<lb/>
rather by some modification applied to the one</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<p><!-- In pencil -->(2)</p>
<p>Actually existing <unclear>master</unclear> of the matter of subsistence and abundance<lb/>
and left <add>as they come to be</add> vacant by the death of the proprietor; future contingent<lb/>
master of that same matter not yet brought into existence: these<lb/>
principally if not exclusively are the subject matters capable of being<lb/>
disposed of with advantage for the purpose of <del>equable</del> practical equality without prejudice to security.</p>
<note><gap/> Observe whether some additional matter may not be <add>more</add> conveniently inserted under this head than under any suceeding one?</note>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:59, 27 May 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Decr 8

Law Amendment. Propositions
C II. CodificationCh II <> Atheanprehence Code. Plan
§ 2. Ends in view
II Subordinate
and the matter of abundance
put together the
member

30
Absolute equality what

By absolute equality understand equality as between share and share of the sharing respectively possessed
the several member of the community in the aggregate mass of the composed should matter of subsistence

By equality all that is here understoodmeant all that any
above consistently with common sense can be understoodmeant - as
such appro the nearest approach that can be made to equality such absolute be made have
place without prejudice security, subsitence or, the maximum of abundance
Absolute equality, as utterly were it possible, would be incompatible 31
Equality here meant the
nearest approach to
absolute equality as is
consistent with security
subsistence or the maximum
of abundance

with all three. But in no instance is it possible. Not so
much as for a single moment in any commonly large enough to be
deemed a political community can it have place: and if supposing
it to have place for one moment, at the next moment it
next would be at an end: at the moment of the m enter
or of a word consumed. If a house mansion could at one moment
be cut into a million of pieces, the same mansion could not at
a million and one pieces. This also closely looked absolute equality so far from being realised, absolute equality can not when closely
looked at, be so much as conceived. Absolute equality is therefore
neither more nor less than absolute nonsense.

33
Equality practicble only
on masses of matter of
subsistence left vacant
by proprietors death & on
future contingent masses
not yet brought into
existence

Security what th there is of it - is as to the greatest part of it the product of the
aggregate of the labour of the several public functionaries belonging 34
Security is against evil
for modification of which
see below

to the state: the matter of subsistence and abundance - what there
is of it - of the aggregate of the labour of the labouring part of
the other individuals belonging to the state. Security is security
against evil: for the modification of which evil is susceptible, see below

By whatever enactments are made for the purpose of security,
provision is at thereby the same time made for the purposes
of subsistence and abundance: which other provision is made
with advantage for these two purposes or either of them is made
rather by some modification applied to the one


(2)

Actually existing master of the matter of subsistence and abundance
and left as they come to be vacant by the death of the proprietor; future contingent
master of that same matter not yet brought into existence: these
principally if not exclusively are the subject matters capable of being
disposed of with advantage for the purpose of equable practical equality without prejudice to security.

Observe whether some additional matter may not be more conveniently inserted under this head than under any suceeding one?



Identifier: | JB/061/009/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 61.

Date_1

1827-12-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

30-35

Box

061

Main Headings

Law Amendment; Penal Code

Folio number

009

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C1 / E12

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

19698

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in