JB/056/240/001

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 30 +
Law Amendment

Propositions
Ch.</sic> V. Procedure<lb/.§ Expence
Litigation (false plea)

He who utters this ought to hold his
head for shame. Those looking to have
acted the part of a a public enemy
in oppression of the power — an oppressor
of the great majority —a public enemy.

If these consequences have been
procured by him he is incapable
of shame: if unprocured
he may well be ashamed of his
blandness and weakness

1
Prevention of litigation
false plea for encrease
of expence

Proposed encrease of <sic>expence of access to Judges Judicature, in
supposed of prehended justification cause — prevention of litigation
Meaning if any attached to the word litigation — demand of judiciary
service in a case in which, by the performance of the operations necessary
to the rendering it, more expence and vexation would be produced
than by the excluded.

2
results overlooked
in the allegation of
this plea
Vexation the result

Groundless and false Assumptions necessarily by included in
this notice or say

results overlooked by which for the exclusion in question the check to
litigation is regarded as an adequate justificative cause.

3
I Justice so denied to
Plaintiff
Vexation the result

I. The vexation from denial of the service of the Judge to the individual is
measure of the of the subject in distant in relation to his feelings
the express Of the importance of the matter in dispatch
to a party

Case 1. Subject matter
alleged offence affecting
person

A
1. Case the first. Case of him who by means of the expense is
prevented from becoming plaintiff Of the importance of the acting in the capacity of plaintiff.

1 Deny remedy for
the slightest offence
you deny it to homicide
deny it from one offender
you deny it from offenders<lb?>of any number.

Case 1. Subject matter of dispute complaint, alledged offences affecting
person Evil consequence of denial of justice this. Deny remedy to even the slightest wrong imaginable, you deny it to
the state of homicide. For 1. at the hands of By one and the same individual, by
continuance of or repetition of the slightest mode and degree of corporal vexation
the life of another individual may is capable of being rendered in birth
filled with sufferance to such a degree as to be intolerable.

2 so as to mental
vexation

So likewise in case of simple purely mental vexation

Case 2 Subject matter
alledged offence affecting
property
1 & 2 Evil consequences as
above 1 & 2

Case II. Subject matter of complaint alledged offences affecting
property. Evil Consequence of denial of justice 1 and 2 as the above.

3 Add the importance<lb?>of the subject matter of
the suit to the party

3. Add, in this case, the circumstance — that of the importance of the
subject matter of the suit to the party who would have been complainant [or the
party who would have been Defendant] the magnitude of the same constituting representing the subject matter
of the alledged offence is no tolerably adequate measure. To him who
would have been plaintiff, the sum demanded may be of 10,000 times the importance
it is of him who would have been Defendant: 1 as important to the one as £500 to
the other

Case III. Subject matter of offence complaint alledged offence against
reputation. Evil consequence the same as in Case I.

Case B. Case of him who by means of the <sic>expence is prevented from
Acting in the capacity of Defendant.

Identifier: | JB/056/240/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.
Date_1	1827-11-30	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-3
Box	056	Main Headings	Law Amendment
Folio number	240	Info in main headings field	Law Amendment
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C1
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals	George Bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	18296
Box Contents