JB/056/263/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/263/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1828 July 21 F1<lb/>Jud</head> <p><note>Preface?<lb/>Equity procedure</note></p> <p>1 <del>Licence to defendant not <gap/><lb/>2. <sic>Falshood</sic> not only allowed but <gap/></del></p> <!-- to the right of this text --> <p>A <del><gap/></del> <add>maxim</add> that right and wrong<lb/><del><gap/></del> <unclear>depend</unclear> on the situations<lb/>of the <del><gap/></del> agent.</p> <p><note>53. or 1<lb/>Effect of evidence allowed<lb/>to demand &#x2014; useless if not.<lb/>Defendant required to put<lb/>in an <hi rend="underline">answer</hi>, &#x2014; failing to<lb/>do so, demand <sic>altho'</sic> full of<lb/>lies declared by Judge to be<lb/>well grounded, in fact &amp; law<lb/>i.e. equity.</note></p> <p>Let it not be thought that in consideration of this<lb/>want of security for veracity supposed to be afforded by this ceremony,<lb/>the effect of evidence is refused in this same useful instrument:<lb/>unfit it could not be if this <del>privilege</del> <add><unclear>precise</unclear></add> privilege were<lb/>refused to it.  By the <del><gap/></del> instruction given <del>of</del> to him of<lb/>the utterance of this instrument, the demand is laid under the obligation<lb/>of putting in in the established form an <hi rend="underline">answer</hi> to it<lb/>(<hi rend="underline">answer</hi> is the name given to it:) should he fail to put in this<lb/>answer the demand how <del>full</del> <add>replete</add> it was with wilful <sic>falshoods</sic><lb/>is <del>assumed</del> <add><del>supposed</del> by the Judge inferred and assured</add> to be well grounded, and that as well as point<lb/>of fact as in point of <del>the <gap/></del> law: meaning the improved sort of<lb/>law distinguished from the common sort by the appellation of Equity.</p>
<head>1828 July 21 F1<lb/>Jud</head> <p><note>Preface?<lb/>Equity procedure</note></p> <p>1 <del>Licence to defendant not <gap/><lb/>2. <sic>Falshood</sic> not only allowed but <unclear>expected</unclear></del></p> <!-- to the right of this text --> <p>A <del><gap/></del> <add>maxim</add> that right and wrong<lb/><del><gap/></del> <unclear>depend</unclear> on the situations<lb/>of the <del><gap/></del> agent.</p> <p><note>53. or 1<lb/>Effect of evidence allowed<lb/>to demand &#x2014; useless if not.<lb/>Defendant required to put<lb/>in an <hi rend="underline">answer</hi>, &#x2014; failing to<lb/>do so, demand <sic>altho'</sic> full of<lb/>lies declared by Judge to be<lb/>well grounded, in fact &amp; law<lb/>i.e. equity.</note></p> <p>Let it not be thought that in consideration of this<lb/>want of security for veracity supposed to be afforded by this ceremony,<lb/>the effect of evidence is refused in this same useful instrument:<lb/>unfit it could not be if this <del>privilege</del> <add><unclear>precise</unclear></add> privilege were<lb/>refused to it.  By the <del><gap/></del> instruction given <del>of</del> to him of<lb/>the utterance of this instrument, the demand is laid under the obligation<lb/>of putting in in the established form an <hi rend="underline">answer</hi> to it<lb/>(<hi rend="underline">answer</hi> is the name given to it:) should he fail to put in this<lb/>answer the demand how <del>full</del> <add>replete</add> it was with wilful <sic>falshoods</sic><lb/>is <del>assumed</del> <add><del>supposed</del> by the Judge inferred and assured</add> to be well grounded, and that as well as point<lb/>of fact as in point of <del>the <gap/></del> law: meaning the improved sort of<lb/>law distinguished from the common sort by the appellation of Equity.</p>
   
   
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:12, 6 October 2025

Click Here To Edit

1828 July 21 F1
Jud

Preface?
Equity procedure

1 Licence to defendant not
2. Falshood not only allowed but expected

A maxim that right and wrong
depend on the situations
of the agent.

53. or 1
Effect of evidence allowed
to demand — useless if not.
Defendant required to put
in an answer, — failing to
do so, demand altho' full of
lies declared by Judge to be
well grounded, in fact & law
i.e. equity.

Let it not be thought that in consideration of this
want of security for veracity supposed to be afforded by this ceremony,
the effect of evidence is refused in this same useful instrument:
unfit it could not be if this privilege precise privilege were
refused to it. By the instruction given of to him of
the utterance of this instrument, the demand is laid under the obligation
of putting in in the established form an answer to it
(answer is the name given to it:) should he fail to put in this
answer the demand how full replete it was with wilful falshoods
is assumed supposed by the Judge inferred and assured to be well grounded, and that as well as point
of fact as in point of the law: meaning the improved sort of
law distinguished from the common sort by the appellation of Equity.



Identifier: | JB/056/263/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1828-07-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

53 or 1

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

263

Info in main headings field

Jud

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C1 / F19

Penner

Watermarks

B&M 1828

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Arthur Moore; Richard Doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

18319

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in