JB/004/200/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/004/200/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


<p>1830. July 29</p>
<p>1830. July 29</p>
<head>Review</head>
<head>Review.</head>
<note>t<gap/> <gap/><lb/>
<note>Tout <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
First comes<lb/>the device of<lb/>
First comes<lb/>
the device of<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">fixt</hi><lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">fixt</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">time<</hi>/note>
<hi rend="underline">time<</hi>/note><lb/>
<p>&sect;89 1. First comes the device of the <hi rend="underline">fixt time</hi> that device<lb/>
<p>&sect;89 1. First comes the device of the <hi rend="underline">fixt time</hi> that device<lb/>
stript of its <add>sophistry</add> varnish and held up to <del><gap/> <gap/></del><add>just</add> mitigation<lb/>
stript of its <add>sophistry</add> varnish and held up to <del><gap/> <gap/></del><add>just</add> mitigation<lb/>
Line 14: Line 15:
long or too short for justice in every case but one and of a <lb/>
long or too short for justice in every case but one and of a <lb/>
number indefinitely large: when too long, precluder of <lb/>
number indefinitely large: when too long, precluder of <lb/>
<gap/> and factitious delay by the amount of the difference  <note>the allegaton been a  wilful be drawn<lb/>
mischief and factitious delay by the amount of the difference  <note>the allegaton been a  wilful be drawn<lb/>
up for <gap/>, by the la<gap/> <add>the special <gap/></add> in the other <gap/><lb/>
up for lease, by the lawyer <add>the special pleader</add> in the other side<lb/>
and known and  included so to <gap/> be<lb/>
and known and  included so to be by<lb/>
than our Reformist</note><lb/>
than our Reformist</note><lb/>
when too short production <add>either</add> of ungrounded conclusions, and<lb/>
when too short productive <add>either</add> of ungrounded conclusions, and<lb/>
oppressive and pr<gap/> operations in in consequence order<lb/>
oppressive and prid<gap/> operations in in consequence order<lb/>
<add><del>in</del></add> <del>of apt</del> in <gap/> individual case an unavoidable app<gap/><lb/><lb/>
<add><del>in</del></add> <del>of apt</del> in each individual case an unavoidable app<gap/><lb/>
in <gap/> another <gap/> to be added to the list of re<gap/><lb/>
far more time, that is to say another suit written<lb/>
in <gap/> another when to be added to the list of re<gap/><lb/>
already above exhibited</p>
already above exhibited</p>
<note>up that whole (accidents excepted) must to by perfect knowledge. to a down <add>an absolute</add> right <gap/> and the law be employs the authority of King &amp; Lord and Commons<lb/>
<note>up that whole (accidents excepted) must to by perfect knowledge. to a down <add>an absolute</add> right lie and the law he employs the authority of King &amp; Lord and Commons<lb/>
to crime done <gap/> Judges thr<gap/> , crude order to disgorge it: "<del><gap/></del>"</note> such party shall <add>in <gap/> default</add> be deemed to have confessed the matter alledged against him.<add>[+]</add><lb/>
to crime done <gap/> Judges thr<gap/> , each order to disgorge it: "<del><gap/></del>" such party shall <add>in <gap/> default</add> be deemed to have confessed the matter alledged against him.<add>[+]</add></note><lb/>


<p>Now as to the ungrounded conclusion? it is the <gap/><lb/>
<p>Now as to the ungrounded conclusion? it is the <gap/><lb/>
so often already brought to view: wilful obituary the cause<lb/>
so often already brought to view: wilful obituary the cause<lb/>
imputed cause, wh<gap/>  points <del>the <gap/></del> in <gap/>ing cases the<lb/>
imputed cause, wh<gap/>  points <del>the <gap/></del> in many cases the<lb/>
work of this reformer with his Bill is the real one<lb/>
work of this reformer with his Bill is the real one<lb/>
<del>Would be</del> Of these two so opposite states<add>causes</add> of things would<lb/>
<del>Would be</del> Of these two so opposite states<add>causes</add> of things would<lb/>
be <del>wish to</del> in any individual instance<add>wish</add> <gap/>ive which was the real<lb/>
he <del>wish to</del> in any individual instance<add>wish</add> <gap/>ive which was the real<lb/>
ones why not set be Judge to see the defeated <gap/> past the<lb/>
ones why not set be Judge to see the defeated not just the<lb/>
question to him.  With all has so highly <gap/>ointed ignorance<lb/>
question to him.  With all his so highly <gap/>ointed ignorance<lb/>
or worn their ignorance, he is not yet so ignorant as not to<lb/>
or worn their ignorance, he is not yet so ignorant as not to<lb/>
know, that the way to have <gap/> aware as to put a question</p>  
know, that the way to how one means is to put a question</p>  
<note>His object not to<lb/>
<note>His object not to<lb/>
know the truth<lb/>
know the truth<lb/>
but to avoid<lb/>
but to avoid<lb/>
knowing the truth</note><lb/>
knowing the truth</note><lb/>
But what he wanted was not to know the truth, but to<lb/>
<p>But what he wanted was a list to know the truth, but to<lb/>
<p>avoid learning the truth: and why avoid hearing the truth? <add>But</add> for the<lb/>
avoid learning the truth: and why avoid hearing the truth? <add>But</add> for the<lb/>
purpose, that a pretence may have place for signing an enter<gap/><lb/>
purpose, that a pretence may have place for signing an enter<gap/><lb/>
Judgement with fees for the same, and "<hi rend="underline">notes</hi> to <add>the</add> <gap/>thing <gap/>" under<lb/>
Judgement with fees for the same, and "<hi rend="underline">notes</hi> to <add>the</add> one thing and" notes<lb/>
to the <gap/>ndle, in the <gap/>ing sh<gap/></p>
to the <gap/>ndle, in the <gap/>ing sh<gap/></p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>
Suppose a defin<gap/> to have stored up a Court, and send to it<lb/>
Suppose a defendant to learn stand up a Court, and send to it<lb/>
Judge . <gap/>. All the money I can comment his <gap/> b<gap/> <gap/> take from an<lb/>
Judge . <gap/>. All the money I can comment his <gap/> b<gap/> <gap/> take from one<lb/>
by these learned <gap/>, and though I have conclusive evidence of my<lb/>
by these learned <gap/>, and though I have conclusive evidence of my<lb/>
right to what is in dispute it is altogether out of my power to obtain it. <add>Our</add>
right to what is in dispute it is altogether out of my power to obtain it. <add>Our</add>
Line 53: Line 55:
<note><p>Reformist will be suffer<lb/>
<note><p>Reformist will be suffer<lb/>
to Judge to speak its truth<lb/>
to Judge to speak its truth<lb/>
out of to between in the<lb/>
and of to between in the<lb/>
but of distrust, say so <lb/>
but of distress, say so <lb/>
and act accordingly?</p>
and act accordingly?</p>
Not be indeed, the <gap/><lb/>
Not be indeed, the <gap/><lb/>
<gap/>p that whole (accidents excepted0 must be by profit knowledge be a down right  <add>an absolute</add> lie and this lie he employs the authority of King <gap/> and Co<gap/><lb/>
<note><gap/>p that whole (accidents excepted0 must be by profit knowledge be a down right  <add>an absolute</add> lie and this lie he employs the authority of King <gap/> and Co<gap/><lb/>
to <gap/> be Judges thr<gap/> thrones, which order to disgorge it? "<del><gap/></del>" such <gap/> shall <add>in <gap/> default</add> be deemed to have have confessed the matter alledged against him <add>{+}</add></note>
to <gap/> be Judges thr<gap/> thrones, which order to disgorge it? "<del><gap/></del>" such <gap/> shall <add>in <gap/> default</add> be deemed to have have confessed the matter alledged against him <add>{+}</add> </note>
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
"{{In_Progress}}
"{{In_Progress}}

Latest revision as of 16:28, 8 October 2025

Click Here To Edit

1830. July 29

Review. Tout
First comes
the device of
the fixt
time</note>

§89 1. First comes the device of the fixt time that device
stript of its sophistry varnish and held up to just mitigation
consequence and to certainty of the delaysintervals being either too
long or too short for justice in every case but one and of a
number indefinitely large: when too long, precluder of
mischief and factitious delay by the amount of the difference <note>the allegaton been a wilful be drawn
up for lease, by the lawyer the special pleader in the other side
and known and included so to be by
than our Reformist
when too short productive either of ungrounded conclusions, and
oppressive and prid operations in in consequence order
in of apt in each individual case an unavoidable app
far more time, that is to say another suit written
in another when to be added to the list of re
already above exhibited

up that whole (accidents excepted) must to by perfect knowledge. to a down an absolute right lie and the law he employs the authority of King & Lord and Commons
to crime done Judges thr , each order to disgorge it: "" such party shall in default be deemed to have confessed the matter alledged against him.[+]

Now as to the ungrounded conclusion? it is the
so often already brought to view: wilful obituary the cause
imputed cause, wh points the in many cases the
work of this reformer with his Bill is the real one
Would be Of these two so opposite statescauses of things would
he wish to in any individual instancewish ive which was the real
ones why not set be Judge to see the defeated not just the
question to him. With all his so highly ointed ignorance
or worn their ignorance, he is not yet so ignorant as not to
know, that the way to how one means is to put a question

His object not to
know the truth
but to avoid
knowing the truth

But what he wanted was a list to know the truth, but to
avoid learning the truth: and why avoid hearing the truth? But for the
purpose, that a pretence may have place for signing an enter
Judgement with fees for the same, and "notes to the one thing and" notes
to the ndle, in the ing sh


Suppose a defendant to learn stand up a Court, and send to it
Judge . . All the money I can comment his b take from one
by these learned , and though I have conclusive evidence of my
right to what is in dispute it is altogether out of my power to obtain it. Our

Reformist will be suffer
to Judge to speak its truth
and of to between in the
but of distress, say so
and act accordingly?

Not be indeed, the
<note>p that whole (accidents excepted0 must be by profit knowledge be a down right an absolute lie and this lie he employs the authority of King and Co
to be Judges thr thrones, which order to disgorge it? "" such shall in default be deemed to have have confessed the matter alledged against him {+}



Identifier: | JB/004/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-07-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / c2 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1828

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

2121

Box Contents

"

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in