JB/116/615/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/615/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
would undertake to answer for: I would not
would undertake to answer for: I would not
<lb/>
<lb/>
haggle for a few millions <add>*</add>: no, my Lord, nor for a
haggle for a few millions <add>*</add> <note>* The prison architecture , Blackburn's plan for Battersea kin would perhaps <unclear>ner</unclear><!-- or, 'nor' --> have been more than about 15 times as much as the Panopticon plan ,instead of the <add>20 or</add></note>: no, my Lord, nor for a
<lb/>
<lb/>
few dozen millions .  A point I can speak to
few dozen millions .  A point I can speak to
Line 39: Line 39:
that may have unintentionally attached itself
that may have unintentionally attached itself
<lb/>
<lb/>
to so unavoidably rough an estimate &#x2014;
to so unavoidably rough an estimate &#x2014; if so
 
<lb/>
 
powerful a security against misrepresentation be
 
<lb/>
not yet sufficient , I would by leave to refer
<lb/>
Your Lordship to the still more <add>resplendent</add> <del>splendid</del> talents of
<lb/>
the late official sub-professor of political economy ,
<lb/>
whose share in the glories of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt's poor plan
<lb/>
is without dispute , and who on all <sic>agreable</sic>
<lb/>
occasions is so fond of "arithmetic and its calculations ".  Industry houses upon the <unclear>gallagher</unclear> scale <add>and</add>
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>



Revision as of 17:33, 16 May 2012

Click Here To Edit


16-May-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


18 Letter 3d

Even as to the eventual amount of the expence,
intended or not intended , that the rule of three ,
as above employed should, without any further
data be correctly sufficient , is more than I
would undertake to answer for: I would not
haggle for a few millions * * The prison architecture , Blackburn's plan for Battersea kin would perhaps ner have been more than about 15 times as much as the Panopticon plan ,instead of the 20 or: no, my Lord, nor for a
few dozen millions . A point I can speak to
with more confidence , is — that the talents which
gave birth to that determination , or at any rate
to the professions made of it , are the very same
which the public is every day experiencing the
benefit of under Your Lordship's auspices : and if
the check which Your Lordship is thus fortunate
enough to possess , for the correction of any error
that may have unintentionally attached itself
to so unavoidably rough an estimate — if so
powerful a security against misrepresentation be
not yet sufficient , I would by leave to refer
Your Lordship to the still more resplendent splendid talents of
the late official sub-professor of political economy ,
whose share in the glories of Mr Pitt's poor plan
is without dispute , and who on all agreable
occasions is so fond of "arithmetic and its calculations ". Industry houses upon the gallagher scale and



Identifier: | JB/116/615/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

615

Info in main headings field

letter 3d

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d18

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7

ID Number

38148

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in