★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
| No edit summary | No edit summary | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| <head>Marginal <lb/> Connect<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Observ<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>(Incapacity<lb/>(Killing no murder</head> <lb/> | <head>Marginal <lb/> Connect<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> Observ<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>(Incapacity<lb/>(Killing no murder</head> <lb/> | ||
| <p>Killing no Murder</p> <p> 7. <lb/>2. Pitt's speech when <lb/> he was told of the <lb/> <unclear>loss</unclear>if the season <lb/> through the (probably <lb/> wilful)  | <p>Killing no Murder</p> <p> 7. <lb/>2. Pitt's speech when <lb/> he was told of the <lb/> <unclear>loss</unclear>if the season <lb/> through the (probably <lb/> wilful) neglect of <lb/> his own instruments. <lb/>He imputed it to <lb/>J.B. & exulted in it.</p> <p> 8<lb/> In the whole seven <lb/> years never the <lb/> least expression of <lb/> sympathy from Long <lb/> - i.e. to JB. for J.B<hi rend="superscript">s</hi><lb/> <unclear>sufferings</unclear> - only at <lb/> first for Pitts violated <lb/> honour. - </p> <p>Proof of mala <lb/> fides <lb/> 8. The dukes a fraud <lb/> or <gap/> of these <lb/> letters - so that after <lb/> this <hi rend="underline">he</hi> writes no <lb/> more</p> <unclear>Confession</unclear> <lb/> <p>He may do what he <lb/> pleases in the <gap/> <lb/> condition - and <lb/> to some men use a <lb/> very <sic>burthernsome</sic> <gap/> <lb/> of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> *truth - <lb/> Better to have it <gap/> <add> <gap/> </add> <lb/> <gap/> them with it. </p> <p> Conclusion <lb/>Justification <gap/> <lb/> Had the <gap/> been <lb/> that of Statesmen  <add> <gap/> they <lb/> might have passed thereafter <lb/> in <gap/>.   But their <lb/><gap/> <add> <del> <gap/> </del> </add> having been <lb/> that of malefactors, <lb/> their place is among <lb/> malefactors. <lb/> <unclear>&c</unclear></p> <p>Conclusion. <gap/> <lb/> <del>5</del> Public <gap/> record <lb/> 1. To give to the Establishment <lb/> at least the <gap/> <lb/> promised <lb/>2.  <gap/> <gap/> to <lb/> J.B. for past <gap/> <lb/> and humiliations </p> <p> 3. <gap/> and the Authors <lb/> of the <gap/> -& breach <lb/> of public <unclear>fuilli</unclear>. </p> <note>[+] <gap/> they all <gap/> matter of fact by way of excuse, the question is whether every <unclear>bilewick</unclear> in it <gap/> ?</note><lb/><p>4.  L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Pelham applied to <lb/> as a Mediator. </p> <pb/><p> Inadvertence</p> <p> All pretences of it are <lb/> out of the question for <lb/> the <unclear>Duke</unclear>  A man to say<add> says <gap/> </add> <lb/> he has read the <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> he understands the effect <lb/> of it, <lb/> <del> Baldw</del> Civil List <lb/> <gap/> Times 23 March <lb/> 1802 <lb/>"W Baldwin Esq" as a <lb/> reward for his advice in <lb/> Counsel to the Secretary of State <lb/> in 1800 £1.624 <lb/>1801  655 7<hi rend="superscript">'</hi> 6<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/> 1802  547 12<hi rend="superscript">'</hi></p> <p><del>[the Letter <gap/> only </del><lb/> <del>the greatest number: but </del> <lb/> <del><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> the <hi rend="underline">increase:</hi>  but the <lb/> design in <gap/> the </del> </p><p> The <gap/> prior <lb/> <gap/> the <gap/> <lb/> The Treasury friend <hi rend="underline">acts</hi><lb/> the Duke <unclear><hi rend="underline">principili</hi></unclear></p> <p> <unclear>Pulman's case <hi rend="underline">harsh</hi>:</unclear><lb/> <gap/> <hi rend="underline">illegal</hi>. </p> <p> <del> The Duke &c had as </del><lb/><del> sure of a plan for subverting</del> <lb/><del> the Construction, <gap/> <gap/></del>  <lb/> <del>least.</del></p> <p><del> <gap/> <gap/>Judge decides </del><lb/><del> there be <gap/> <gap/> </del><lb/><del> <gap/> the money <gap/></del> <lb/><del> Parliament in case of</del> <lb/> <del>danger and think he</del> <lb/><del> was <gap/> of the danger.</del> </p> <p><del> The Duke conceives that <lb/> he may annul <add> rescind</add> an <lb/> imperative act of Parl' <lb/> if it be an improper: <lb/> and that he a judge <lb/> of the impropriety.</del> </p> <p><del> He also concurs that <lb/> it belongs to him to size <lb/> up the minds of the <lb/> <gap/> if it be probable <lb/> that they would <lb/> <gap/> infrequently<lb/> and he concurs <lb/> that it is probable.</del> </p> <p> It is not worth <gap/> <lb/> over these <gap/> that <lb/> man set to make <lb/> execute or annull <add> repeal <add> abrogate</add></add> <lb/> laws. </p> <p> Conclusion Addington <lb/> G. <gap/> said of the <lb/> <gap/> Administrator<lb/> 1. because of the power it <lb/> gives me to <gap/> of it <lb/> 2. Because it will be the <lb/> subject of a <gap/> <unclear>picker</unclear></p> <p> Dispensing Power </p> <p>3  1<lb/> The illegality of the <lb/> Dukes & King's exercise <lb/> of the dispensing <lb/> power could not <lb/> but have been <lb/> fully known to them - <lb/> they had full notice <lb/> of it. - p.1. </p> <p>4   2 <lb/> It was <add> not </add> a mere <lb/><add> <del> so not a <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/> honest misconstruction <lb/> of the Act. p.1. </p> <p> <del>5</del>  3. <lb/> The Act has no <lb/> words in it on which <lb/> any misconstruction <lb/> could be put. p.2.<lb/> <del> 4 </del> </p><p> <del> 6 </del> 4 <lb/> <del>The Duke says he has <lb/> read the Acts - but <lb/> if this were admitted <lb/> as a proof of misconstruction - <lb/> any man <lb/> in his place might <lb/> overrule an Act of <lb/> Parliament on condition <lb/> of pretending to read <lb/> in it what is not <lb/> there p.2.3.</del> </p> <p> 12  5 <lb/> Weakness of intellect <lb/> no excuse - <lb/> He meant no <lb/> harm - that is when <lb/> he committed the <lb/> crime he did not <lb/> think there was <lb/> any danger of his <lb/> being punished for <lb/> it. - p.4 </p> 13  6 <lb/> <p>All he chose to think <lb/> of was that he was <lb/> serving his friends <lb/> but he could not <lb/> but know that it <lb/>was by <sic>manipling</sic> <lb/> on the law. - p.4.<lb/> 5. </p> <p><del>1 <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <lb/> 2. Imprisonment <lb/> not according to <lb/> <gap/> + <lb/>3. 40 days, only <gap/> <lb/> this by ruling by fraud. <lb/> 4 <gap/> law to create the <lb/> <gap/> </del></p> <pb/><p>Dispensing Power </p> <p>7 <lb/> The Duke learnt from <lb/> Baldwin that the <lb/> only person who <lb/> could have to complain <lb/> of it was one <lb/> from whom he had <lb/> no danger to apprehend. </p> <p> Baldwin's account <lb/> of JB. p.5, 6,7. </p> <p> <add> 15 </add> 8.<lb/> The genuineness of <lb/> it is established by <lb/> intrinsic evidence. <lb/> p.7 </p> <p><add> 16</add> 9. <add> 18 </add><lb/> 1.  Being a matter <lb/> of law the Duke <lb/> thought King alone <lb/> would be responsible <lb/> for it - as he took <lb/> no money for it - <lb/> & it was only to <lb/> oblige hid friend - <lb/> p.8. </p> <p> <del>10<lb/> 2.  Their best chance <lb/> for escape is the <lb/> ridicule attached to <lb/> the idea of a great <lb/> crime committed <lb/> by one personally <lb/> so little. - p.9.</del> </p> <p> <add> 18 </add> 11. <lb/> This plea ought not <lb/> to be admitted even <lb/> in extenuation - <lb/> Not only in itself <lb/> the offence was mischievous -<lb/> but as a <lb/> precedent if unpunished <lb/> it would be dangerous. <lb/> p.10, 11 </p> <p> 7   12. <lb/> That the crime was <lb/> unnecessary since the <lb/> object of the conspiracy <lb/> could have been equally <lb/> attained without <lb/> it - neither <lb/> justification nor <lb/> extenuation. p.11 </p> <pb/> <p>Dispensing Power </p> <p> <add> 23 </add> 8  13. <lb/> 4.  The crime might equally <lb/> have been committed without <lb/> the letter that furnished <lb/> the proof of it. <lb/> - but this proves <lb/> folly only but no innocence. <lb/> p.12 </p> <p> <add> 23 </add> 9  14. <lb/> The act might mave <lb/> passed as an honest error <lb/> if the criminal principle <lb/> had not been avowed <lb/> by the foolish letter. p.13 </p> <p> <add> 25 </add> 10  15 <lb/>This no more <del> than </del> an <lb/> excuse than it would <lb/> be to a thief to say I <lb/> should not have been <lb/> found out if I had <lb/> not betrayed myself. <lb/> p.14 </p> <p> <add> 21  2 </add> 16 <lb/> The act contains all the <lb/> ingredients of criminality. <lb/> 1. Act requires Panopticon <lb/> to be built. <lb/> 2. Panopticon unbuilt. <lb/> 3. The Duke &c stopping it. <lb/> 4. Sending <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> that should be put there. <lb/> 5. Calling it in.  mocking <lb/> a law of Parliament. <lb/> 7. Knowing that there  <lb/> is nothing in the law <lb/> of Parliament to <lb/> warrant it. p.15<del>16</del> </p><p><add> 1 <hi rend="superscript">2</hi> 17: <add> <gap/> </add> <lb/> (This is legislative power - <lb/> (a much greater power <lb/> (than dispensing  - <lb/>(the crime of usurping <lb/> (it so much the worse p.16 </p><p><del><add> 11</add> 18 <add> v.g. </add> <lb/>Taking money for it <lb/> would only have made <lb/> the proof more simple <lb/> but not the crime or <lb/> unfitness greater - <lb/> there are more species <lb/> of <hi rend="underline">corruption</hi> besides <lb/> <hi rend="underline">that</hi>. - p.16, 17 </del></p> <p>19 <lb/> The Duke &c thought <lb/> themselves safe because <lb/> opposition <lb/> was quiet but the <lb/> time was not ripe for <lb/> the thieftakers. p.18 </p> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
| {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Marginal 
 Connects Observs(Incapacity
(Killing no murder 
Killing no Murder
 7. 
2. Pitt's speech when 
 he was told of the 
 lossif the season 
 through the (probably 
 wilful) neglect of 
 his own instruments. 
He imputed it to 
J.B. & exulted in it.
 8
 In the whole seven 
 years never the 
 least expression of 
 sympathy from Long 
 - i.e. to JB. for J.Bs
 sufferings - only at 
 first for Pitts violated 
 honour. - 
Proof of mala 
 fides 
 8. The dukes a fraud 
 or  of these 
 letters - so that after 
 this he writes no 
 more
Confession 
 
He may do what he 
 pleases in the  
 condition - and 
 to some men use a 
 very burthernsome  
 of   
 *truth - 
 Better to have it     
  them with it. 
 Conclusion 
Justification  
 Had the  been 
 that of Statesmen    they 
 might have passed thereafter 
 in .   But their 
 <add>     having been 
 that of malefactors, 
 their place is among 
 malefactors. 
 &c
Conclusion.  
 5 Public  record 
 1. To give to the Establishment 
 at least the  
 promised 
2.    to 
 J.B. for past  
 and humiliations 
 3.  and the Authors 
 of the  -& breach 
 of public fuilli. 
[+]  they all  matter of fact by way of excuse, the question is whether every bilewick in it  ?
4.  Ld Pelham applied to 
 as a Mediator. 
---page break---
Inadvertence
 All pretences of it are 
 out of the question for 
 the Duke  A man to say says   
 he has read the   
 he understands the effect 
 of it, 
  Baldw Civil List 
  Times 23 March 
 1802 
"W Baldwin Esq" as a 
 reward for his advice in 
 Counsel to the Secretary of State 
 in 1800 £1.624 
1801  655 7' 6d
 1802  547 12'
[the Letter  only 
 the greatest number: but  
  the increase:  but the 
 design in  the  
 The  prior 
  the  
 The Treasury friend acts
 the Duke principili
 Pulman's case harsh:
  illegal. 
  The Duke &c had as 
 sure of a plan for subverting 
 the Construction,    
 least.
  Judge decides 
 there be   
  the money  
 Parliament in case of 
 danger and think he 
 was  of the danger. 
 The Duke conceives that 
 he may annul  rescind an 
 imperative act of Parl' 
 if it be an improper: 
 and that he a judge 
 of the impropriety. 
 He also concurs that 
 it belongs to him to size 
 up the minds of the 
  if it be probable 
 that they would 
  infrequently
 and he concurs 
 that it is probable. 
 It is not worth  
 over these  that 
 man set to make 
 execute or annull  repeal <add> abrogate</add> 
 laws. 
 Conclusion Addington 
 G.  said of the 
  Administrator
 1. because of the power it 
 gives me to  of it 
 2. Because it will be the 
 subject of a  picker
Dispensing Power
3  1
 The illegality of the 
 Dukes & King's exercise 
 of the dispensing 
 power could not 
 but have been 
 fully known to them - 
 they had full notice 
 of it. - p.1. 
4   2 
 It was  not  a mere 
  so not a      
 honest misconstruction 
 of the Act. p.1. 
 5  3. 
 The Act has no 
 words in it on which 
 any misconstruction 
 could be put. p.2.
  4  
  6  4 
 The Duke says he has 
 read the Acts - but 
 if this were admitted 
 as a proof of misconstruction - 
 any man 
 in his place might 
 overrule an Act of 
 Parliament on condition 
 of pretending to read 
 in it what is not 
 there p.2.3. 
 12  5 
 Weakness of intellect 
 no excuse - 
 He meant no 
 harm - that is when 
 he committed the 
 crime he did not 
 think there was 
 any danger of his 
 being punished for 
 it. - p.4 
 13  6 
 
All he chose to think 
 of was that he was 
 serving his friends 
 but he could not 
 but know that it 
was by manipling 
 on the law. - p.4.
 5. 
1  
 2. Imprisonment 
 not according to 
  + 
3. 40 days, only  
 this by ruling by fraud. 
 4  law to create the 
  
---page break---
Dispensing Power
7 
 The Duke learnt from 
 Baldwin that the 
 only person who 
 could have to complain 
 of it was one 
 from whom he had 
 no danger to apprehend. 
 Baldwin's account 
 of JB. p.5, 6,7. 
  15  8.
 The genuineness of 
 it is established by 
 intrinsic evidence. 
 p.7 
 16 9.  18 
 1.  Being a matter 
 of law the Duke 
 thought King alone 
 would be responsible 
 for it - as he took 
 no money for it - 
 & it was only to 
 oblige hid friend - 
 p.8. 
 10
 2.  Their best chance 
 for escape is the 
 ridicule attached to 
 the idea of a great 
 crime committed 
 by one personally 
 so little. - p.9. 
  18  11. 
 This plea ought not 
 to be admitted even 
 in extenuation - 
 Not only in itself 
 the offence was mischievous -
 but as a 
 precedent if unpunished 
 it would be dangerous. 
 p.10, 11 
 7   12. 
 That the crime was 
 unnecessary since the 
 object of the conspiracy 
 could have been equally 
 attained without 
 it - neither 
 justification nor 
 extenuation. p.11 
---page break---
 
Dispensing Power
  23  8  13. 
 4.  The crime might equally 
 have been committed without 
 the letter that furnished 
 the proof of it. 
 - but this proves 
 folly only but no innocence. 
 p.12 
  23  9  14. 
 The act might mave 
 passed as an honest error 
 if the criminal principle 
 had not been avowed 
 by the foolish letter. p.13 
  25  10  15 
This no more  than  an 
 excuse than it would 
 be to a thief to say I 
 should not have been 
 found out if I had 
 not betrayed myself. 
 p.14 
  21  2  16 
 The act contains all the 
 ingredients of criminality. 
 1. Act requires Panopticon 
 to be built. 
 2. Panopticon unbuilt. 
 3. The Duke &c stopping it. 
 4. Sending   
 that should be put there. 
 5. Calling it in.  mocking 
 a law of Parliament. 
 7. Knowing that there  
 is nothing in the law 
 of Parliament to 
 warrant it. p.1516 
 1 2 17: <add>   
 (This is legislative power - 
 (a much greater power 
 (than dispensing  - 
(the crime of usurping 
 (it so much the worse p.16 
 11 18  v.g.  
Taking money for it 
 would only have made 
 the proof more simple 
 but not the crime or 
 unfitness greater - 
 there are more species 
 of corruption besides 
 that. - p.16, 17 
19 
 The Duke &c thought 
 themselves safe because 
 opposition 
 was quiet but the 
 time was not ripe for 
 the thieftakers. p.18 
| Identifier: | JB/121/013/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5, 1-6, 1-19 | |||
| 121 | Panopticon | ||
| 013 | Marginal Contents Incapacity Killing no murder Connectg Observs | ||
| 003 | Incapacity / Killing no murder / Dispensing Power | ||
| Marginal summary sheet | 2 | ||
| Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. | A10 / F10 | ||
| CW 1799 | |||
| C. Abbit Lees | |||
| 1799 | |||
| 003 | |||