JB/031/071/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/031/071/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1828 <sic>Sept.</sic> 28<lb/>Blackstone</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>All<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Universal Jurisprudence<lb/>&sect; Wrongs maleficent acts<lb/>Offences</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Conspiracy vague<lb/>meaning attached<lb/>to the word</note></p> <p>The word <hi rend="underline">conspiracy</hi> <add>if well managed</add> is of itself enough for our<lb/>purpose: it is a mere waste of words to employ any<lb/>of those others.  Two men do something <add>some act</add> any act, in<lb/>apparent concert, the act <del>does not</del> <add>a</add> cause: it does<lb/>not come under any <add>of the</add> denominations employed in giving<lb/>names to a crime: if it did, we should punish men<lb/>for it under that name.  We therefore assume its being<lb/>a criminal act: which being assumed, the being engaged<lb/>in it is a <hi rend="underline">conspiracy</hi>: and <hi rend="underline">conspiracy</hi> whatsoever<lb/>be the act to which is done in concert is <del>already</del><lb/>among the acts which we have already succeeded in<lb/>aggregating to our stock of crimes and punishing as such.</p> <p>But in the first instance, as above, to <del>the <gap/></del><lb/>warrant us in treating the act in question as a<lb/>crime two persons at least engaged in it in concert<lb/>or at any rate <add>presumed and</add> said by is to be so engaged in it<lb/>were deemed <add>considered</add> necessary.  On another occasion not<lb/><del><gap/></del> more than one person can be found engaged in<lb/>it: no matter: the act being already constituted a<lb/><del><gap/></del> crime &#x2014; aggregated to our stock of crimes, <del>is it<lb/>a reason for letting off a criminal</del> a man's being<lb/>the only one engaged in crime &#x2014; is that a reason<lb/>for leaving him unpunished?</p> <p><sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham once published a pamphlet against<lb/>this mode of manufactory <foreign>male <unclear>prohibite</unclear></foreign> and<lb/>making them into crimes: his <add>more</add> particular object on that<lb/>occasion was, to save his gangs of criminals from<lb/><gap/> punishment.  The late Major Cartwright of<lb/><hi rend="underline">Give us our rights</hi> memory and Sir Charles Wolseley<lb/>were of the number.  <del>M</del> I employed  <add>the late</add> <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> <del>J</del> Benyon<lb/>as Attorney General for Chester, and <sic>Mr</sic> Justice Warren as Judge<lb/><add>for</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> for <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> to answer the<lb/>pamphlet.  They did so<lb/>saying that wise men<lb/>sometimes did foolish<lb/>things.  This was at once<lb/>civil and effectual.  The<lb/>Jury were satisfied by it,<lb/>and said Guilty!</p> <!-- continues along the edge of the page --> <p>We cannot punish a man for any thing we please; for one thing as well as another.  Suppose for example a fancy took us for punishing <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Bentham for his pamphlet: we would punish him as for a libel: &#x2014; we would punish him as for a conspiracy.  In this case we could <del>say to</del> speak [+]1<lb/><!-- additional text written above -->[+] of him as having conspired with the Printer:<lb/>or if we had a mind to scare the Printer, we<lb/>might put John Doe into the indictment<lb/>in his stead.  To be sure John Doe [+]2<lb/>[+]2 could <del>b</del> not be found: for though continually<lb/>hunted he is never found.  But is that a reason<lb/>why a conspirator such as <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham should<lb/>go unpunished.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:27, 11 March 2024

Click Here To Edit

1828 Sept. 28
Blackstone

All
Ch. Universal Jurisprudence
§ Wrongs maleficent acts
Offences

6
Conspiracy vague
meaning attached
to the word

The word conspiracy if well managed is of itself enough for our
purpose: it is a mere waste of words to employ any
of those others. Two men do something some act any act, in
apparent concert, the act does not a cause: it does
not come under any of the denominations employed in giving
names to a crime: if it did, we should punish men
for it under that name. We therefore assume its being
a criminal act: which being assumed, the being engaged
in it is a conspiracy: and conspiracy whatsoever
be the act to which is done in concert is already
among the acts which we have already succeeded in
aggregating to our stock of crimes and punishing as such.

But in the first instance, as above, to the
warrant us in treating the act in question as a
crime two persons at least engaged in it in concert
or at any rate presumed and said by is to be so engaged in it
were deemed considered necessary. On another occasion not
more than one person can be found engaged in
it: no matter: the act being already constituted a
crime — aggregated to our stock of crimes, is it
a reason for letting off a criminal
a man's being
the only one engaged in crime — is that a reason
for leaving him unpunished?

Mr Bentham once published a pamphlet against
this mode of manufactory male prohibite and
making them into crimes: his more particular object on that
occasion was, to save his gangs of criminals from
punishment. The late Major Cartwright of
Give us our rights memory and Sir Charles Wolseley
were of the number. M I employed the late Mr J Benyon
as Attorney General for Chester, and Mr Justice Warren as Judge
for
for do to answer the
pamphlet. They did so
saying that wise men
sometimes did foolish
things. This was at once
civil and effectual. The
Jury were satisfied by it,
and said Guilty!

We cannot punish a man for any thing we please; for one thing as well as another. Suppose for example a fancy took us for punishing Mr
Bentham for his pamphlet: we would punish him as for a libel: — we would punish him as for a conspiracy. In this case we could say to speak [+]1
[+] of him as having conspired with the Printer:
or if we had a mind to scare the Printer, we
might put John Doe into the indictment
in his stead. To be sure John Doe [+]2
[+]2 could b not be found: for though continually
hunted he is never found. But is that a reason
why a conspirator such as Mr Bentham should
go unpunished.



Identifier: | JB/031/071/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31.

Date_1

1828-09-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

6

Box

031

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

071

Info in main headings field

blackstone

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

9757

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in